The act of ratifying and repealing the 18th amendment was a compromise the American government made to keep peace in the country. The 18th Amendment, an amendment that was passed to limit the use of alcohol. This amendment was ratified on January 16, 1919. Section I of the 18th Amendment of the United States Constitution says, “After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited” (United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992)).
The United States both as a capitalist country and as a nation of individuals would benefit from the safe, regulated manufacturing and distributing of the drug. The millions of Americans who have admitted to using marijuana prove that prohibition is not the answer to the country’s drug problem. Legalization would not only promote safety, but also support the country
For instance, the Justice Department may direct that prosecutors should always aim to obtain at least the minimum prison sentence, when pursuing drug related cases. The Obama administration abstained from using this prerogative, as it causes a strain on the budget in the long run. Trump also took part in paying lip service on the drug problem, which is a serious public health issue. He stressed that he would expand treatment options in the future, although this statement goes against his repulsion of the Affordable Care Act.
Politically, in many ways, they are correct. John P Walter, the former director of The White House Office of National Drug control policy, points out that failure to fight against drug legalization in the country works against International anti-drug efforts. This could then weaken ties with Nations that have been strong trade partners and political allies, thus weakening our country's position in the world. In opposition to this point, some argue that the weakened trade alliances could benefit our country by encouraging businesses to remain in the United States rather than outsourcing their businesses
The first con of net neutrality is that it will prevent competition in the free market. If the internet is regulated by the government that will stifle the free market because if every company if forced to compete on a level playing then the best business won’t be able to rise to the cream of the crop through natural competition. If one ISP raises their prices then that person can just switch over to the company with cheaper rates. A free market is healthy not only for businesses but for the overall economy as well because it will force other companies to have step their game up in order
In American society, the use of marijuana, whether it’s medical or recreational, is a highly discussed topic. There are arguments for and against both recreational and medical marijuana. Between the arguments of safety and practicality, the truth about this drug has gotten mixed around and changed. Although it is believed that marijuana would only negatively affect our society, the use should be federally legalized, at least medically, in all 50 states because it has a very low risk when it comes to an individuals health, would improve the economy, and aid medical advances.
According to a research, the pleasure of rape doesn’t come from sex at all, instead, it comes from violence (Wei, 2002). To sum up, there are both pros and cons in the legalization of prostitution. It will make the industry easier to be supervised and protect sex workers’ rights, yet it will also lead to the early access to sexual behavior of juveniles. Arguments against these main points are: government’s supervision will not be effective, cause the collapse of social values and reduce the juveniles’ rape rate.
On the other hand, low voter turnout could mean that there is something in the government that needs to be improved. Lipjphards antidote of having a strong democracy is to maximize turnout and it could only be done effectively through compulsory voting. In his literature, he mentions that low over turnout could be a serious problem for the following reasons: (1) democratic legitimacy is questioned and (2) low voter turnout could mean that certain groups vote in greater numbers than other groups. If legitimacy is lost, it could lead to chaotic conditions because when people start to doubt the government, uprising and rebellion could be the very results to this. If certain groups vote in greater numbers than other groups, there could be a gap as to the privileged-citizens and the unrepresented most especially in influencing law makers making governmental policies.
Some people argue that it can be good to use it for medical purposes only while others say it should be legal for recreational purposes as well. My personal opinion, all states should legalize the recreational use of marijuana just as alcohol is sold legally. As far as the crime I think crime rates will decrease, there won’t be a need to hide and sell weed because it’s legal. The reason for drug related crime is it comes with a punishment possible jail time. Selling drugs comes with a risk, a risk that street drug dealers were willing to take for tax-free
Some readers may feel that this editorial actually is not persuasive because meth is a terrible drug that should be kept illegal and more people would try meth if it becomes legal. But in reality, legalizing meth reveals that the editorial is effective because if we kept the drug illegal that still would not stop a person from desiring and acquiring meth and more people would not try meth because if a person wanted to try meth they would have done it before it became
Opposed to this, “NORML has consistently supported decriminalizing adults ' responsible use of marijuana for personal, medicinal, and therapeutic reasons. NORML suggests the establishment of a legally regulated and taxed market for marijuana and seeks changes that would enable users to purchase the drug in a safe and secure environment and cultivate marijuana for personal use.” (Knox College). Influencing the movement of more marijuana in the streets causes great risks for the youth by having it so easily accessible to them. The extreme marketing tactics inflicted by the big marijuana industries will be a similar situation to what happened with the tobacco industry years ago.
This is because if we were to make it legal, it would make the economy better. It would also bring down crime and get many people out of prison. Honestly, marijuana prohibition really parallels to the alcohol prohibition in the 1920s. Because of this, the outcome of marijuana legalization would probably be very different than the outcome of alcohol
“If you have enough money to buy drugs, then you don’t need the public assistance,” Colorado state Rep. Jerry Sonnenberg told the Associated Press(2016). If legislators can come up with a drug-testing regimen that passes legal muster -- which has proven difficult for more than one state -- they may see a net savings. Sponsors of these bills insist that while cost savings are nice, these measures are really about changing behaviors (Greenblatt, 2012). “Benefit payments that have been wasted on drug abusers will be available for the truly needy,” says Oklahoma state Rep. Guy Liebmann (2016), “and addicts will be incentivized to get treatment.” If a recipient is abusing drugs their chances of finding a job are slim with how many employers drug