We would continually see more large wars occurring because society would decide that the mistakes made in the past aren’t worth remembering. In the society that is proposed these are the dilemmas we would face. In that society we would not learn from the mistakes of the past. The Geneva Accords would not have been set as we would have
It does not make sense to create a hundred other problems just to solve one problem. World War I was supposed to lead to peace, but it just led to another war. This shows how war is never the solution. Something bad will always lead to something
The world has been prospering from war for a long time. But, we do not always see the problems it causes. For instance, it tears families apart, it clashes generations, and finally it shows us principal versus reality. So, if war brings more bad things than good it defeats the purpose of even having a war in the first place. The authors of My Brother Sam is Dead also feels that war is pointless and unnecessary.
Even though, we had such a crazy election this year, he would probably hold no premise in today’s society simply because the government has changed so much, and his rules and much other stuff that he would probably like to see would be completely different. As far what would be deemed unacceptable, I don’t really know what would be considered acceptable and unacceptable from that time periods standpoint, the way taxes worked would probably be unacceptable, but that’s about it. Though, I believe I would save the documents he’s ever penned and the records of his achievements because this would be about the pinnacle of the United States considering they are just starting to become a nation. What he was able to do was amazing and back then I don’t think anybody else could have done it during the time. He was an exemplary commander and even better general.
How he would do anything to keep the people safe, and take care of them. Show the people what a good leader looks like. Have you ever heard or seen Julius Caesar say something so strong and caring like that? No, because he’s dangerous. He can’t even do anything himself, if he becomes crowned, he’s going to be a useless leader for the Roman people.
The sovereign keeps the people safe but, removes almost unlimited power in exchange. Anything that weakest monarchy will lead to anarchy to the S.O.N and to war. The sovereign cannot take the lives of citizens without good reason. We need to leave the state of nature because it's dangerous and our one right is in the grave
With the lesson in mind you will be less likely to repeat the same mistake in theory again after paying a fine. But how many still obey the speed limit despite some previously been caught and pay a fine? Human’s rationalization says that it won’t happen again. The same idea with a view to war, like other countless lessons, human nature fails to correct these mistakes from happening time and time again. This lesson transcends time, it is an established notion in every country and in every human, throughout the world.
While the international consensus is currently towards globalization of the economy, the political consensus is still mainly national. This discrepancy in has created “winners”, including those in the upper middle class of developing countries and the top one percent of the wealthiest people, and “losers”, the global working class and lower middle class. The losers in particular are not satisfied with how their position has diminished relative to before, which has led to reactionary movements throughout the world ("The Winners and Losers of Globalization"). For example, in France, Marine Le Pen of the Front National (FN), a party that calls itself the sole savior for the “French victims of globalization” (Angel), leads most polls for the upcoming 2017 French presidential election (Goulard). In the United States, Republican nominee Donald Trump makes calls for “economic independence” (“Policies – Donald J. Trump”) in response to North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
He gave great advice and he is the first president and the most experienced than the other 44 presidents. He knew the situations that presidents had to face and no one believed he was right and now they got themselves into a mess that would be even worse if they tried to get out of it. If we listened to Washington and did not create these permanent alliances we would not have to worry about what Trump would do. Trump would not have to do anything if we listened to what Washington said from the beginning. This is a way teaches every a lesson, to listen to the people that have experience and not try to do what you think you know best, most of the time you are not going to be
Two of the candidates I questioned believe that yes, the United States of America has swung too far away from its heritage of liberty in its quest to up the security of our country. They believe this because with all the dangerous things happening in the world like terrorists attacks, school shootings, child abductions, hate crimes, etc. have caused this nation to focus on protecting the states and have lost its sight on our heritage of liberty. The last candidate I spoke with disagreed and said she didn’t believe our nation was swinging too far away from its heritage of liberty over our nations’
Voting does not really represent the country, but rather, represents the rich and powerful of the country. The quote, "Candidates cannot run for office in America unless they have millions upon millions of dollars," is true when looking at the
It didn’t to the government, and it wouldn’t to the people either. If people had seen this, they would have lost hope, lost trust in the government. Fear would rise- rebellions would strike, and protests will commence. This was the last thing they needed, and it is the pictures, the first-hand accounts of this that made people ponder upon this question- Was this a triumph or a disaster? And for who?
War has unpredictable outcomes, that could either ruin a nation, or just end further conflict. The risk, along with the cons of declaring war, could tear the nation that was built, apart. Declaring war on Britain will not fix one of the underlying problems, trade. The nation is better off letting peaceable coercion take its course. If they declare war, all trade connections would be severed.
This policy is to blame when it comes to most of the problems of the Middle East today. And tragically the Iran Hostage Crisis is what ended it for President Carter his lack of leadership and knowledge during this time ended up costing the United States valuable members of its international team, and Jimmy Carters re-election. As Americans look back today our nation stands better off, but most people do look at these situations and ask what if some of this stuff would have been done differently. That is a question we will never have an answer too, but for right now we just have to keep moving
if we want to continue growing then we need the help of Britain. Leaving them will slow us down drastically. And even if we win the war it will be hard to get back on our feet. So make the logical decision colonists and stay with Great Britain so we can prevent the consequences that will come and the losses we will