Annotated Bibliography Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. The British Broadcasting Corporation, London and Penguin Books, 1972. Print. The book is about ways of seeing things that present around. Berger suggests that it is wrong common assumption that our ways of perception are spontaneous. Our ways of perception are manipulated by publicity and shaped by the rise capitalism and consumerism. Berger questions some the traditions of European art history. Actually, the book is not about the specific paintings, but about the ways that people see and understand the art now. This book is a useful source. I believe that information presented is reliable. The source is objective. It gives information for consideration. It teaches to see things from different …show more content…
Gauntlett, David. Moving Experiences: Understanding Television’s Influences and Effects (2nd ed.). Indiana University Press, 2005. Print David Gauntlett gathered all evidence of the television harmful influence. However, he also presented the evidence that the blame is not only on producers and writers. The viewers are also responsible for their actions. He states that influence of TV shows is complex and indirect. He is confident that many of the ill effects that exist today are not related to the television. The source was helpful. The source gave me understanding of scope of negative influence that relates to TV shows. It was one of the most helpful sources with a lot of scientific data. A lot of interview with psychologists and other scholars were presented in the book. I think the information was reliable. The author was mostly objective. The source confirmed my argument; it includes variety of different opinion on the television cultural influence. Gray, Jonathan. Television Entertainment. Communication and Society. Routledge, 2008. …show more content…
The information is reliable. As Mitell wrote himself, his work is to give information. The readers work and see the message. The source was objective. The author presented all kinds of views on problem of the television impact on cultural development of the society. Philo, Greg. Seeing and Believing: The Influence of Television. Routledge, 1990. Print. This book is all about influence. There is a lot of scientific and psychological data on influence and suggestion. The author is confident that the TV programming is an influential tool of propaganda. In his opinion, the government for a long time shape the population along to their preferences. The book offers insights on what effect the television has on child’s mental state and development. The source is useful. It is the most negative source in relation to the television influence on the society. I think that source is mostly biased. In source presented an extensive data, but all most all the data confirm negative influence of the television. The goal of the source is to teach views to be more selective and not believe everything they see. It confirmed that ways of seeing the problem of the television impact is different. Actually, the book convinced me to be more cautious while watching TV
In the short story “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. and the essay “The Great Imagination Heist” by Reynold Price, both portray the effects of television as a negative impact on our lives, however they use different evidence to support it. The main idea of TV regarding Harrison Bergeron is that TV is desensitizing and makes us unintelligent. Evidence to support this was desensitizing is that Harrison Bergeron’s world was gray and bland. No one had emotion or feeling. Even at the end where George’s child died no one ever felt much emotion.
The American obsession with spectatorship is a phenomenon created by the inaccessibility of timely and relevant knowledge. This oddly leads to an increase in the demand and likeability of terror. In her piece “Great to Watch”, Maggie Nelson explores the origins of this fascination with horror and gives an
A study from Lull in 2000 supported Alladin’s assertion that mass media socializes consumers, Gerbner and Gross’ Cultivation Theory explained how television impacts viewer’s behaviors, and a study from Sharifirad supported Alladin’s concern over media outlets targeting adolescents at a vulnerable age. Along with multiple other sources, Alladin included these studies to build a strong case against the power media outlets exercise on adolescents. These sources gave credibility to Alladin’s concern over increasing obesity rates, and therefore suggested obesity rates increase alongside television
TV without Guilt by David Finkel focuses on the Delmar family’s relationship with TV. What I enjoyed about this article is how the family kept an open-mindedness about television. For example, “I mean without TV, who would exist? Just these middle-class people I see every day. I wouldn’t know anything else that goes on” (83).
Like the media, Hollywood has a significant impact on viewers to perceive life and to
David Charpentier’s essay Story or Spectacle? Why Television Is Better Than the Movies discusses Charpentier’s preference for watching television over film. Charpentier strongly supports his opinion throughout the essay with multiple reasons why by comparing popular television shows and movies. Television shows have better character development, are able to have multiple sub plots and leave room for space and time between each episode. Charpentier argues that television shows allow you to better get to know the characters, rather than if you were watching a two hour film.
Cultivation theory is a theory founded by George Gerbner that explains whether or not the audience of a television program will be affected by watching it. Ways that the audience could be affected by television viewing are by becoming more violent, more sad, or happier after viewing. Television is the use of the study for cultivation because people tend to watch more television than listen to radio or read media sources. Also, television is used for the study because it is the most accessible and many people get the same perspective from a program that they are viewing rather than listening to radio or reading a news article. Most analysis’ deal with the immediate reaction of viewers after they complete watching a television program; cultivation theory is based on a long term basis that sets it apart from other theories according to Signorielli.
Since the television shows make influences on people, their values conveyed in the programs also impact social morality. If the directors of television shows only focus on the entertaining functions of television programs to make profits, the public’s morality will have danger to be lowered
Neil Postman in Chapter 1 of "Amusing Ourselves to Death" aims to show how the television can manipulate a person 's decision in politics, religion, education and turn those into entertainment. Even today Postman’s ideeas stand strong and it is true that if an information is entertaining the viewer will not look at the autenticity or what the origins of it are. Probably as expected, the more the technology advances, the more the manipulation from the television is taking place. This is done by: changing how people think, making their brain numb by not allowing them to have an opinion and interfering in their family life and in people decision-making process. The only way to save ouselves from living under the control of the television is simply
For example; statistics and therefore the media show that the amount people living alone in big cities have never been this high before, which might encourage potential hikikomoris towards reclusion. Researchers also call television the “cultural river” and saying that everyone is somehow carried by it (Shanahan and Morgan 1999, p.12). The author states that everyone is basically kind of influenced by the television, either by commercials, TV shows,.... Some people more, some less, but the important thing here in this quote is the word cultural.
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction The number of hours spent watching television in the United States is relatively high with the average viewer watching up to 150 hours of television per month (Gandossy, 2009). According to cultivation theory, people who watch a great deal of television may have their perceptions of reality skewed by the content they are watching.
Media affect teenagers the most because they spend a lot of time exploring things on it and this could harm them in a negative way. For example: when teenagers watch romantic movies, they could act differently to their love life because they got influenced by the things that they watched. Teenagers could change their behavior due to the things they watch on TV shows, movies, and videos. The young people of today appear to be excessively fascinated in viewing their most loved shows on TV or utilizing web-based social networking
and what’s wrong can be influenced by the type of television show we watch. An example of how powerful the media can be on peoples lives is German propaganda. Through creative film makers and enthusiastic radio personalities they were able to persuade the German men to enlist in
Perspective is a chosen approach that can be used to study any subject in the field of sociology. These perspectives highlight the diverse methods an individual selects to analyze a theme and how they perceive the society in general. Three sociological perspectives include functionalist, conflict and interactionist perspectives (Thompson, Hickey, & Thompson, 2016, p. 2). Throughout this paper, I examine how we analyze the role of television from the functional, conflict, and interactionist approaches. Functionalist perspective on a macro-sociological level places far more emphasis on “the collective life or communal existence than on the individual” (Thompson, Hickey, & Thompson, 2016).
The theory explains “how individuals use mass communication to gratify their needs” (Burgeon, Hunsaker and Dawson, 1994, cited in Udende and Azeez, 2010, p. 34). The theory holds that “people influence the effects that mass media have on them” (Anaeto et al, 2008 cited in Edegoh, Asemah and Nwammuo, 2013, p. 23). The assumption of the theory is that people are not just passive receivers of media messages; rather, they actively influence the message effects. Media audience selectively choose, attend to, perceive and retain media offerings on the basis of their needs, beliefs, etc., thus, “there are as many reasons for using the media as there are media users”