ipl-logo

Anti Federalism In Civil War

834 Words4 Pages

The first paper i chose is anti-federalist paper number seven, which implied that the adoption of the constitution would lead to civil war. In this paper they described how they should stay consistent with what they have. They had just gotten out of the revolutionary war, so at that tie the country was already weak. They claimed that a change in government at a time like that would be fatal for the country. People in the country wanted different things, so a war would likely come about. The article went into detail about how horrible a civil war could be for their country. “Of all the plagues that infest a nation, a civil war is the worst.” This basically warned the people of what would happen if the country did go into a civil war. …show more content…

“Territorial disputes have at all times been found one of the most fertile sources of hostility among nations.” This was already a common problem in the US because states wanted to claim the western unsettled land. The paper claimed that a federal government like the one they had created with the constitution could be like an umpire. This would stop the arguing and actually prevent a civil war. I believe that parts of each were correct. I can understand why the anti-federalists were so worried about a civil war. Their country was weak at the time and they just wanted to …show more content…

They didn’t expect people to just “accept the merit of the constitution on faith alone.” The federalists knew they had to prove themselves, so they claimed that the constitution was written by ordinary people like the ones criticizing it. They said that there is no plan that is faultless. The articles of confederation were very unstable, so they wanted to make the constitution to where the government was more stable, but it wouldn’t threaten the people’s liberties. They came to a conclusion that to avoid too much power, they would let people be

Show More
Related

  • Essay On Anti Federalists

    642 Words  | 3 Pages

    Henry was one of the firsts to come out and publicly oppose the Constitution. He argued that the strong national government proposed by the Federalists was a threat to the rights of individuals and that the President would become a king. That taxes would be enforced again, and nothing would change from the separation of the British other then than a new face under a crown. In Rhode Island resistance against the Constitution was so strong that civil war almost broke out on July 4, 1788 on because of the issue of federalism to vs. Anti-Federalism (otherwise known as the battle between the yankees to and the loyalists). At the bitter convention of in Massachusetts, letters essays, debates, and conflict arose to product the devise a solution of 5 and assure that five more states ratifying would ratify the Constitution, and work on solutions They also worked to amend the Bill of Rights.

    Read More

  • Discussion Of General Laws Of Government Convention 1 Of 1787

    860 Words  | 4 Pages

    At this point, those that favored a strong in the middle of government, the federalists, were getting the discussion but the federalists still had to come out on top in the approval of the persons in general. They did this with the Federalist papers. These papers had within able to get other to do Arguments 2, written by Madison, Jay, and Hamilton, on why people should give support to make clear again the Constitution by giving an account of how our government will be balanced under the newly offered government system (medical man 8). The Federalist papers helped those who favored a stronger of the nation government get the most near reaction test of the constitution 3. There were many unhappy people with the constitution 3, as they saw that this newly statement of the nation government could freely rule over the people without a Bill of rights (medical man 2).

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

    1511 Words  | 7 Pages

    Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

    Read More

  • Constitution Of 1787 Dbq Essay

    1020 Words  | 5 Pages

    To them, it was clear that the Articles of Confederation were not upholding America, and therefore, America could not succeed. While they did to some extent listen to the fears of the Antifederalists—as is evidenced by the passing of the Bill of Rights—they altogether tended to be more optimistic when it came to the Constitution. One of the founding principles of the Federalist Party was their support of a strong central government. A strong central government would provide needed stability, more so than the Articles of Confederation ever could. The Federalists were also generally less concerned with ensuring individual’s rights, as many of them felt it was the government’s duty to serve the people, and such rights did not need to be formally written because they should already be in place.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

    Read More

  • Why Did The Federalists Agree To Interpret The Constitution

    287 Words  | 2 Pages

    They believed that the constitution was a living document and could be changed as the people in society changed. The Federalists believed that if needed the document should have been changeable if it was for the better of the country and the people. An example of this was when the government changed what was considered cruel and unusual punishment for the sake of the people. The

    Read More

  • The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

    99 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

    Read More

  • The Dred Scott Decision And Bleeding Kansas

    756 Words  | 4 Pages

    America’s founders created the constitution in order to create unification and order in the United States. However, there have been controversy surrounding the interpretation of the constitution, this has caused debate over many issues within the country. These issues and the lack of wartime policy within the constitution directly lead to the Civil War, which was one of the worst alterations this nation has faced. The Missouri compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and Bleeding Kansas were controversial issues surrounding the constitution that directly lead to the Civil War.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    490 Words  | 2 Pages

    The objects of jurisdiction… are so numerous, and the shades of distinction between civil causes are oftentimes so slight, that it is more than probable that the state judicatories would be wholly superseded; for in contests about jurisdiction, the federal court, as the most powerful, would ever prevail. " My opinion on anti-federalist is that they want to have strong, separate state governments, rather than a strong centralized government. They added the Bill Of Rights to protect people's right and to protect citizens against government. They wanted improvement they wanted the right things for citizens and that’s why they took their time to ratify the

    Read More

  • Federalists In The 1790s

    904 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Federalists papers were essays written in the 1780s by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison to newspapers. They were written to defend the newly created constitution, in which at least nine of the thirteen colonies had vote yes for it to pass. It started with Alexander’s passion for wanting to fix the economic system. He saw that there were issues in the system that could be solved through enabling the federal government to work together and strictly, to solve them. He knew there were problems because the lack of treasury or a set bank.

    Read More

  • Factions And Federalist Essay No. 10

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    Factions and Federalist Essay No. 10 The federalist papers were a series of 85 essays written to convince the citizens of New York to ratify the constitution. Federalist essay No.10, written by James Madison, discusses political factions and their effects. Madison’s definition of a faction is clearly stated in the essay.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

    Read More

  • Differences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists

    622 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since they were all for the new constitution, they wanted to go ahead and make it. But the Anti-federalists didn’t want this. They were hesitant on this new government. So, that is why the Federalist papers were created. These were a series of 85 essays that tried to convince Anti-Federalists to ratify the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Robert Yates Anti Federalist 17 Summary

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government an excessive amount of power, and while not a Bill of Rights the folks would be in danger of oppression. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution did not want a Bill of Rights, that it might produce a "parchment barrier" that restricted the rights of the folks, as critical protective

    Read More

  • Southern Nationalism In The Civil War

    1668 Words  | 7 Pages

    Democratic editorials took a strongly pro-Unionist position, applying the words traitor and rebellion to the Confederates and their attack on the flag.” The South also exhibited nationalism in newspaper articles as well. The first major battle of the Civil War took place on July 21, 1861, which resulted in a defeat for the Union army. William Russell, a reporter for the London Times, documented the atmosphere in Charleston, South Carolina after the Confederate victory. He observed, “Crowds of armed men singing and promenading the streets.”

    Read More

More about Anti Federalism In Civil War

Open Document