Herbert is asserting Coca Cola’s rights to the “It’s the Real Thing” slogan by expressing how it has been utilizing that slogan since 1942, in order to to further prove to Seaver that “It’s a Real Thing” forms a significant part of the Coca Cola company since its early beginnings. Herbert states the fact that as a company, they have “...national use of ‘It’s the Real Thing’ in the summer of 1969 and it is our main thrust for 1970.” Herbert is supporting Coca Cola’s entitlement to the slogan and reinforcing to Seaver, in a demanding tone, that because the slogan has been an important factor in their advertising for some time, Grove Press should desist from utilizing the “It’s a Real Thing” slogan for their advertisements. Although Herbert attempts
In Richard Seaver’s response to the Coca Cola executive, Ira C. Herbert, he replies in a tranquil manner as if he has no worry of losing the right to the use of the slogan. Grove Press respectfully acknowledges its understanding of Coca Cola’s concern, but state that “by a vote of seven to six” the continued use of the slogan had been decided (lines 17). Throughout the first half of his letter, Seaver repetitively reassures the Coca Cola Company that Grove Press wishes NOT to steal the slogan but rather share it. This repetition is essential to Seaver’s argument as it creates a sense of trust for the reader. Seaver also exemplifies Grove Press’ reasoning through the suggestion that “sales personnel make sure that what the consumer wants is
The authors of this journal discuss the healthcare systems cutbacks and its impact on the population. Every few years the Ontario government and the Ontario Medical Association (OMA) negotiate their contract called The Physician Services Agreement (PSA) The contract details how much physicians can bill for their services, as well as where health care funding should be invested in or where a cut back could be. In March of 2014, the contract had expired, which has led to negotiations for over the year. Over that year negotiations for the new PSA contract had many conflicts mostly due to the government’s goal try to end the province's deficit by 2017-2018.
Mr. Herbert has addressed the issue to the Grove Press about the use of their slogan “It’s the real thing”, which brings the debate of who has ownership. Mr. Herbert wants Coca-Cola to stop using the slogan by using his serious tone and the use of logical appeals. Mr. Seaver, on the other hand, responds to Herbert’s proposal in a satirical tone by using hyperboles and understatement. Since Mr. Herbert is able to put the argument in more realistic terms of this case, it implies that his argument is more persuasive than Mr. Seaver’s.
“Ballistic imaging and microstamping technologies have the potential to reduce gun violence by improving the solve rate of gun-related crimes”(Giffords Law Center). Requiring microstamping and ballistic identification for any and all firearms can help detain and detect the person responsible for any local shootings. Microstamping is a needed adjustment for all firearms. This micro adjustment will enable us to find more evidence that police cannot in crime scenes and help find and track exactly which gun fired the bullet. In a blog posted by Towne Currier he explains the reason for this certain development: “The development of this tool is because of the challenging identification of a firearm due to the multiple sources of randomness present
Driven by the belief that space was bequeathed to them, the Native Americans feel justified in defending their land against the growing encroachment of the white man as the American landscape unfolds. Their motive is the premise that a higher authority has granted them the right to the space, and that the Great Spirit has created the landscape exclusively for them. Fueled by the formation of conflict over land, the Great Ottawa Chief, Pontiac, in his speech at Detroit, seeks to persuade the tribes, including the Ottawa, Huron, and Pottawatomi to agree to resistance. Invoking the words of the Delaware prophet, Neolin, Pontiac recounts the vision which he believes justifies resistance. Neolin urges the tribes to sever all relations to the customs
Recently gaining popularity in light of the recent election, some Californian residents are calling for secession. The idea of secession is not new, especially in instances of political turmoil. In 2012, after former President Obama’s re-election, individuals from states like Texas and Louisiana began petitions that garnered enough signatures for an office of the White House to respond. However, instead of California seceding and becoming it’s own nation, what about splitting the state into two or three states? Dividing into separate states could ease feelings of unjust representation and help the further development in each state’s needs.
Texas is a complicated state with profound roots implanted in restricted government power. It is a very conservative state that holds to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion. Governor, Rick Perry, within seconds of his speech he states, " millions of Texans…, are tired of Washington D.C,. trying to tell us how to run Texas". Just about every Texan, supports the restricted government in the middle of residents and state.
In the preceding argument we find that the president of Grove College argues that adopting coeducation to the all-female college will increase the number of applications and enrollments to the college. However, the director opposes this view by saying that being an all-female education upholds the identity of the college. While both arguments may seem valid at first glance, upon scrutiny we can find that they are poorly reasoned and based on several questionable assumptions. Hence, We need more information regarding the college to support both claims. To begin with, the president assumes that increase in the number of application and enrollments in other colleges after adopting coeducation will likely be the case in Grove College.
In life some feel the need to prove something to others. That they are better, stronger, or even more intelligent. Whatever the case may be people will go through extreme measures to prove themselves. But who do we really need to prove anything to? Is it our parents?
In the second paragraph, Herbert demands the Grove Press Executive Vice President, Seaver, to stop the use of “Coca-Cola’s” slogan , Ira C. Herbert uses an arrogant tone. By stating that the Coca-Cola corporation has been using the slogan “It’s the Real Thing” for a far longer time than the publication of the book. Herbert demanded that Grove Press stop the use of the “Theme or slogan in connection to the book.” (Herbert Line 7). The Grove Press in no way uses the slogan for advertising purposes, but rather to symbolize this book as one that will be read for lifetime of generations to come.
With the year-round pressure pertaining to college applications on high school seniors follows the impending decision of choosing an appropriate college major. Generally, the decision-making process involves prioritizing one field of interest over another, however, due to globalization and constant innovation in technology determining a college major has increasingly become the modern day equivalent of the metaphorical line between life and death. Even so, the obvious choice would be the prestigious STEM fields over liberal arts due to the instant job opportunities which are seemingly ludicrous to a recent graduate. Nevertheless, liberal arts education should be encouraged to be pursued at higher education institutions in USA because it helps
To fight any side of an argument or to recognized an argument's existence is to allow credence to said argument. In reading any of this document, including this right now, is to fuel one side or all sides of the argument. As arguments are merely a form of conveying a message to a group/person who may not agree or see something in a different way. There is of course a negative connotation tied to the word, so for the sake of the argument, please understand that an argument for this piece is merely a way of proving something, when any number of people or beings are refusing to recognize, agree, or disagree with something. There are many ways to take the above statements, however, the only worthwhile way is to agree.
More than twenty years after the end of the Cold War and yet no clear, universal answer to the question of which side did win it can be given. Was it the collapse of the Soviet Union that proved the United States triumphant or was it the total count of tactical victories in due course (for instance in the Space race) which have to be considered? And why the issue still remains so urgent on the global agenda? Actually, it is not the debatable victory of either party in question that is of utmost importance but rather what is implies for the global community. Adhering to the liberal beliefs, neither side won the Cold War, hence, neither is to claim the lead, and the ultimate say in all global issues that it implies, in a unipolar world.
As you may know, I represent Mr. Marc Donatelli in any and all actions that he may have against XXXXXX for that entity’s efforts (or lack thereof) regarding its investigation of threats and harassment directed at Mr. Donatelli by Ms. Patience Rhoades, a known prostitute, and her cohorts. For several months, Mr. Donatelli has been harassed and threatened by friends and family of Ms. Rhoades after she turned to Mr. Donatelli for help, but left inappropriately. This began in Lewisville, Texas. My client has asked me to inform you that he has sent packets of evidence to each of the agencies depicted below.
Coca-Cola is one of the biggest soft drink businesses in the world so when a Coca-Cola was asking a book company to change their slogan because they were the same, it made them seem a bit unprofessional. Ira C Herbert a representative of Coca-Cola, wrote to Richard Seaver the Executive Vice President of Grove Press Inc. to modify their slogan to something different he uses rhetorical devices such as pathos, logos, and diction. Mr. Ira C. Herbert starts off his letter getting straight to the point. He uses diction to make sure Mr. Seaver knows that they are confident the company will remove the slogan.