This information will help me talk about the other side of my argument. It 's good to touch base
This is one of the many reasons again why I am against animal testing. The animals can be treated poorly and thrown into so many stressful and dangerous situations, and they have no say in any of it. Scientist do however explain why animals make good test subjects, they couldn’t do test on some humans to see what happens when you do something to the brain but because some animals are similar they can get close enough results. Yes, animal subjects help science and without it I know we wouldn’t have some of the advances like we do
Human beings desperately need animal testing for the development of cures as well as for the sake of civilisation. If it wasn’t for animal testing, human beings would not be alive today. Animal testing has played a significant role in developing numerous medications that are absolutely necessary for us to live such as antibiotics, penicillin, and
This may be true in some cases, but the human body is different than most other animals, but the animals that do have similar working body systems would be used to near extinction. Since the human body is different, the results from animal testing would be unreliable and dangerous to people if it was the only research used. Why do humans still test on animals when there is still a risk at the
Animal testing, though beneficial for scientific study, discovery, and experimentation, can be detrimental and threatening for the animals tested on, making it a very debatable and controversial topic. Hope R. Ferdowsian, a George Washington University Assistant Clinical Professor in the Department of medicine, and Nancy Beck, a member of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, are authors of the article “Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research.” They discuss the “3 R’s” as being the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animals when doing scientific research. They write, “These principles encouraged researchers to work to reduce the number of animals used in experiments to the minimum considered
Perhaps giving animals the likeness of a machine is to far. However, the concept of animals only being able to learn from experience and not from teaching the way humans do helps serperate the two parties and further push the idea that we are different and should not hold the same rights. Another argument used by the supporters of animal testing is the notion of voluntary consent. Human beings have the mental capacity to personally volunteer themselves for experimentation for the advancement of modern medicine if they so desired. Animals, on the other hand, lack this mental capacity.
There are many people that say they should not be tested on. they say that it is unethical and the reasons are experimenting on animals is always unacceptable because it causes suffering to animals,the benefits to human beings are not proven, any benefits to human beings that animal testing does provide could be produced in other ways. The case for animal experiments is that they will produce such great
The biggest reason of those who are against dissection is animal rights. Behavioral studies of diverse animals shown that some animals, including dogs, magpies, and elephants, while not as advanced as humans, animals do have a sense of self-awareness. If some
Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.
Over 100 million animals are used every year in the United States for cosmetic, and scientific testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatment, determine toxicity in medications, check the safety of products for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare uses. Advocates of animal testing claim that it has implemented the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, also that there is no other alternative method for researching a complete living organism, and that strict regulations prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories. Opponents of animal testing argue that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that there are alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and animals