There is nothing wrong with hunting for survival. Mankind has hunted animals large and small for hundreds of centuries. Hunting for sport should also be acceptable, with the appropriate rules, guidelines, and limitations. This past year the killing of a Cecil, a lion living in a protected reservation in Africa sparked a great deal of debate in regards to trophy hunting. The issue of the debate was whether it is morally justifiable to kill animals for sport. Proponents of trophy hunting claim that killing for sport generates revenue for impoverished countries and supports conservation. Opponents of trophy hunting argued that trophy hunting has further decreased the already dwindling amount of endangered and nearly endangered species, as it …show more content…
Trophy hunting has potential to have significant negative impacts on those animals that have drastically dwindling populations. According to the International Fund for Animal Welfare, “the latest surveys estimate that there are fewer than 40,000 wild lions in Africa today, a century ago there were 200,000 lions” (International Fund for Animal Welfare). The Smithsonian also weights in on the issue and reports, “loss of habitat and decline of prey species are huge factors which, in turn, mean increased lion conflicts with livestock herders—and, often, dead lions; and as numbers drop, the gene pool is dwindling, causing inbreeding and weakened immune systems” (Bland). What may or may not come as the biggest surprise is that wealthy American citizens have contributed significantly to such declines. The International Fund also claims at “least 5,663 lions were traded internationally for trophy hunting purposes. More than half of these lions were imported to the United States” (International Fund for Animal Welfare). Several studies have demonstrated that excessive trophy harvests have driven population declines. Jeff Flocken of the National Geographic Magazine states that “600 lions are killed every year on trophy hunts. These hunts are unsustainable and put more pressure on the species” (Flocken). The elimination of the male lion, the most sought after trophy by these trophy hunters also has a number of implications after the lion is killed. Flocken notes, “when an adult male lion is killed, the destabilization of that lion's pride can lead to more lion deaths as outside males compete to take over the pride…these males will often kill the cubs sired by the pride's previous leader, resulting in the loss of an entire lion generation within the pride”
In both the article “Permit to Hunt..” and the John Stossel video on Endangered Species both made one point very clear -- in order to save endangered species we have to kill them. The article and the video take this in two very different directions but they are both similar thematically. In the article, the writer talks about the sale of a permit that allows for the buyer to kill one post-breeding black rhino. The $350,000 raised would go on to fund the Namibian Government and their anti-poaching battle.
However I did not agree with some of the sentiments of many people where they wanted to completely destroy the man who hunted Cecil. What he did was wrong, there was no question about t. He was wrong on all fronts, legally and also morally. However attacking him, or the absurd suggestions some were making will not bring back Cecil, so rather donating to charities that make an active effort in stopping these situations from happening is far more productive 2. What is the relationship between nature and “natural”?
Supporters claim that their sport helps conservation efforts and helps bring money to the communities in which they are hunting from. Opposers claim that occasionally there is a fine line between trophy hunting and poaching, because much of it is illegal. They also claim that only a small percent of the money made goes to help conservation efforts, and it causes a decrease in the wild life population. I consider myself as an opposer in most cases. I don’t believe it is our job to decide whether an animal should live or die, and I don’t see how killing an animal is supposed to help the population.
Looking at the outrage with Cecil the lion would make it logical to make poaching and general violence against animals illegal. That's a bit moral of a debate, and as someone who eats meat I feel a bit uncomfortable talking about ethics with animals, but I think killing animals for sport is wrong regardless of what goes on at
Hunting permits cost money. The money raises depending on the size of the game and location. People will bid thousand close to millions just to go hunt a trophy animal as stated on The Rhino Hunter, “paid $350,000 for a hunting trip to Namibia to shoot and kill an endangered species”. Yes sometimes they do go hunt endangered species but what people don’t know is they go hunt the older animals, the animals that bring danger to the rest of the species. These bids all the money that
Their characteristics of being protective when they feel threatens become a reason that people think they are wild and meant to be shot. People are taking their habitats, shrinking their land to a smaller portion, just for building agriculture fields, industrial places and roads. It is not fair for wildlife. Fortunately, some people start to care about those animals, meanwhile a number of agencies held in order to protect them. More people should be aware of that each variety of animal is a crucial role in the balance of the
It's good for the species, if animals aren’t hunted they’ll die of starvation or disease when that food could have been used for meat on the table. It saves money by allowing you to harvest a animal and get about fifty pounds of meat, then buying that meat at the store. It’s also good for your family, hunting teaches the children, one of the greatest life lessons you can teach. There are a few better ways to spend quality time with your family than to take them away from their computer or tv and show them where their food comes from. Hunting is a sport, it challenges your brain and helps you vision when looking for movement.
Hunting has been a part of our society since the first man set foot on this continent, but animal rights movements have become popular in our society recently that has questioned the necessity of hunting in our modern times. Because of this, animal populations are left freely to where they can multiply at an alarming rate. Hunting is a great means of controlling animal populations’ growth, although greatly opposed by many. While hunting is a very controversial topic in our society, there are great points for being for and against it. Hunting is a way that humans see to keep balance of the ecosystem.
In the article ¨ 6 Endangered Animals Poachers Are Hunting Into Extinction,¨ Jessica Phelan describes how the killing of Cecil the Lion decreased the tourism in Zimbabwe due to the hunting. This is just one example of poachers interfering with human life. If more of this continues, humans will be the only living thing on Earth. For elephants, laws have been passed to protect the ivory in their tusks that everyone wants to get hands on. In 2011, one in every 12 African elephants were killed (Phelan).
Everyday, the sun rises in the morning and sets at night, but the debate about hunting always remains on the table. Hunters see their killing of an animal as an achievement, they put food on their tables, or a mount on their wall. Critics see this as a cruel way for a human being to take the life of an innocent animal. In the article “Is hunting a moral? A philosopher unpacks the question” written by Joshua Duclos, examined the question of why people hunt.
Some may disagree that hunting’s purpose is to hunt the animals only and not to destroy their ecosystem which is true sometimes. They agree
Outline THESIS: The concept of the circle of life is a dominant theme in the film reflecting the state of things in the modern society. 1. The Lion King belongs to the trend of detailed naturalism. 2.
Wildlife Conservation is often seen as a bad thing, but if you look at it from my perspective, then it is actually a good thing. People think of it as holding wild animals captive, but we are actually protecting them from poachers. The purpose of Wildlife Conservation is to protect the animals in danger, which I am in agreement 110%. Other people argue that we shouldn’t have conservations, but they don’t know the harm that can happen to unprotected animals.
B. Still, trophy hunters kill roughly 600 of these animals every year, compounding lions ' to other threats, like habitat loss and retaliatory killing as an endangered species. ( Pimm. Pg 2 ) II. Hunting is clearly not the same as is was in the good old days.
Hunting: Cruel and Unnecessary Are you for or against hunting? I am against hunting myself. The reason for this is because there is a study that showed car/deer collisions are actually somewhat caused by hunting. Also they hunt to try to decrease the population when they are actually increasing it. You may disagree with me now but after you read my paper you will be against hunting.