There are some people out there that believe there is one reason why people commit crime and that is because they are genetically predisposed to it. In my opinion, I could never be able to fathom the thought that there is one specific reason why people commit crime. I also believe crime has a lot to do with how someone is brought up and the environment they are in. It is hard for me to believe that there are people out there that are just born with a predisposition to commit crime. Committing crime to me isn’t necessarily always a bad thing.
Some criminological theories assert that individuals are born criminals while others maintain that individuals are made criminals as a consequence of the environment they are immersed in. In fact, biological theories of crime take on the perspective that crime is innate, genetic, or caused by brain abnormalities. Sociological theories of crime, on the other hand, contend that environmental factors such as poverty and who individuals associate with directly contribute to criminal behaviour. The view that crime is genetic, the nature theory, strongly opposes the view that crime occurs due to the environment individuals are exposed to, the nurture theory. Although biological theories of crime contend that individuals engage in criminality as
The opportunity for a one-time juvenile delinquent to have their record expunged would probably come at the end of a chapter in their life that they would like to forget. At one time or another in our childhood, we did some things that we were not proud of and would want to forget. For the most part, we did it out of immaturity or simply not considering the consequences of our actions. I have come across a lot of juveniles in my life and even some adults were the only thing that separates my story from their story, is one or two bad decisions. I have come across criminals who have had similar or better childhoods than myself.
Why do some people commit crimes, whereas others obey the laws their entire life. Criminology is the study of crime and punishment. One theory of criminology emphasizes on the biological contradistinctions between people and how it might affect their liability to become criminals. I have noticed that some people eventually end up in the criminal justice system, while others don 't. What makes there two groups of people different from each other?
For the past years there has been a debate on whether juveniles should be tried as life without parole or life with parole. In my opinion juveniles who commit first or second degree murder should not receive a mandatory sentence to life without parole. Although the juveniles are underage they are well informed of what’s right and what’s wrong, but some of them have difficulty understanding of what they are doing at the moment of the crime because they are angry and act before thinking clearly. I agree with the majority of supreme court justices who believe that mandatory life sentences are unconstitutional, unfair and inhumane because juveniles are immature, their brain is not completely developed, and they are unaware of long term impact
From school age children to the elderly, being a victim yourself it can be passed on without even knowing what you are doing. Many child abuse cases are a product of being abused at some point during their lives by a parent or another person. Also, theft often starts during younger years as a result of lack of material things other children may have. But either way it all falls in the category of crime and if caught the label of criminal will then follow you. Children are labeled as a “Bad child” or “Troubled Kid” in their toddler years and because of this they may feel this is all they will ever be.
Non offending mother and father not most effective ought to assist their youngsters get over maltreatment, but additionally need to address their personal complicity in permitting the maltreatment to arise, or in failing to apprehend the signs and symptoms of abuse of their children. The presence of toddler abuses and neglect in a network reflects attitudes about toddler rearing, punishment, and popularity of violence as a solution to issues.” (pop center.org) ultimately, because many types of child maltreatment are crimes, and due to the fact the effects of infant abuse and overlook consist of delinquency, substance abuse, and violence, efforts to lessen the prevalence of toddler abuse and neglect are important to lengthy-term public health and public protection efforts
The majority of Supreme Court cases that result in the death penalty are mostly to protect people from these people who can go out into the world and hurt others because they have been released instead of kept in prison. Most of the children who are sentenced to these life sentences have committed murder that we would normally not believe a child their age could do. The children who commit these crimes are well aware of what is wrong and what is right or else a lot more kids would be committing crimes. The children who are sentenced to shorter sentences run the risk of being the same without having some sort of counseling, they could grow up to be criminals, and the children could influence others to do similar crimes if they are released.
In another case it can be argued that some people are born with a natural instinct to do bad things. This would be arguing that a serial killer was born a serial killer, and that they were born with the instinct to do bad things. People are born good, and there are many studies to suggest so. There is more evidence that suggests that humans are born with the natural instinct to do good things. Imagine that you are holding a newborn baby.
Drug abuse is a major problem throughout the world. Drugs can influence the everyday lives of people, whether they be users, dealers, drug-related crime victims, or the friends and family of a person affected. Violent crime, prostitution, government corruption, and more can all have a link to narcotics. Much of the world, including the United States, try to stop these effects of illicit drugs by focusing on stricter laws and enforcement. Yet this this approach may be counterproductive.
Nuture isn’t the only thing that affects a serial killer. Many serial killers are affected by nature just like some are affected by nurture. Nature isn’t the most common effect, but it does play its part in creating a psychopath. Antisocial attitudes, values and beliefs, and negative family experiences and low levels of school or vocational achievement (Dawn Wissman, 2013). “It is also important to note that the "triad of evil" that has historically been used to identify social behavior typical of a serial killer is incorrect.” (Dawn Wissman, 2013).
The ego is the decision making that works based off of reason and logic rather than the id which runs of impulses and illogical reasoning.A damage ego leads to a person being unable to reason with themselves about the things they are doing. A damage ego is most often something a person is born with rather then evolving into so it would lead to the fact that a person is born a serial killer. Genes can cause you to become a killer.Some killers are born with a gene that makes them more likely to commit violent acts.Some people live their lives differently than others and grow up differently those who grow up with more of a unsuitable household can grow to be a serial killer. Chemical imbalances in there brain. Some people suffer from psychological disorders which can cause motives to kill.
I can agree with most part, but I have concern about persons who have been convicted of any felony. What happen when the spouse convicted a shoplift felony when he/she was young and already received punishment under the law? To me, it doesn’t sound fair to judge someone qualification of the role base on maybe a small mistake from the pass. Also, I think there should be some kind of standard or investigation to decedent’s family on moral turpitude. Since there is no a valid Will, I think the court should do a little bit more to appoint the right person on decedents