Animal Testing Utilitarianism Essay

For this experiment, I choose the issue of animal rights. It’s my considered opinion that the ethical attitude to animals is inseparable from the fundamental moral values. David A. Nibert points out in his article Animal Rights and Human Social Issues, that “Immanuel Kant … recognized the relationship between people 's callous treatment of animals and their treatment of each other” (1994, p. 115). Probably, someone would ask me, “What are you talking about? We face today many social problems: drugs, terrorism, poverty, diseases, environmental pollution, child abuse, and so on.

Introduction Life is based on love, care and hope, not necessarily between humans only. We should love and care about all living organisms, from bugs to animals in the wild. People nowadays hope for a healthier life for their families and themselves; in order to achieve such a goal they sacrifice the lives of many animals for the selfish purpose of leading a healthier life. They offer up animal lives for animal testing. However, I’m sure we all lost a beloved one to cancer at one point of our lives, and we wished that there were a way to help them.

It also showed that animal testing does not only help humans but animals too. I am going to include this information in my paper to show the people who are fighting against animal testing are fighting improvements with humans and animals. Cressey, Daniel. "Animal Research: Battle Scars." Nature News.

The Suggestion was made that scientists should explore alternative options, such as testing on cell and tissue cultures. On the other hand, Sabin also puts forward an argument in support of animal testing, as her dear late husband Albert Sabin conducted many tests on animals whilst perfecting his vaccine against polio. The sacrifice of these animals has enabled entire generations of humans to grow up without fear of the crippling effects of polio. Animal rights advocates who see animal experimentation as cruel and wasteful overlook the fact that it has been instrumental in developing medicines that have saved countless human

There are many ethic issues when it comes to testing on animals. In our textbook, (p59) they raise two very important questions when it comes to testing on animals. One, does the research threaten the health and or well-being of the animal, and is it fair to the animal to be the one tested on when you are doing an experiment that should involve humans. With experiments, you typically need to get an informed consent form done before you begin. This allows the test subject to know what they are getting into and if there is any danger.

1.0 Introduction 1.1Background of the issue This report is written to study the effects of animal testing on the cosmetic products among the developing countries as there are issues which happened to cause government and non-governmental organisations as well as the societies around the world to analyse the relationship between the two. Animal testing is an experiment that is carried out on the animals to ensure the safety and effectiveness of certain medications or cosmetics. In 1930, ‘Lash Lure’, a mascara which is a type of cosmetic product that contains a chemical that could burn the skin has caused more than a dozen women to go blind. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act was passed in 1938 prompted by requiring safety testing of

Even though it is cruel to the animals, not always effective, and there are existing alternatives, animal testing is still used around the world every day, but is animal testing necessary? (peta.org) What are animal rights? Animal rights are the protection of animals from cruelty through requirements of humane treatment. Laws protecting animal rights proscribe certain forms of brutal and merciless treatment of animals in medical and scientific research and in the handling of and slaughter of animals for human consumption (encyclopedia.com). Today there are thousands of activist groups around the world that focus on animal testing, animal cruelty, and the misuse of animals.

Old Major appealed to the emotions of the animals by listing their physical and emotional sufferings. The credibility of Old Major and the fear of one’s life united the animals to rebel against Mr. Jones. Old Major’s speech was more effective than Martin Luther King Jr.’s speech because of how his persuasive techniques struck fear into the hearts of the animals which served as a reason for the animals to unite. The sympathy that Old Major makes the animals feel for themselves and each other helped his speech to be more effective than MLK’s. The detailed way that Old Major described what happens to specific animals is what caused his speech to be so effective.

For instance, during Snowball’s expulsion, Squealer states, “No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be” (55). By making contradictory statements, Squealer is very confusing to understand to these ignorant animals, yet Squealer is very believable, he is basically just brainwashing them to believe whatever he wants by tricking them, proving the power of words. Squealer uses the power of words by having a quick-thinking mind and using tricky and effective word choice to achieve his goal of deceiving the animals to create a large number of followers for

All things entirely easy for people to comprehend. McPhee 's personification of the bear creates a foundational for readers to relate to the bear and feel the same pull to protect themselves and their brethren and enact revenge upon any that pose as or act on a threat. It is refreshingly simplistic in comparison to the complex, conniving ways of human society, and that simplicity of nature in and of itself is a beautiful thing. It appeals to the primitive side of humans, persuading them to act on their basic urges like the grizzly bear does in the