Argument-Making And Cognitive Analysis
Laziness is a trait that the human race possess by nature. That being said, people are most likely to search for the most economical ways to move about or do things (Oaklander, 2015). Similarly, when it comes to making judgments, human beings tend to look for the easiest and shortest ways possible. Such aspect of the human race is considerably heuristic, which can generally be defined as a cognitive rule of thumb that helps an individual to solve problems or make decisions in a quick and easy manner. According to Schneider, Gruman, and Coutts, it is common and automatic for people to use cognitive shortcuts when making judgments, in the processing of new information (2012). Heuristics basically allow individuals to make decisions with ease …show more content…
Argument-making is basically the effort to be logical, regardless of the outcome, and is reliant on the relevant reasons and facts, as they are seen during the process of making a decision. Heuristic thinking, on the other hand, is a way of making judgments or decisions by using mental shortcuts and relying upon situational cues (Snap Judgments, n.d.), and it is used more often than argument-making. In other words, the judgments people make in daily life are more often reactive and instinctive than they are reflective and deliberative. Take the process of writing an essay as an example. While the fingers are tapping the keys, the minds are focused on arranging the texts instead of on situating the letters on the keyboard. Such thinking is useful in particularly familiar situations, as well as when immediate action is required. For example, when a person is asked to think about an animal that starts with the letter ‘E’, he or she will most likely think of an elephant first before an eagle or eel. Similarly, in a test that requires one to think of a fruit that starts will the letter ‘A’, an apple will most likely come to mind instead of an apricot. The same can be applied to the color of the apple, whereby most people will think of red instead of green. This is perhaps
Hrm/531 Week 2 Assignment
350 Words | 2 PagesOften many choices can be communicated and order to make a decision and avoid judgment (Weber & Johnson,
PSA Argumentative Analysis
391 Words | 2 PagesThe authors of this journal discuss the healthcare systems cutbacks and its impact on the population. Every few years the Ontario government and the Ontario Medical Association (OMA) negotiate their contract called The Physician Services Agreement (PSA) The contract details how much physicians can bill for their services, as well as where health care funding should be invested in or where a cut back could be. In March of 2014, the contract had expired, which has led to negotiations for over the year. Over that year negotiations for the new PSA contract had many conflicts mostly due to the government’s goal try to end the province's deficit by 2017-2018.
Microstamping Argumentative Analysis
451 Words | 2 Pages“Ballistic imaging and microstamping technologies have the potential to reduce gun violence by improving the solve rate of gun-related crimes”(Giffords Law Center). Requiring microstamping and ballistic identification for any and all firearms can help detain and detect the person responsible for any local shootings. Microstamping is a needed adjustment for all firearms. This micro adjustment will enable us to find more evidence that police cannot in crime scenes and help find and track exactly which gun fired the bullet. In a blog posted by Towne Currier he explains the reason for this certain development: “The development of this tool is because of the challenging identification of a firearm due to the multiple sources of randomness present
The Great Spirit Argumentative Analysis
277 Words | 2 PagesDriven by the belief that space was bequeathed to them, the Native Americans feel justified in defending their land against the growing encroachment of the white man as the American landscape unfolds. Their motive is the premise that a higher authority has granted them the right to the space, and that the Great Spirit has created the landscape exclusively for them. Fueled by the formation of conflict over land, the Great Ottawa Chief, Pontiac, in his speech at Detroit, seeks to persuade the tribes, including the Ottawa, Huron, and Pottawatomi to agree to resistance. Invoking the words of the Delaware prophet, Neolin, Pontiac recounts the vision which he believes justifies resistance. Neolin urges the tribes to sever all relations to the customs
Initiative 42 Argumentative Analysis
796 Words | 4 PagesIt is sad so much confusion surrounds Initiative 42, especially when nearly 200,000 Mississippians signed petitions to have it placed on the November ballot to amend the state Constitution. If passed, Initiative 42 will hold the Mississippi legislature accountable for keeping its promise to fully fund public schools. That should be simple enough, but Governor Bryant has done everything within his power to confuse the issue. Is he that two-faced?
Into The Wild Argumentative Essay
462 Words | 2 PagesIn life some feel the need to prove something to others. That they are better, stronger, or even more intelligent. Whatever the case may be people will go through extreme measures to prove themselves. But who do we really need to prove anything to? Is it our parents?
The Outside Game Argumentative Analysis
1184 Words | 5 PagesPart III The Outside Game: Open Secrets and Vote Smart identify numerous groups that lobbied this bill in the hopes of it becoming a law. A number of these groups include the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the American Bar Association, the American Civil Liberties Union, Families Against Mandatory Minimums, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. These groups openly supported this bill, and wanted to be associated with it, so they lobbied. Types of lobbying in which the group Families Against Mandatory Minimums utilize are donating money to government officials through Political Action Committees in hopes of persuading them, holding local or federal protests with signs such as “Let The Punishment
Nature Vs. Nurture Argument, Questions And Answers
245 Words | 1 PagesAs our book states, in the 1970s, the children that resided in orphanages had to live in extremely depraved conditions due to lack of funding. They had no interaction with adults, other children, or even the outside world. They almost never left their cots which they slept on. These cots were also surrounded by sheets so they never were able to see other humans or the outside. The children in these orphanages that were never adopted never recovered from the years of deprivation and therefore, developed permanent cognitive defects (Cacioppo & Freberg, 2013).
The Mutuality Of A Game Show And General Psychology
1150 Words | 5 PagesIn particular, the heuristic of anchoring and adjustment is associated with the statement, “The number eleven, it’s always been a curse” (Deal or No Deal). Closely observing the commentary of the family members, they create the impression that a single tragic course of events reflects some kind of connection to the number eleven. This can be labeled as a form of anchoring and adjustment since the contestant is eventually persuaded to base his judgment off of a sliver of information. An example of the recognition heuristic is demonstrated by a family member that mentions, “You’ve always said I'd tell you honestly”
Kahneman's Theory Of Rational Decision Making
1210 Words | 5 PagesAn availability heuristic is a mental shortcut that is the immediate things that come to a given person 's mind when evaluating a specific topic, concept, method or decision. There are situations in which people assess the frequency of class or the probability of an event by the ease with which instances or occurrences could be brought to mind. For example, one may evaluate the probability that a given business venture will fail by imagining various difficulties which it could encounter. This judgmental heuristic is called availability. In general, availability is a useful clue for assessing frequency or probability, because instances of large classes are recalled better and faster than instances of less frequent classes.
Critical Thinking Chapter 3 Summary
696 Words | 3 PagesChapter 3 of Bazerman’s text focuses on common biases and where they derive from. In past chapters the topic of heuristics was covered. Basically, heuristics are rules of thumb that people use to make quick and efficient decisions. “By providing managers with efficient ways to deal with complex problems, heuristics frequently produce effective decisions.
Persuasive Argument Analysis
320 Words | 2 PagesThe most persuasive argument for the petitioner is that UT’s rationale for the use of race lacks the requisite clarity to survive the application of strict scrutiny. Since the case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka in 1954, the Equal Protection Clause demands that racial classifications are to be subjected to the most rigid scrutiny. Therefore, when government decisions take into account race it must serve a compelling government interest. The petitioner’s least convincing argument is that UT’s consideration of face is too modest to be constitutional. Race is supposed to have a modest impact and holistic and individualized which was approved in the Grutter and Bakke cases.
Argument Analysis: Bringing The Outdoors In
742 Words | 3 PagesBringing the Outdoors In After working outdoors for over 20 years, my biggest complaint in nursing is being cooped up for 8-18 hours a day. It drives me crazy! My best guess is that my patients do not care for it either. I chose to research the effects of fresh air and sunshine on patient well-being. My PICOT question is: • How would the addition of fresh air and sunshine (I) improve patient health (O) or experience in a 120 bed, long term care facility (P), over a years’ time (T), compared to a facility with no access (C) to fresh air and sunshine?
Anthropological Argument Analysis
415 Words | 2 PagesIn my paper I have attempted to show how in the history of political philosophy certain anthropological standpoints influence the explicitly political conceptions of several authors. I focused on the works of Aristotle, Machiavelli, Kant, Hegel, Marx and Engels, Schmitt, Arendt and Rawls and distinguished between four different positions. These positions differ precisely according to the anthropological points that the authors make. In this essay I have demonstrated how and to what extent different anthropological stands can impact the political thinking.
Mobility Heuristic In Nigeria
1312 Words | 6 PagesAvailability Heuristic refers to how quickly we make judgements. For instance going to a country and making quick judgements based on the food, culture or people. Through availability heuristic we can infer information in the social world. For example, Jenna is a Canadian tourist who has been in Nigeria for 4 days and has been hearing that the ebola disease is spreading in her area. Based on the recent epidemic, she quickly decides not to leave her hotel for 3 weeks and warns all other tourists to do the same.
More about Argument-Making And Cognitive Analysis
Hrm/531 Week 2 Assignment
350 Words | 2 PagesPSA Argumentative Analysis
391 Words | 2 PagesMicrostamping Argumentative Analysis
451 Words | 2 PagesThe Great Spirit Argumentative Analysis
277 Words | 2 PagesInitiative 42 Argumentative Analysis
796 Words | 4 PagesInto The Wild Argumentative Essay
462 Words | 2 PagesThe Outside Game Argumentative Analysis
1184 Words | 5 PagesNature Vs. Nurture Argument, Questions And Answers
245 Words | 1 PagesThe Mutuality Of A Game Show And General Psychology
1150 Words | 5 PagesKahneman's Theory Of Rational Decision Making
1210 Words | 5 PagesCritical Thinking Chapter 3 Summary
696 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Argument Analysis
320 Words | 2 PagesArgument Analysis: Bringing The Outdoors In
742 Words | 3 PagesAnthropological Argument Analysis
415 Words | 2 PagesMobility Heuristic In Nigeria
1312 Words | 6 Pages