In order to stay flourishing in the time of unprecedented change the company should state clearly its problems and implement organizational development techniques. The following are some major obstacles encountered by the company “UPS” throughout its
So, adapting to change is vital to my personal growth. Now, to help others, it is simply to get them understand that life, whether in a business or personal, is bound to encounter change and the ability to adapt to change would determine the improvement of their business. Adapting to change is a leadership strategy that I have applied in various ways. For instance, the nature of my work requires a lot of flexibility. Changes could occur before I realize it so it is imperative to often anticipate changes and learn to cope with it.
I would use the contingency theory of management to help me and my team to make decisions. I would also use the systems theory of management to help the team to realize that one decision can affect the entire system of things (Haber, 2014). Using a complexity theory of management can help to have the whole team realize that changing things can help or move the objective decision away from the original goal. A clever work environment and having certain behaviors can help
To motivate the employees toward achieving the six sigma top management should introduce rewards which will motivate the other employees. When organization decided to implement six sigma there will be lot of changes in the organizational strategy and policies, management should identify the changes to ensure the organization in the right direction. Thus leader and management have to play a crucial role every stages in six sigma and "failing which means not lead to planned benefits in terms of Cost saving, revenue, customer satisfaction, employee morale and so many other parameters"(whatissixsigma.net,
The researcher in this case is Nielsen, who needs to be aware of the possible issues arising with potential change and also of his own contribution in understanding how change affects his organization. The spiral begins by conducting new research; this can either be an issue, a concern or an opportunity, all disguised as change. For the leader to effectively implement the change he firstly needs to learn and understand if his organization has the capacity to accept the change, in regards to their timetable as well as their staff number. A good idea is for Nielsen to talk with his employees, who actually do the work, to get a realistic feeling regarding the desired change and understand how large the change capacity is. Leaders tend to forget the humanly aspect of workload, and might push employees to overwork, which can cause unmotivated staff as well as poorer performance level.
The need to close the financial cycle and increase the overall production (from an enterprise standpoint) are included under Productivity improvements. Strategic considerations to implement new strategies which are not supported by the current software help improve customer service and satisfaction, these things respond to competitive responsiveness. Follow Software Process or Customize? This is the key decision which determines the success or failure of the ERP effort. If the organization decides to follow the process of the software, then we can say that the organization is following the best practices within its sector.
The main issue is that would it say it is a decent thing decreasing the customization characteristics? The test confronted when actualizing customization into ERP is that on the grounds that the current undertaking asset arranging had have a fix interface for the client in this manner there's a restriction to customization. Customization was expected to enhance the capacities of an ERP framework by permitting it to help each sort and size of business however by and by, cutting edge ERP arrangements incorporate pertinent peculiarities and apparatuses that give organizations the straightforwardness in overseeing key information, for example, content, date and number records. Through a led examination, they gave the cutting edge ERP framework eventually to figure out if it can stay aware of the current performance of their business, and they decide to tweak in the long run at whatever point it is important to do so. Truth be told, it was uncommon for entrepreneurs to depend on their ERP software as it is without performing any personalization errand that is expected to match the framework with their industry or business profile.
During strategic information provision, top executives explain why changes are necessary and define their expectations from these changes projects, whereas during operational information provision, direct supervisors clarify roles and responsibilities during change processes and new requirements, if any, after the change and answer questions. It is worth noting that peer talk can be a driver of change initiatives (Frahm and Brown, 2005, cited in Peus et al., 2009). This may be at least partly because one takes on the attributes of one's colleagues. Noticeable, when change happens, people move through the phases of shock, denial, resistance and acceptance at different speeds (Lecture 7, slide 38). We recommend that
In a macro viewpoint, top-down and bottom-up project governance are both required to project implementation, in other words, the success of project deliverables reply on positive executive board outcomes as well as subordinate body effectiveness. Therefore the scheduled staff training and reward system setting is necessary to arouse employee motivation. Moreover, the entire CATA4 acts focus on the way of changing business project, neglecting leadership and stakeholder relatively. This study attempts to analyze appropriate leadership style and stakeholder engagement, whereas the relationship between the leadership and organizational culture is undefined. Further, the managerial implication to CATA4 comes from SLM, which diagnoses leadership weaknesses within CATA4.
Redesign the process, “this process is going to redesign the process to eliminate the problems you are going to identified.” It is best to work with the people who are directly involved in the process. The ideas may reveal new approaches, and also, they’re more likely to buy into change if they have been at an early stage. Just make sure that everyone will understand what the process is meant to