During the 20th Century the United States was going through big changes. Imperialism was a big thing going on during this time. The US was imperialistic because it was constantly annexing new states and discovering new territories. After the Spanish-American war, the US acquired a few new territories, one of which being the Philippines. The annexation of the Philippines was a big debate in the USA during 1898. Some Americans believed that the US should acquire the Philippines in order to save them from other countries, to help govern them, and of course, in order to expand and grow our country. Whereas others believed that America should leave the Philippines alone because they should be allowed to have independence, the same way America gained …show more content…
This argument can be seen in the document titled, “The March of the Flag.” This document was written by Albert J. Beveridge. In the document he argues that only those who are capable of self government, should be able to determine who they want to be governed by. The text states, “The opposition tells us that we ought not to govern a people without their consent. I answer, The rule … that all just government derives its authority from the consent of the governed, applies only to those who are capable of self-government.” (The March of the Flag). In addition, a document that was a speech given by President William McKinley also states that the Filipinos were unfit for self government. McKinley states, “...that we could not leave them to themselves – they were unfit for self-government – and they would soon have anarchy and misrule over there worse than Spain’s was…” (Document C). Both documents show that the US believed the Filipinos were somehow incapable of governing themselves, so they felt that us Americans should step in and do it for …show more content…
Many others believed that the US should not annex the Philippines. One of the main arguments was that it was immoral and hypocritical to do so. This is seen in the document titled, “Platform of the American Anti-Imperialist League.” The document shows reasons why it would be ignorant to annex the Philippines. The text states, “We hold with Abraham Lincoln, that ‘no man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent. When the white man governs himself, that is self-government, but when he governs himself and also governs another man, that is more than self-government – that is despotism [rule by a tyrant].’” (Document A). The American Anti-Imperialist League shows why it would be wrong to annex the Philippines. Furthermore, the document titled “Paralyzing Influence of Imperialism,” adds to the Anti-Imperialist League’s thoughts and ideas. The document, written by William Jennings Bryan, states “Some argue that American rule in the Philippine Islands will result in the better education of the Filipinos. Be not deceived…. [We] dare not educate them lest they learn to read the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States and mock us for our inconsistency.” He rebukes the argument (that the US should annex the Philippines in order to better educate them) by pointing out how we will look foolish once the Filipinos learn how to read our Declaration of Independence when we did not allow
This finally triggered McKinley to go to war, and it was justified because the Cuban and Filipino people needed protection against the strong Spanish empire. Ultimately, the Spanish were wiped out by the U.S. and the Philippines demanded independence. However, McKinley needed to please the imperialism-loving voters that elected him to office. Therefore, the United States retained the Philippines so the country would not fall into the hands of economic rivals like France or
The expansion of America was desirable, creating a false duty to get rid of barbaric influence from asianic countries to expand America’s empire. After the end of Spanish rule in the Philippines, Senator Albert Beveridge saw potential in recruiting the Philippines as US territory. He writes, “...The Philippines gives us a base at the door of all East”(Beveridge 1). He wanted to expand America's commercial trades with Asia, but in order to do so would need an ally near the east. Knowing that the Philippines had just come out of Spanish rule, Beveridge suggested in the letter that they were not capable of self-governing, and America's intervention would be needed.
According to Teddy, imperialist concepts consisted of securing as many ports and colonies as was possible, to reinforce America as a world power in both military and trade areas. At the close of the short-lived Spanish-American War, the U.S. Government had a new problem on its hands. The powers, that be, could not agree on how to resolve serious issues involving newly acquired colonies. Supporters of imperialism wanted to keep the Philippines, under U.S. control,
Many Americans thought occupying foreign countries, like the Philippines after the Spanish American War, was a bad idea because it contradicts the American values of equality found in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. (Doc D) However, a majority of America sided with people like Senator Albert J. Beveridge who believed people were chosen by God to expand into China and the Philippines to open more Asian markets. (Doc E) This was a continuation of past expansionism because acquiring land for money Manifest Destiny have been motives for expansionism for
In the "Now, Will He Let Go?" political cartoon, Uncle Sam is shown holding onto the planet Earth, representing it belongs to the United States that is written out onto the Earth. (Document G) America's annexation has shown its excessive control over these foreign territories and their independence. The United States did not believe it was time to let go of these territories and let them become independent. The belief of not having enough territory showed through the United States' actions, and the Philippines was left with no independence right after the
The Philippines, led by Emilio Aguinaldo wanted to be an independent country instead of being colonized by yet another nation. In an attempt to achieve this, they fought America for their liberation, which led to the death of 20,000 Filipino soldiers and 200,000 Filipino civilians who perished from disease, violence, and famine due to the war. Following the Treaty of Paris at the end of the Spanish American War, Twain states, “I have read carefully the Treaty of Paris, and I have seen that we do not intend to free, but to subjugate the people of the Philippines. We have gone there to conquer, not to redeem. It should, it seems to me, be our pleasure and duty to make those people free, and let them deal with their own domestic questions in their own way.
It formalized the transfer of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines from Spain to the United States after the Spanish-American War. The acquisition of these overseas territories provided the U.S. with new spheres of influence and extended its reach beyond its borders, solidifying its role as a major player on the global stage. However, this expansion also raised questions about the ethical implications of acquiring foreign lands and governing distant
The following publication of Albert J. Beveridge’s powerful speech, strongly advocates the annexation of the Philippines, which took a virtually major relationship between religion, race, and profit for imperial expansion. The most striking point about Albert J. Beveridge text, however is his five poorly thought out reasons justifiying Americas to colonize the Phillippines, which were religion, trade, keeping up with other countries, resources, and “barbarous” natives. Albert J. Beveridge, a first-term Republican senator from Indiana, was one of the most ardent advocates of imperialism. Noted for his speaking abilities and fervent nationalism, Beveridge traveled to the Philippines in order to gather information. In Albert J. Beveridge’s 1900
They saw it as the “perfect stepping-stones” trade with China and the rest of Asia. American business men felt it was necessary for the government to show some authority and capitalize on this opportunity. American saw Manila as their
In 1899, the United States annexed the Philippines after a short but bloody war with Spain. These rich, plentiful islands full of resources were in great demand. The U.S. saw the Philippines; fighting against Spain so like them when they were rebelling, and decided to step in and aid ‘the spirit of 1776’ (Doc. A). However, the question still remains: should the United States have annexed the Philippines?
The US should not have annexed the Philippines because it would be hypocritical of Americans, the
O’Sullivan was an American columnist whom was known for his use of the term, “manifest destiny,” which promoted the annexation of Texas to the United States. He argues that the adverse attitude toward Texas’ independence from Mexico needs to end. In this article, O’Sullivan also expands on the importance of the growth of the country throughout the continent. It further acknowledges the freedom of Texas as not a rebellion, but by abandonment from Mexico. John O’Sullivan sees the future of America expanding into California and Mexico becoming a country without a real government.
A common belief at the time was that Filipinos were an inferior race and McKinley’s statements prove that be would probably agree with this belief. McKinley’s decision to annex the Philippines may not have been wrong but his justifications
Abraham Lincoln, the sixteenth president of the United States, had said “No man is good enough to govern another man without the other’s consent.” Now picture one’s own home, city, and country being liberated from their past tyrannical rulers by the United States, which goes on to rule them with the same dictatorial hand. That is exactly what happened to the Philippines as the result of the Spanish-American War. The United States’ annexation of the Philippines was a very controversial act that took place in 1898, and it took a great amount of debate over whether it was a good or bad idea to annex it in the first place. This conquest was the result of the United States’ war with Spain, of which the Americans won with assistance from the Philippines.
When we made allies of the Filipinos and armed them to fight against Spain”. In my opinion, I think that the people of America had just gone based off of what President Lincoln had stated so greatly before. Yes, he may have expired from this Earth, but based of of what he had been saying corresponds very well to the situation at hand. To me, I think that Abraham Lincoln was one of the greatest Presidents of all time. The wonderful saying that Abraham Lincoln said (Based off of the article in Document A): “no man is good enough to govern another man without that other’s consent.