In this paper, I argue against Government Surveillance. Although a society full of cameras could help solve some crimes, it is also true that the Constitution, through the fourth amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Despite the fact that this is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law should be monitored. In addition, increasing political surveillance with the excuse of protection against war or enemies only fuels the fact that innocent people’s lives are being monitored. Finally, the information collected by the mass internet surveillance programs could be used for other harmful purposes since hackers could gain access to the databases and sell the information to other companies or terrorist groups.
Government…show more content… "The Future of Big Data." Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. N.p., 19 July 2012. Web. 7 Mar. 2017.
Gallington, Daniel J. "The Case for Internet Surveillance." U.S. News & World Report. U.S. News & World Report, 18 Sept. 2013. Web. 03 Mar. 2017.
Gjelten, Tom. "The Effects Of The Snowden Leaks Aren 't What He Intended." NPR. NPR, 20 Sept. 2013. Web. 15 Mar. 2017.
Honorof, Marshall. "How the NSA 's Spying Keeps You Safe." Tom 's Guide. Tom 's Guide, 12 Sept. 2013. Web. 5 Mar. 2017.
"Mass government surveillance pros and cons: NSA spying." Netivist.org. N.p., 7 July 2014. Web. 03 Mar. 2017.
Pincus, Walter. "Oversight board says NSA data mining puts citizens ' privacy at risk but sees no abuse." The Washington Post. WP Company, 14 July 2014. Web. 7 Mar. 2017.
Francis, David. "5 Reasons Why The NSA 's Massive Surveillance Program Is No Big Deal (And 2 Reasons It Is)." Business Insider. Business Insider, 11 June 2013. Web. 10 Apr. 2017.
Greenwald, Glenn. "NSA collecting phone records of millions of Verizon customers daily." The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 06 June 2013. Web. 15 Apr.