What Rationale Does The Author Give For Conducting The Study
1. What rationale do the author(s) give for conducting the study?
The author that is conducting this research is testing the obedience of a subject when dealing with “stocking a victim” by use of a shock generator. There are thirty levels of shock that are generated varying from a slight shock to a severe shock. Obedience is tested by how long the subject will continue to “shock the victim”. The point of this study is to determine if Americans are obedient even if they know the act is wrong.
2. What is/are the research questions and/or hypothesis/hypotheses?
How obedient would subjects be to researchers when it comes to shocking a victim? Are Americans as obedient to authority as the Germans were during World War II? Does the location of the experimenter and the victim matter?
…show more content…
List the dependent variable(s)?
The dependent variables are amount of shock given, response time, and length of the shock. These three dependent variables come together to form the level of obedience.
5. What are the major findings and do they support the hypothesis/hypotheses or address the research question(s)?
The researcher found that twenty-four out of the forty subjects completed finished the experiment. This is completely against what was expected. The location of the victim and experimenter did make a difference in each circumstance. Americans are not naturally less likely to obey something that they no is wrong. The amount of obedience was highly underestimated. The subjects endured both emotional strain and tension, which was unexpected.
6. What do the results of this study mean in practical terms? (What does the study add to our understanding of the phenomenon?)
People are much more likely to obey someone of authority than expected, even if it is against their beliefs or morals. Something such as Hitler’s rise to power could have been just as possible in the United States because Americans are just as likely as the Germans to continue to do something that they know is
Comparing Milgram And Stanford's Psychological Experiments
130 Words | 1 PagesWhy do we conform, and how far does it go? Solomon Asch asked this question and devised an experiment to see if subjects would conform even if they were uncertain that the group norm was incorrect, this eventually led to Milgram’s and Stanford’s own psychological questions about not only conformity, but also obedience and the roles in which people adapt. This paper will take a deeper look into these experiments, and apply their findings to current and past national events such as the American Armed Forced at detention facilities and the systematic torture of prisoners, along with how these experiments relate to advertising and how it is designed to stimulate a since of conformity among a generation. Finally how does society react towards
Authority In The Short Story Antaeus, By Borden Bear
1076 Words | 5 PagesRenowned psychologist and social experimenter Stanley Milgram once said that “obedience is the psychological mechanism that links individual action to political purpose. It is the dispositional cement that binds men to systems of authority.” In other words, man succumbs to authority because it is rooted in his obedience to jurisdiction. An example of this is the American judicial system, which man is obedient to because that is what’s known. His political or societal purpose however is a learned behavior, or one that he matriculates from the dynamic of his culture.
Freshman 15 Discussion Questions
510 Words | 3 PagesThe article provided no detail on how the studies were done, it only included the conclusions. C) The article does not say how many subjects were in the studies that universities conducted. It is unsure whether the studies from the universities can be valid. I would assume the populations that were used in the studies were college students.
Stanley Milgram's The Experiment Of Autonomy
745 Words | 3 Pages(582). From this experiment, Milgram found that 60-85% of the people were completely obedient and followed along with the experiment, despite the fact that to their knowledge they were actually hurting other people. From this, he concluded that not everyone has the resources needed to resist authority. Even though these were ordinary people, they still went against
The Chameleon Effect Analysis
1623 Words | 7 PagesHuman being are incredibly obedient and natural conformists Stanley Milgram’s Obedience Experiment Would a “good person murder another person on the orders of an authority figure?” YES 65% of the people in this experiment murdered an innocent person All the people who went into the experiment were normal, average, American people who thought they were “good” people Experiment Independent Variable Authority Figure (E) Dependent Variable Obedience of Teacher (T) Obedience: The Iraq War Why did the American people go to war against the people of Iraq?
Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment
810 Words | 4 PagesSince the beginning of the human existence, man has always dominated and ruled over one another be it empires, corporations, or small groups. Authority and obedience has always been a factor of who we are. This natural occurrence can be seen clearly through the psychological experiments known as The Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. Both of these studies are based on how human beings react to authority figures and what their obedience is when faced with conflict.
Review Of Stanley Milgram's Obedience Experiments
2634 Words | 11 PagesAlthough the students in the 1971 experiment were instructed to pretend to be guards while the other half of students were told to act as prisoners, the “guards” took their roles to an unintended level of abuse and according to Zimbardo, it was because of how anonymous the costumes made the guards and the expectation of aggression among the participants. It did not help that the participants were also told that this experiment was to further the knowledge of human behavior and that they should take their roles somewhat seriously. The Stanford experiment unfortunately came to life during the Iraq War of 2003 in the Abu Ghraib prisons and post-9/11 in Guantanamo Bay where innocent Muslim detainees were severely tortured for years in efforts to find the culprits of the devastating attacks. Since some of these soldiers had that advantage of anonymity and belief that they were contributing to the greater good, they felt excused in what they were doing for their government. All three of these scenarios were cases where the abusers claimed to be following orders from their
Psychological Effects Of Bullying
2314 Words | 10 PagesBullying- Social Psychology Social psychology effects us everyday and makes us behave in ways we might not agree with. When we are put in a group we change the way we act towards others without a real explanation, our desire to fit in is greater then we might perceive it to be. Bullying. Something which occurs at all the time everywhere.
Stanley Milgram's Obedience Chapter Summary
503 Words | 3 PagesThe concept of the article by Burger spoke about Milgram’s obedience study and investigates why people are still capable of obeying to authority even today. In today’s time Stanley Milgram’s obedience studies are one of the most highly recognized psychological researches known. The obedience test consisted of participants and a confederate. In the test an administrator told participants that if the other participant in the next room got a question wrong they had to administer a shock and as the test continued the shock valued increase also. At a certain point some of the participants felt uneasy to continue but were told they had to in order to complete the test.
Milgram Experiment
648 Words | 3 PagesIn the Milgram study we watches as humans through the ages of 20-50 were sat down and given a shock test when answering questions, in the replicated study there as “teachers” that didn't know what was going on and thought the were shocking a person in the next room. In the the original motive was to test the difference between “obedience for authority and personal conscientious”(Mcleod) this meant they got a confederate and would see how many volts this individual would give to the volunteer when a question was answered wrong. After conducting this experiment it was very important to see how everyone reacted because you got to see many different emotions of people and weather they stopped at the half way mark or hit the full voltage . In this study Social psychology which means “the scientific study of
The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not
746 Words | 3 PagesStanford Experiment: Unethical or Not Stanford Prison Experiment is a popular experiment among social science researchers. In 1973, a psychologist named Dr. Philip Zimbardo wants to find out what are the factors that cause reported brutalities among guards in American prisons. His aim was to know whether those reported brutalities were because of the personalities of the guards or the prison environment. However, during the experiment, things get muddled unexpectedly. The experiment became controversial since it violates some ethical standards while doing the research.
Stanley Milgram's Controversial Experiments On Obedience
213 Words | 1 PagesShortly after the trails of Adolf Eichmann, Stanley Milgram wanted to know if ordinary people could be influenced to commit hideous atrocities, such as the events that took place during the Holocaust. Would people follow the orders of a person in authority even when it results in the harm of others? Milgram (1963) conducted a series of controversial experiments on the obedience (dependent variable) to authority as a way to test his research question and hypothesis (Shanab, & Yahya, 1978; Milgram, 1974; Milgram, 1963). His original classic experiment became seminal and remains one of the most iconic experiments in social psychology. Milgram used newspaper advertisements to recruit subjects in the New Haven area (n=40 males).
Stella Took The Shawl Away Analysis
507 Words | 3 PagesShe only stood, because if she ran they would shoot…” (4). The guards and the soldiers are symbols for the change of morality. They have the feeling that it is their right to take over other people’s lives such as Magda’s and the prisoners’, who are also damaged physically from the harsh treatment they receive. When looking at Milgram’s experiment, subjects also treat the students as if they were animals: “Of the 40 subjects, 26 obeyed the orders of the experimenter to the end, proceeding to punish the victim until they reached the most potent shock available on the shock generator”(Milgram). Most of the subjects accept the authority even though they knew that it may be dangerous to shock the victims with high voltage.
Milgram's Studies Of Obedience Essay
1105 Words | 5 PagesThere may be several diverse reasons that a person or group may obey clearly immoral commands. Perhaps the most widely known experiment investigating compliance are Milgram’s studies of obedience. Milgram was inspired by the 1961 trial of a Nazi war criminal, Adolf Eichmann. “In the experiment, ordinary people were willing to obey the dictates of an external authority even to the extent of inflicting what they believed were serious and even dangerous shocks to other supposed participants”. Prior to the experiment, experts believed that only 10% of individuals would exceed 180 volts.
Milgram's Justification Of Obedience To Authority
1235 Words | 5 PagesVoluminous research has been conducted in the area of obedience, more specifically how obedient individuals will be in obeying an authority figure even if the authority figure is commanding them to inflict harm or pain onto others. Ordinary people, for many years have inflicted pain onto others under the commands of an authority figure such as during the Holocaust. Probably, the most famous psychological piece of research investigating obedience was that of Milgram (1963). Milgram recruited ordinary males from different backgrounds and occupations, he then created a scenario where the participants were required to follow instructions from a perceived authority figure.
More about What Rationale Does The Author Give For Conducting The Study
Comparing Milgram And Stanford's Psychological Experiments
130 Words | 1 PagesAuthority In The Short Story Antaeus, By Borden Bear
1076 Words | 5 PagesFreshman 15 Discussion Questions
510 Words | 3 PagesStanley Milgram's The Experiment Of Autonomy
745 Words | 3 PagesThe Chameleon Effect Analysis
1623 Words | 7 PagesCompare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment
810 Words | 4 PagesReview Of Stanley Milgram's Obedience Experiments
2634 Words | 11 PagesPsychological Effects Of Bullying
2314 Words | 10 PagesStanley Milgram's Obedience Chapter Summary
503 Words | 3 PagesMilgram Experiment
648 Words | 3 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not
746 Words | 3 PagesStanley Milgram's Controversial Experiments On Obedience
213 Words | 1 PagesStella Took The Shawl Away Analysis
507 Words | 3 PagesMilgram's Studies Of Obedience Essay
1105 Words | 5 PagesMilgram's Justification Of Obedience To Authority
1235 Words | 5 Pages