Argument Of Rene Descartes Skepticism

1014 Words5 Pages
Descartes argues for skepticism in his Meditations, but I don’t think it is successful because it seems rational to conclude that although Descartes’ arguments are strong and logical, they aren’t sturdy enough to produce the necessary level of doubt. I believe that individuals can believe in their senses if we practice caution, that individuals can distinguish between a dream and reality, and that Descartes’ skepticism undermines itself.
The First Meditation begins with the meditator, Rene Descartes, considering the amount of untrue beliefs throughout his life and the incorrect body of knowledge that followed. As a result, he is determined to remove all that he thinks he knows and is resolved to rebuild his body of knowledge on a more certain foundation. He proceeds by sitting alone near a fire so that he could carefully inspect his previous opinions. Descartes assumes that he only needs to find some reason to doubt his current beliefs, thus engendering him to replace the body of knowledge on which his beliefs

were built. Instead of doubting each of his beliefs individually, Descartes reasons that he can question all his beliefs, if he is able to doubt the foundations upon which his opinions are founded. The majority of beliefs that Descartes has accepted as most true were acquired through his senses. Rene Descartes recognizes that the senses can occasionally deceive, but strictly when it pertains to material objects that are extremely small or extremely far
Open Document