Running head: SAME SEX MARRIAGE 1
Change Perception towards Same Sex Marriage:
Name:
Institution:
Annotated Bibliography
Logan, B. (2000). Same-sex ‘marriage’? Tauranga, N.Z: AFFIRM Publications.
The author is an elite researcher and pro-gay sex marriage activist. The content of the book is credible enough as it relates to the subject matter by describing current statistics and trends. The author provokes the mind of readers to assume change of mindset and perception towards gays and lesbians or a better future. The author discusses the need for society to have a different mind as regards homosexuality. The author argues
…show more content…
The author is quick to debate and provoke readers to change their minds on the concepts that seek to make homosexuality seem like a trait acquired from birth. Staver argues that homosexuality is a condition inflicted upon an individual due to their environment and turned into a habit through constant use. The author likens homosexuality to lying by pointing out that no human being is born a liar, people just learn how to lie based on their environment. The author suggests that habits can be learned, and they can also be unlearned. This is a detailed summary of information about homosexuals as well as gay rights. It has unequivocal arguments against the same-sex marriage. It points out the obscenity and perversion of nature that same-sex marriage creates. This author submits to the ideology that same-sex marriage should, in fact, be made illegal in all nations around the …show more content…
Their contribution is accredited and easily verifiable based on a keen following of their research work. They write in support of the habit and thus defend those who practice it. The authors discuss the subject matter of homosexuality by giving very valid points. Most people do not have personal differences with the homosexuals as they are ready to coexist with them. This group of tolerant citizens only malign themselves from the gays because of their religious and church affiliation. The legalization of homosexuality won’t tamper with the church’s beliefs contrary to what many people think. Legalization of gay marriages won’t necessarily mandate or impose upon the churches a legal obligation to officiate the union of parties engaged in such. Churches will still retain the right to choose which marriages to officiate and which not to. This is essential because the freedom of religion has to be upheld too. Therefore, since the government and religious beliefs are distinctively different, homosexuality apart from the church ought to be
This analyses that same sex couples should also have the right to marry. One of the reason why the supreme court sided with Loving was because “Decisions about marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can
Corvino’s essay “Homosexuality and the PIB Argument” elaborates on the disagreements between certain parties, such as natural law lawyers and other philosophers, pertaining to homosexuality and the notion that allowing same sex marriage will permit others to practice polygamy, incest, and bestiality (PIB). Corvino insists that when looking upon this argument, one will need to recognize and comprehend all sides of the dispute and thus be able to scrutinize such arguments proficiently. Through the process of analyzing all sides of this notorious disagreement, Corvino hopes to clarify and refute homosexuality and the PIB argument as well as give his own analysis and position on the subject (3). Corvino begins his debate by explaining the PIB
I know that many married couples tend to have very different personalities. On paper these differences may make the marriage seem unsuccessful; however, practically these differences help each person grow individually by pushing each other out of their comfort zones, which in turn causes the marriage relationship to grow. It is this complimenting nature of marriage and the Trinity that shows us how a homosexual marriage cannot reflect God’s design for a godly
When debating the legalization of same sex marriage, religious reasoning and accusations of bigotry often provoke obstinance. Instead of reiterating those arguments, William J. Bennett, a prominent cultural conservative, former secretary of education, and author of The Book of Virtues, focuses on societal effects in his op-ed article, “Against Gay Marriage.” Though Bennett’s piece conveys partiality, it also attempts to discuss this issue scrupulously to ensure readers will consider his argument and perhaps accept his implications. While some of Bennett’s word choices convey tolerance of the gay community, his rhetoric incites readers to accept that preserving society requires marginalizing homosexuals.
The future of same-sex marriage has long been a question in the United States; on June 26, 2015, under the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Obergefell v. Hodges, the country finally got an answer. In a five to four decision, the Supreme court determined that under the Fourteenth Amendment, marriage between same- sex couples is legal in all fifty states. Under this decision, states that had previously banned same-sex marriage will have to recognize and permit same-sex marriage within their boundaries. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges is a landmark decision that will not affect same-sex couples throughout the nation, but also every aspect of our society. Having been hired by a sociologist who wants to study the effect of
Max Rosner Professor Pellegrini 3 April 2023 Midterm Paper #1 “Proposition 8 – made simple” is an informational political advertisement in support of Proposition 8, a 2008 California ballot measure which attempted to overturn the legalization of same-sex marriage. “Proposition 8 – made simple” utilizes the example of two couples, Jan and Tom, and Dan and Michael, to center its argument. Although the two couples are friends, Jan and Tom still believe in traditional family values which they worry will be compromised in the wake of same-sex marriage legalization. We can see three concepts at play in this example: tolerance, the public, and religious moralism.
Stephanie Camberos Mrs. Ybarra Phil 1C 21 October 2016 Unnatural by society or Nature? Being in favor of homosexuality, John Corvino brings up several arguments and counter arguments as to why homosexual sex is deemed as unnatural in our society. Is it unnatural because majority of society chooses to portray it in such a way or is it unnatural for nature related reasons? John Corvino in this reading discussed both sides when viewing homosexual sex as “unnatural”.
It showed the relationship of these sexual identity changes with traditional society and modern culture. In today’s world, where technology grows with a fast pace, humans are ready to do everything what will satisfy their mental needs and physical ideals. This book talked about the role of religion in today’s world, conflicts in society, emotions and social movements and sociology and grace. This book is very useful in context of understanding and accepting changes in sexual identity, what is very often in Western Europe and North America. Also, Cooper explained how these changes are rarely accepted in Eastern Europe and Asia.
Considering the political issues today same-sex marriage controversy serves to be significant as it has not been able to reach its height at the national level. As only 36 states out of 50 legally approve of same-sex marriage (Fausset and Blinder, The NewYork Times.com). Amending the Constitution for same-sex marriage serves to be a huge controversy and a difficult process due to many opinions present within the political and social circuit. Another reason many citizens do not support the idea of same-sex marriage is due to traditional social beliefs and morals. For example, many Americans oppose the idea of same-sex marriage on religious grounds.
The culture of same sex sexuality has spread all over the world with specific traits and behaviors. The dressing code is unique and at the same time they have unique traits they identify with. Further the gays and Lesbian movements have become common in an effort to fight for their rights (Fingerhut 2239). They have become so vocal that some countries worldwide such as the US and UK have granted them their freedom (Mishna et al 1607). These movements have been recognized and registered.
I do not believe that same sex marriage would “under-mine” public morality. I believe that people in toda'ys society that are truly shaken up by same-sex marriage, is those of the older generation. In the book Doing Ethics “To violate people’s right to equal treatment and equal opportunity is to treat them merely as a means to regard them as less than persons with full moral rights.”(453) Most people 45 and younger can completely accept same-sex marriage. Rick Guy, a former councilman and Republican candidate states that “it is sad that people were unable to see the unique dignity of marriage between a man and a women is very discouraging.”
Moral panic occurs when a certain group of people pose a threat to the norms of a specific society and because their behaviour challenges societal norms and expectations they are perceived to be deviant. When a moral panic occurs, there are two groups involved, the moral entrepreneur who practices and promotes the obedience of societal norms and the folk devil who rejects this and does not conform to these norms. In this essay, I will be using sexual orientation as an example of a moral panic, I will analyse the role conservative individuals in a society undertake as the moral entrepreneur and how the non-conforming queer individuals are viewed as the folk devil. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .
In What about Gender Roles in Same-Sex Relationships?, Stephen Mays critiques various gender stereotypes, including ones affecting gay people and straight people, both men and women. In Mays opinion, gender roles do not determine sex (male or female), therefore I agree with the author’s point of view that what a partner in a same-sex relationship may decide to do in a relationship is not pre-determined by their biological sex. Mays stated, “[d]espite sexual orientation, some people simply demonstrate more masculine qualities or more feminine qualities” (719). In gender roles, a male or female in the past was based on societies’ definitions that they are supposed to practice something that defines or pertains to their role in the relationship.
Yip’s article discusses how religious texts such as the bible and the Quran, become a basis for marginalizing the non-heterosexuals. As mentioned in the article, it is true that homosexuals are always looked at negatively in these religious scriptures, but does it give the right for religious authorities to suppress these people? This essay will discuss some of the main points of the article and will tackle the different critiques about homosexuals in the Quran and in the bible. In the beginning of the article, Yip talks about how in western society, homosexuality is still a big issue up to this date.
Joey Cho Mrs. Middleton English 10 17 October 2016 Persuasive Research Essay Outline Introduction LGBT/ same-sex marriage is one of the most heated and controversial debates in our current society. Unlike the past thousands of years whereas marriage was defined as a legal union between a man and a woman, now the concept of marriage has been extended to a broader context. “Homosexuality” in most cultures is viewed as a disgrace, and it is often considered as a great sin from a religious aspect.