Books should not be banned because it deprives mature readers of information they might need to know about. Arizona State University says that we need to
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
but I start working very energetically. But later on I collect more data and become unable to organize thoroughly. Additionally, I spend more time on data collection inadvertently and at the end I have to plagiarize.” Many students avoid working hard because of laziness. They remain lethargic while working on assignments and thesis.
You may not see is since it has become a daily thing for you since you have been a child and since your child has started school. You may think they are fine but they are actually struggling just to stay on top of everything. Stop them every occasionally and ask them if they need help with anything. Whether it be something with their homework or something
Now as a teacher himself he finds his students struggling to put words on paper and express themselves. He blames the educational system for his students inability to write with their own style and voice. Ballenger stresses the ability to write is more about the topic and the student’s interest in the essay than the grammar and structure of the essays. He finds that other professors view their students essays as badly written with sloppy writing, yet Ballenger focuses on the writing that his students do well. He points out that
They can also try to paraphrase words other than write it as it is and cite what was paraphrased. Another way is for people to remember what is theirs and what is not. When someone is paraphrasing a text, then they are taking another's words and putting it into their own, and at the end if they add the last name of the person in parentheses, then it is not considered plagiarism, and so that way one can still get ideas off of another, and not have to deal with any consequences, “the best way to avoid stealing text is to create your own by paraphrasing” (Parks). There is a much better chance of safety when one plagiarizes rather than copying all without citing,“I cannot overstate the importance of paraphrasing,” (Acacia park). Paraphrasing keeps one out of the Troubles of
America’s education system has been an issue for quite awhile now, many students have complained about how they are taught on a daily basis. As a high school student who has been in three different American public schools, education is not what is going on inside. From students not even showing up to them showing up not caring can lead back to the way we are being taught. We are bored and tired of taking pointless tests with pointless information. All students dread the days when final exams arrive.
With these points free speech is important to keep to protect the minority from the majority. E: This is because without free speech ideas that go against the status quo could be seen as unreasonable. E: This was shown in the 1960s with civil rights ending segregation, and without free speech, these ideas would have been seen as a disgrace and quickly shunned (Stanley).A: This shows how in the past free speech helped people with major civil rights cases. E: The other point is that by censoring free speech, it won 't stop hate speech at all and people will find other ways to spread the speech. E: This is because “Banning bigoted speech won’t end bigotry, even if it might chill some of the crudest expressions.
In that case, this really would be no different from hating specific race groups or other religions. Running a business, in this day and age, should not allow someone to turn customers away based solely on who they are or who they love. While some have compared it to the rule of “No shoes, No shirt, No service”, that would be likening someone’s identity down to something material and exchangeable. It is impossible for someone to change races or sexualities at the drop of a hat, but it’s much easier to get clothed and get served. Therefore, faulty comparisons that dehumanize the circumstances should be avoided at all cost because all they serve to do is offend and play down the importance of the
Denial Denial includes hindering outside actions from mindfulness. If some condition is too great to grip, the individual simply refuses to be involved. This is an original and unsafe defense, no one ignores the truth and escapes from it for long. It can function by itself or, more normally, in arrangement with additional, more delicate maneuvers that support it. For instance, tobacco users might reject to confess to themselves that tobacco is corrupt for their well-being.