Delimitations factors includes the choices of objective ,research questions , perspective that you adopted, variables of interests and population you choose to investigate. The problem of choice that one chooses is the first delimitation itself. This means you had other related problems that you could have chosen but decide to screen them off and took one from many. PERSONAL ASPECT Delimitations as one the concepts in research are of vital purpose. It guides you so that you don’t derail from what you intend to do it explains or defines on why you carrying on such a study so that one does not lose track of its purpose.
Anny, the inductive approach is appropriate for investigate the research topic. Firstly, it makes more sense to ask the questions that directly linking to the research objective, and then analyzing the data towards problem solving. For instance, in order to find out whether lacking of the knowledge and/or awareness of forecasting is an important cause for inaccuracy forecasting, structured interviews with people who are responsible for forecasting can be designed. Hence, the researcher can better understand what was going on and the nature of the problem. Meanwhile, by analyzing the interview data, the researcher may discover that there are other important reasons that lead to inaccurate forecasting.
- in cases of some uncertainty about the results, so repeat analys data using a reasonable range of results for studies (ex. because of inconsistencies in how the results are reported that cannot be resolved by contacting the investigators, or because of differences in how outcomes are defined or measured). - Reanalysing data imputing is a reasonable range of values for missing data . - Reanalysing the data by using different statistical approaches (ex. use the random effect model instead of a fixed effect)
Engaging in scientific method means you will have to observe. Through observation, an idea has been formulated already but still needs more research about it. Only then, you can form a hypothesis regarding all the collected data. To test the hypothesis' credibility is through experiment. If the results did align with the hypothesis, only then will it be considered as a verified data.
Energies are engaged to systematically develop theory, but the two approaches to the research task is different. The qualitative researcher's emphasis is on the construction of the theory to agree with data, and the quantitative researcher's emphasis is on the testing of the theory to prove. The difference in approach may, in part, be due to the differences in the phenomena being studied, and the questions asked and the techniques considered appropriate for confirming or refuting the conjecture (Morse, 1996). Qualitative research requires methodological versatility; researchers have to create the knowledge fitting their research group through any of numerous strategies that depends on design, and therefore have an extensive knowledge of social science theory, to interact competently with others, and persistently focus on objective, and single-mindedly commit to research. He/she, the researcher must constantly distinguish between another's world and that of the participant researcher, and yet become close enough to the lives of another that it be both experienced and analyzed
Task 4 In-club to produce an empirical and highly practical research , the research worker must use a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches; the researcher must consider which of the diverse methods used in research are most appropriate for the probe and answering of the head . The option of methods and the way in which they are implemented will largely be determined by the research question , but will also be influenced by practical consideration, such as material handiness . Research may involve either empirical data (“fact” identified within a pre specified conceptual view) or conceptual data. Empirical inquiry is often adding up answer to describe situation or to test theory . Conceptual research is often development and arranging conceptual understandings
The researcher is researching aspects of private lives of people and putting the findings available to the public, so it gives rise to numerous ethical issues, and the researcher has to be in a position to apply principles, rules and guidelines into the research study. Besides this, the free flowing, flexibility and inductive chanciness distinguish qualitative study. Fantasy or fact is an issue because the researcher is the main tool in qualitative study and the data are words, which are interpreted and analyzed by the researcher, and reality, which is studied, may be contradictory, incoherent and contradictory. It is challenging because the procedures of organizing and analyzing the data depend on insight, inference, logic, and consequently, with hard work and creativity of the researcher, so that the outcomes come forth as an intelligible whole.
quantitative methodology. Finally, addition to explanatory analysis that hypothetical statement would be prove through this correlation analysis. Whether, those services have badly impact or not on Democratic accountability and overall social wellbeing of the ordinary people who are living in most peripheral society. 4.3 Research Methodology Research methodology is most important part of the Research project. It should be carefully decided according to research problem and hypothetical prediction of the research.
In case the research is on a hypothesis and test of this hypothesis using data is known as the deductive approach. In deductive approach researcher develop a theoretical or conceptual framework and then test this theory using literature review and collecting the data. The other type of research is inductive research in which the researcher develops the theory after analyzing the data. In inductive research there is a clearly defined research question and objective and researcher explore the literature. Inductive method of research will be applied for the case study of WCC as the research question has already been defined.
Cruz, Rochell Marie R, BSBA FTM 4-2 Writing Chapter 2 In order for you as a researcher be called a researcher, you just have to research and review about related literature. This is vital because this is where you can get your ideas and somehow can improve your study. It is very important because this will serves you as a guide in making your research. The purpose of the study should suggest some theoretical framework to be explained further in this chapter. The literature review thus describes and analyzes previous research on the topic.