CHAPTER II Archetypal criticism The roots of archetypal criticism Archetypal criticism is a type of literary criticism that focuses on particular narrative patterns, archetypes, motifs, themes or characters that recur in a particular literary work or in literature in general. Archetypal criticism has its basis in the application of concepts developed in psychoanalysis and in mythology to the study of literature. The main tendency of this approach to criticism resembles to the early conception of form in Western thought. Collective unconscious lays beneath the personal conscious and personal unconscious. As Jung said, the collective unconscious is ‘‘a storehouse of knowledge, experiences, and images of the human race. It is a racial memory, …show more content…
Archetypal criticism is also concerned with how patterns of culture, beliefs, tradition, and inborn images affects literature. It renders the idea that certain symbols represent the same ideas no matter the place or time. Writers use symbols in their works in order to strike readers’ unconscious. This kind of symbols recur often enough in literature to be recognizable as an element of one’s literary experience as a whole. Archetypal criticism also deals with symbolism of nature and the cosmos. There must be universality in literature, anthropology, psychology. It originated in the 1930s and 1940s, and continued to flourish in the 1950s and 1960s. Psychological and anthropological studies of the late 19th century and early 20th century lighted the beginning of this criticism. Information provided from the findings of past cultures influenced many prominent writers. Moreover, authors used in their writings the idea of myths from the Greek and Roman …show more content…
To recognize the collective unconscious is to become self-actualised. The anima or animus is the archetype through which we can communicate with our collective unconsciousness. This archetype is responsible for the love in our lives. The anima is represented by the female aspect present in the collective unconscious of every man and the animus represents the male aspect that exists in the collective unconscious of every woman. The anima may appear as a witch, a young girl or even the earth mother, every time an intuitive or spontaneous character. The animus may be personified as a certain male, a sorcerer, a wise old man, every time a rational, logical character. The self is the psychic centre or the soul of the individual. The whole archetypal system of the unconscious, the personality and individual’s ego make up the self. The self is symbolized by the circle, the cross or the mandala figures. The ego represents the conscious mind developed after birth. The shadow is the dark side of the ego, the evil that individuals are capable of, an amoral side, neither good nor bad, an animalist characteristic, and the part of us that we are not used to admit
The shadow self archetype represents the traits that one doesn’t like in themselves or even tries to cover up. The shadow self of Pi is especially shown when Pi retells his story toward the end of the book. His story reveals that instead of the tiger eating the hyena, since Pi is revealed as Richard Parker, Pi really killed and ate the french cook. This is quite surprising since Pi is a vegetarian but his will to live and anger at the chef for killing one close to Pi overcomes him. We also see this is a shadow self since Pi used a tiger to describe that part of himself instead of admitting it was him.
By that, he intends to teach that patterns are certain phenomena that reoccur in different literary work which can be explicated further by acquiring a neutral perspective towards the story. For giving a comprehensive example in order to explain what a pattern is, the author proposes Oedipal Complex, which is the condition of a male child who feels sexual desire towards his mother. He argues that a professional who has observed this situation on several cases would force his or her memory to find the resemblances between these cases and realise that it is a pattern. Indeed, that is what Freud did before introducing the concept Oedipus Complex to the world. Likewise, D. H. Lawrence noted this pattern and built his story, ‘The Rocking Horse Winner’ on the same basis.
The poet, Lascelles Abercrombie once said, “There is only one thing which can master the perplexed stuff of epic material into unity; and that is, an ability to see in particular human experience some significant symbolism of man 's general destiny.”. He talked about how powerful of a tool symbolism is and how it is the only thing that can truly define a highly complex ‘destiny’ or series of events. Symbolism is something that is found throughout Harper Lee’s book, To Kill a Mockingbird. Lee shows the reader that racism is a product of society,she portrays the matter through her symbolism of the mad dog, the birds and the bugs.
When reading a novel, readers do not often realize that many authors use the same types of characters and symbols. Applying a literary lens to a novels can help readers better understand why a novel was written. A literary theory is, “A term for analyzing, classifying, defining, interpreting, and evaluating literature” (Davidson). When observing a piece of literature with an Archetypal lens analysts can identify these patterns. According to Literary Devices, “In literature, an archetype is a typical character, an action, or a situation that seems to represent universal patterns of human nature” (literarydevices).
However, looking beyond what is initially shown, a new context can adhered to the plot. Carl Jung’s theory of archetypal patterns delves into the human psyche by analyzing its parts. According to Jung, the human mind is split into three different parts; the ego, the personal unconscious, and the collective unconscious- which can be split into many different archetypes that impact personality (McLeod). Oates uses archetypes and symbolism to show the battle of a young girl trying make her own home and identity in a world that
Symbolism in American Literature In American Literature or any type of literature, the author may use symbols to represent a distinct concept. Types of symbols could include: colors, water, fire, seasons, etc. In this paper symbolism will be pulled from Into the wild by Jon Krakauer, The Crucible by Arthur Miller and The Narrative of The Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave. These three works of literature are all influenced by the concept explained in How to read Literature like a Professor by Thomas C. Foster. Into the wild, Krakauer’s nonfiction, biography is about a young traveler, Chris McCandless, who sets out on an adventure to pursue his dreams by hitchhiking to Alaska.
How can archetypes be capable of having such a colossal impact on the meaning of a movie? Although there is not a simple answer to this question, there are, in fact, many factors to be considered. In the movie Finding Nemo, there are several archetypes that resemble universal patterns of humankind. These patterns originate from a few ideas; however, they can be exhibited differently across literature. This idea is best presented by Carl Jung, a Swiss psychologist.
This is shown when the characters in this novel speak out against a concept they know nothing about. Therefore, the literary terms an author uses can make an immense impact to the connections the reader makes to a novel, and help to shape a theme that is found throughout
The argument of whether or not a human has a soul has been argued throughout centuries. Derek Parfit discusses two separate theories of personal identity, Ego Theory and Bundle Theory. The argument of which present a more accurate account of personhood is very hard to determine. The Ego Theory has some flaws such the soul is separate from the body and is a immaterialist object within us. Bundle Theory is reinforced and proven by the split-brain case, however it can lead to the argument that there is no self.
In Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral” he writes a story about a husband's journey to his epiphany. Robert, a blind man, teaches the husband how to see without his eyes. Often a person with the ability to see takes this for granted, leaving them only to see what is on the outside rather than seeing people, and things for what they really are. In this short story, Carver conveys the narrators epiphany through the symbol of the cathedral. Carver develops a story with symbolism throughout his story, beginning with the first line, “This blind man, an old friend of my wife’s
Shadow theory is the understanding and analyzation of characteristics that the subject is unaware of: weaknesses, repressed ideas, desires, instincts, and shortcomings. The side of a any given personality which is not consciously displayed in public may have positive or negative qualities, and this is the Shadow self. When the Shadow remains unconscious, it causes problems for the person that holds that Shadow and the people that interact with them. Baker believes, “The Shadow self also embodies many darker aspects of the main character’s personality as well as deeply repressed impulses that aren’t always conspicuous to the reader” (1). When reading Hamlet, readers may not pick up on Hamlet’s Shadow.
A narrative critic’s close reading assumes literary integrity and reads the text holistically. The text is processed consecutively and the parts are related to the whole. The methodology of narrative criticism can be summarized in four steps. First, the form of the text is analysed and categorized according to formal and conventional literary aspects and genres.
It is one of Freud’s most remarkable contribution and is the essential to interpret his perspective of the behaviour and the issues of personality. The unconscious is made up of those impulses, ideas, beliefs, rationale, and events that are kept out of our realization as a defence against anxiety. Freud believed that majority human conduct is influenced by external forces. The things we do in everyday life is usually formed by these unconscious purpose and needs.
The unconscious is somewhat repressed while still having the power to influence our actions and emotions we have towards the past and
Carl Jung refers to the human psyche as both the conscious and unconscious parts of the mind. He believes that the conscious attitudes within one’s mind are ideally balanced with the unconscious attitudes. The unconscious expresses ideas through dreams, imagery, fantasies, slips of the tongue and various other involuntary acts (Snowden 56). Jung expressed a varied perspective when it came to the components of the psyche. He divided the psyche intro three components, the conscious, the personal unconscious and the collective