Over the years in work with children and families, have applied and used the following theories and practices: • applied theoretical frameworks that explain certain aspects of the world (e.g., social systems theory, human development theory, non-oppressive theory, social development theory and attachment theory). • Used perspectives frameworks, which offer lenses through which to view client situations (e.g., strengths perspective, ecological perspective, and diversity perspective). • employed practice theories and models to guide practice (e.g., crisis intervention, empowerment model and cognitive behavioral
Operating from a theory will help me to remain focused on therapeutic goals and allow for more in-depth processing. In addition, biases can be managed more effectively while adhering to guidelines directing me to appropriate responses. I think counseling without a theoretical perspective is like going on a road trip without a map. After learning about many of the theories, the strategic family therapy seems to click with me the most. When I get chance, I am going to do additional research on this approach and ask questions as needed. By looking up videos of this approach I can begin to learn more in depth about what this theory looks like in practice.
Conclusion Family work practice is one of important element in CAFS. Working with families would not be separated from treatments for those children and youth who are suffering from serious mental, and alcohol and drug issues. The family is the fundamental unit of society, and it has huge direct and indirect impacts on child’s development. There is possibility that the child could be exposed to risks. With family intervention including psychoeducation and family therapies, practitioners are able to offer opportunities to gain more understanding of mental health and coping strategies to the clients and their families.
Thyer (2012), in HBSE, expresses the importance in applying theories to cases, such as in the Jarvis Family. Some of the many reasons include: giving the social worker a starting point in explaining and predicting the clients’ behaviors and giving a perspective of the clients’ situation in order to apply an appropriate intervention. One of the many theories that can be apply to the Jarvis Family case is the Systems Theory. Issues Within the
The book "Integrative Family Therapy" by David C. Olsen proposes that a family therapist must include various family therapy models and approaches in their practice. Based on the author’s extensive experience in the field of family therapy, he emphasizes the importance of tailoring therapy to the unique requirements of different families. He advocates for an integrative approach to therapy that extracts techniques from various theories. He suggests that by calculating the "deep structures" of each theory, one can better understand their underlying assumptions on how to integrate these methods into treatment. This aids the counselor in identifying commonalities, differences, and gaps in their understanding to develop a more effective treatment plan for each family's unique needs.
As stated by Trotter (2013), “The Collaborative Family Work model draws particularly on three key principles: problem-solving…pro-social modelling…and role clarification” (p. 54). Skilled welfare practitioners can provide assistance to clients experiencing difficulties within their family dynamic. Trotter’s (2013) Collaborative Family Work model offers strategies working with families and involuntary clients, with the emphasis of collaboration between practitioner and family members in developing strategies for learning new skills to improve their lives and situation. The model also prioritises the choice of goals which are set by the family members to resolve issues through therapy using strategies such as Trotter’s (2013) RIDGES process which
The Practice of Generalist Social Work (3rd ed.), New York, New York: Routledge. Cameron, M. & King Keegan, E. (2010). The common factors model: Implications for transtheoretical clinical social work practice. Social Work, 55, 63-73. Heather Larkin , Brooke A. Beckos & Joseph J. Shields (2012) Mobilizing Resilience and Recovery in Response to Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE): A Restorative Integral Support (RIS) Case Study, Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 40:4, 335-346, DOI: 10.1080/10852352.2012.707466 Robbins, S., Chatterjee, P., &Canda, E. (2012).
Upon closing this course, the two most appealing theories and therapies that can be identified with is the experiential theory and the structural theory. These two theories both have similarities and differences among them, but for the most part, share similar standards when being used in a family therapy session. The similarities and differences that they have are the assumptions of the theory, concepts, goals of the therapy session, the role of the therapist, assessments used, interventions used, changes, when termination is necessary, self of the therapist, and the evaluations of them. The first comparison between experiential theory and structural theory is the assumptions of the two theories.
An educator needs to follow all principles including never harming children, using appropriate assessment systems and building individual relationships with each child. When working with the families, educators need to maintain confidentiality when discussing anything about their child. They need to inform the families of any policy decisions and when appropriate, involve them in the decision making. Providing the families with activity sheets outlining what their child experienced each day will also show the families that you are paying attention to their child’s needs. CS-VI-a:
Counseling Theories The various clinicians at my practicum site maneuvered through different counseling theories depending on the needs of the child. I spent most of my practicum developing coping skills, coming up with plans of action, and assessing crisis situation. To effectively counsel each resident I used a theory known as Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS). Collaborative Problem Solving deal with children with emotional, social, and behavioral issues and assesses it from a developmental perspective (Greene, Ablon, 2006).
Strengths based approach focuses on the capacities and potentialities of clients. All human transcend circumstances, to develop one`s power to overcome adversity, to stand up and be counted (Dennis Saleebey 2002). The Strength based practioner works in a collaborative manner with the families and children to discover a child’s strength. Build on a fundmental belief that the families and the child have talents which can be utilized to find a lasting solution. The skills which many arise from theoretical ideas
It regularly takes years, once in a while decades, when a discipline experiences a paradigm shift, until the theory gains substantial ground to end up for the most part acknowledged and executed in the field. The theory experiences changes and adjustments where it is affected by cultural and political factors, and interacts with other philosophies in the territory of intrigue. The idea of family-centered adopted from Carl Roger’s work in the 1940s with families of “problem” children (Rogers, 1939). In the mid-1960s, the Association for the Care of Children in Hospitals embraced Carl Roger’s idea to advance a more holistic approach for hospitalized kids care, especially in terms of psycho social issues and family inclusion. This parent advocacy
History The strengths based practice model puts to use an individual’s personal strengths to aid in recovery, empowerment, and a humanistic notion that people can change and grow (Hepworth et al, 2013, p.274). The strength based practice approach also focuses on a person’s strengths and self-determination. The goal of this model is to build upon inherent strengths of a family or individual that is being assessed. The strengths perspective demands a different way of looking at people, communities and even families in which the social worker seeks to develop in their client the natural abilities and capabilities needed to improve their situation (Saleebey & Dennis, 1996).
As a Social Work student understanding attachment theory along with my own attachment style is very important because I can use this knowledge as a tool during my assessment process when working with clients. Description of Four Attachments Styles a) SECURE ATTACHMENT, is a relationship that gets developed during infancy between parents and babies, where parents should provide a sense of safety and security to their babies, also be attentive to their emotions by soothing them when they feel stress, giving them joy and calmness and lastly offering them a secure environment for them to explore (Divecha, 2017). “Secure attached children are able to regulate their emotions, feel more confident in exploring their
Another theory which is applicable to Keisha and James is entitled Systems Theory. Systems Theory provides a Social Worker with the tools to be able to examine the individual service user in their social environment (Friedman & Allan, 2014). This is particularly important in this case as the relevant interventions to safeguard James and Keisha must be based upon their environment they are in due to this being the root of the challenges they are facing. The advantage of Systems Theory is that it does not view service-users in isolation but appreciates that they are often the product of their relationships with others, thus, this theory is functionalist in nature and would view the family in this case as a broken unit which is in need of intervention in order to determine better outcomes for the future (Walker, 2012; Friedman & Allan, 2014).
For example, there is confusion as to what these terms developmental social work actually mean in practice and this has limited its application (Patel and Hochfeld, 2012). The terms social development, developmental social welfare and developmental social work are very familiar in social work hence confusing practitioners. According to a study by Patel & Hochfeld (2012) in an attempt to explain what developmental social work and social work mean, respondents idetified key concepts that influence their understanding of developmental social work such as empowerment; capacity building development; and participation. These are concepts that match established social work conventions in that they are commonly used in individual and community empowerment practice.