Walking into a library and scanning the vast place filled with the nostalgic smell of slightly sweaty paper and the low hum of children is a scene that is very familiar to me. Especially when I was a child I was devoted to reading, often checking out more than half a dozen books at a time. With the rise in the usage of the Internet, it has changed how society views public libraries and physical literature. However, public libraries hold a very important place in society and their future service should be, as it has always been, a haven and an educational opportunity for both children and adults.
When you think about a library, you think about going in and scanning for books, however those are not the only educational opportunities given
…show more content…
Libraries are a safe place where they are, “an institution of education for democratic living” (“Library Bill of Rights” 1948, p. 284) (Source A). A place where for decades it led to quiet spaces for learning. TechCrunch’s article excerpt from a technology industry news publisher is heavily biased and incorrect, “And now, with e books, I’m guessing the main reason to go to a library on a college campus is simply because it’s a quiet place to study” (Source E). This online publisher values having successful advances in technology and education, however, does not acknowledge the privileges of a library. Libraries, being safe havens to study, would simply not exist if libraries were not a type of institution that was supported by the government. Not only having a quiet place to study and a place where there are knowledgeable peers and librarians to assist you, is a wonderful opportunity and not something to scoff at. The values of this privileged writer do not consider a world where it might not be as easy and turning towards the laptop on your table to search for information. The idiocrasy of these statements stems from a privileged population, that likely does not value what libraries are at their core, an institution for education and
Recently books have been stereotyped as being old-fashioned or outdated. However, this major role change is unrealistic. As we know today, books are not outlawed and firefighters have the job of putting out fires rather than starting them. Even though books are becoming more and more forgotten, there are hundreds or thousands of people who care about literature and would never let it disappear forever.
Kelsey Brown Professor Fenicle ENG 121-4F3 3 December 2017 Synthesis Essay Among many colleges, students are using mind enhancement drugs to improve their performance in class. When a person uses the drugs (i.e. Adderall, Ritalin), it tricks their brain into rewarding itself for doing an unpleasant task which helps the user get more done (Matthew, Glaser, Gerhardt). College students are known to use these drugs for writing papers late at night or for taking exams.
Synthesis Essay As a senior with six months to go until graduation, looking back on the last 13 years of school there has been good and bad things. Conformity was never really a big problem in my school. Students never had to wear the same thing or eat the same thing at lunch. We always could kind of do things our own way, but also follow the rules at the same time.
Although many students may not agree with the banning of books some students do think that some high school books don’t belong in a high school library. Shequoya Jones said “ I don’t think that all books belong in school libraries because some of the books have explicit language and material that some readers are not ready for. Also, you can attain the same books in the public library if you really want them”. This demonstrates students are not always prepared for the content inside the books, even when reading the back of the book. Andre Jones said “Even when reading the back of the book it doesn’t give me the specifics of the explicitness of book”.
One hundred and eighty days per year. Five days per week. Fifty minutes per day. This is the amount of time an English teacher has to educate their students in one school year alone. In this short period, English teachers should be allowed to teach the curriculum they see fit for their students.
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.
Ray Bradbury depicts a future society in Fahrenheit 451 where reading is viewed as harmful and pointless. The government's decision to burn books did not come out of nowhere; rather, it was made after the populace as a whole ceased reading and lost interest in censorship. This begs the question of whether such a scenario is conceivable in the society we live in now and whether reading and books might experience a complete loss of interest. Furthermore, a complete loss of interest in reading and books in our society is impropobable concerns have been raised regarding the reading habits and the emergence of digital media.
At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.
Books should not be banned from schools and libraries, everyone should be allowed to be informed on what’s happening in the world and learn about diversity, despite a book having unpopular views. Opponents claim that all books should be monitored and banned if they give off unpopular opinion or can possibly hurt the public. 1.) One
In a Seattle Times Interview Bradbury says, “You don’t have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them.” People are slowly stopping to reading and it will soon become nothing because people are consumed by their phones. As people’s attention has been shifted towards technology, public libraries and bookstores are slowly disappearing.
“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.
Intro 1: What if your young child is looking through a book at your public library and comes across a topic that was way too mature for their mind set. Would you be okay with it? A big controversial issue that has been going on in the past year is if books should be banned. Now, no one is trying to banish libraries across the globe but people have requested to ban books that are inappropriate. This matter has grown to be worse because everyone has an opinion.
“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.
Everyone knows that reading is important, but have you ever asked yourself why is that so? Reading is one of the most beneficial and practical activities that a human being can do. Unfortunately it is a disappointment that people these days read less. As we know, books were the main source of entertainment centuries ago, but with the widespread of technological advances such as the cinema, television, internet, among others, many people left their books on the bookshelf. The purpose of this speech is to present the benefits and the importance of reading.