It is viewed as an extremely controversial topic in which some think of animals as their own while others believe animal testing is needed for medical progress and research. Animal testing should be abolished because the tests performed on animals are unethical,
Animals are being used for personal needs and used against their will so morally this seems wrong. There has been many side effects to testing that have hurt mankind so there are very good reasons to do away with animal testing. Do the pros of animal testing outweigh the cons? I believe they both cancel each other out and no matter what we do there will be a risk for reward. Seeing what animal testing has done for mankind is a major factor in this paper because it has done wonders for us in the medical field, but the cost has been equal and has hurt many.
Animal Cruelty comes in several forms, many of which are often overlooked by people on an everyday basis. Animal cruelty is defined as someone hurting or not properly caring for an animal responsibly. A big contributor to this is animal testing, which is the use of animals in research and developmental experiments. In order to fully understand animal testing, a brief history of when and why it was started in the first place.
When it comes to the topic of cosmetic animal testing (Cosmetic animal testing- taking cosmetic products finished or unfinished and using them on animals in many different ways to test for different affects), most people will acknowledge that it is inhumane and unsafe for the sake of animals. When this agreement ends, it is on the question of why we need animals in research. Whereas some are convinced that it’s not harmful to any animal during the process, others maintain that it’s still the most known cosmetic testing today. The Humane Society acknowledges that testing on animals is a well known form of cosmetic testing.
All animals truly deserve to lead happy and healthy lives, yet some creatures are subjected to harsh animal testing experiments. Evidence has proved that animal tests are unregulated and longer prove accurate results. Animal testing needs be illegal in the United States because it is truly inhumane and completely unnecessary. Animal testing has been used for many centuries now. In fact, testing of animals can be traced all the back to the early Greeks.
Also animal rights are ignored when they are being used for testing (Lonestar.edu). Stephanie Liou’s article “Animal Research: The Ethics Of Animal Experimentation”, states that people believe animals do have moral status (Web.Stanford.edu). The article also states that animals and humans are similar because both can feel pain and pleasure so animals should have the same moral status and treatment (Web.Stanford.edu). As a result, animals should be treated equally just like humans and thereare certain laws involved in animal testing. According to the Animal Legal Defense Fund’s article “Animal Testing and the Law”, “Legal test include burning, poisoning, starving, forced smoking, mutilating, etc” (aldf.org).
The methods of testing are unethical or give suspect at best. People did not name their kid to keep from being attached. They did that because he / she could of died of a whooping cough. Animal testing saves more lives than it harms. People should get animal
Mahatma Gandhi once stated, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” In today’s world, animals are being used to control scientific variables in experiments including drug testing, the creation of cosmetics, and treatments for diseases. Animal testing can be beneficial in the aspect that it has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. However, on the other hand, animal testing can be seen as cruel and inhumane because of the way animals are treated. Animal testing is more complicated in the aspect that it is not just simply putting the end product on the animals, but torturing the defenseless animals with relentless experiments causing an unknown amount of pain.
Should scientists be allowed to test products intended for human use on animals? Do you have a furry little friend that you love? If so then you too can understand why animal testing for human products is cruel and unnecessary. Some do not realize what happens to animals who get tested for the products that you use. Once you understand the facts about animal testing you to will feel bad for these furry little guys and want to stop this abuse.
For example chimpanzees share similar DNA with humans as well as mice which indicate that the products being tested on animals will likely be a success to humans too. Various life-saving treatments have been discovered from testing on animals and have especially served the medical field in a positive way. For example, reassuring the safety of drugs, the development of new medicine and improving health. In addition to all this these experiments it can be very expensive, have led to many animal deaths, and have gone against their rights.
This shows that an animal’s anatomy is too different than a human’s to give correct results. To sum up, animals are not identical to humans which can make them bad testing subjects. In summary, animals should not be used in testing. Animal experimentation is cruel and inhumane, and it can be replaced with other methods.
In the end, the minimal protections offered by the AWA and PHS policy provide no real safety or relief to the millions of animals in labs and offer only a false sense of security to the caring public. All it takes is for people to know the facts about animal testing and what truly goes on behind closed doors. If more people understood how it affects the lives of animals, maybe, just maybe their could be a change in the way people think about animal
Animal experimentation is a very noteworthy subject that has created quite a stir amongst the world. Anything from monkeys becoming anemic due to starvation to puppies with open sores from a new topical cream to relieve itching; animal experimentation is something that has been around since 129 AD. Testing human diseases or medicines on animals is factually not accurate, considering that there are so many differences between a human and a non-human animal. According to PETA, ASPCA, The Humane Society, and the article The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation by Aysha Akhtar, they explain that animal experimentation can be avoided and is an unnecessary step in today’s testing. Most humans typically care for non-human animals and take
In his work, Tom Regan establishes the rights of animals used in scientific research. He argues that when animals are used as objects of experiment, they are not respected and their inherent value is not acknowledged. Having inherent value, as defined by Regan, is a state, in which a being is not just a vessel, but a being with a complex mental life. All who have inherent value are to have it equally.