Gun Although advocates argue that gun control laws reduce the incidence of violent crimes by taking away firearms; Gun laws barely effect violence rates, criminals would often go against the law, and there are several loopholes to defy gun laws. Gun Control does not majorly effect the rates of violence in the way it is expected to. But really, when using regression analysis, state data, and a variety of many social and economic methods [Doctor] Murray
In the start of the article he tries and imply that if marijuana is legalized that it will end in the same outcome that cigarettes did. Marijuana cannot only be used for recreational use but also can be prescribed as a form of prescription medicine to treat several illnesses, pains, and diseases, which was not addressed to the audience. If he did then readers would have a little background knowledge on this drug. Furthermore would a man with a PhD or such a high degree prescribe something that can possibly hurt his or her patients? These doctors and physicians are the ones who see marijuana as a medicine not as a dangerous drug.
The beverage industry sued San Francisco for trying to put health warnings on ads for unhealthy drinks. The industry claimed that San Francisco was restricting their First Amendment rights. The court ruled, rightly so, that San Francisco had a right to enforce the law. This is a major improvement and will hopefully contribute to decreasing obesity in America. This case proves that the beverage industry is trying to hide the connection between sugar-sweetened drinks and health issues.
This is and was the main problem with Federalism, as the state government could for instance set a tax, which is not forbidden by the Constitution, but comes into conflict with Congress’s authority to tax. What transpires is a system of essentially an overlapping authority in which the national government has a certain amount of authority over the nation as a whole, while the state governments have powers not limited to national government, but the Constitution. “The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government with power over issues of national concern, while the state governments, generally, have jurisdiction over issues of domestic concern” (Cornell, n.d, para.
He didn't think drugs were as dangerous as Anslinger was saying, if used appropriately of course. So they were advocating for the proper use of drugs. They didn't think regulations as powerful as Anslinger’s were needed. They were scholars who knew he wasn’t providing the entire information to the public about the dangers of drugs. Anslinger even said that marijuana was dangerous because it made a teenager kill his entire family; hindering that fact that he had psychiatric health issues as well as having used marijuana.
The War on Drugs has been criticized for its inability to decrease drug users and drug related crimes. The US government’s methods combat illicit drug crimes have made people question the main motives of War on Drugs. Since the US government declared the War on Drugs asset forfeiture has been widely used by law enforcement agencies to reduce drug criminals influence. Asset forfeiture is effective in tackling illegal drug crimes and funding government agencies, but the laws about asset forfeiture has been controversial due to its questionable profit incentives for law enforcement and inability to protect property owners from unfair seizures. Asset forfeiture is the legal process in which property is seized based on its association with illegal
For instance, the Justice Department may direct that prosecutors should always aim to obtain at least the minimum prison sentence, when pursuing drug related cases. The Obama administration abstained from using this prerogative, as it causes a strain on the budget in the long run. Trump also took part in paying lip service on the drug problem, which is a serious public health issue. He stressed that he would expand treatment options in the future, although this statement goes against his repulsion of the Affordable Care Act. The repealing of ObamaCare clearly has the potential to adversely affect a quarter million people, who are currently receiving treatment for opioid based addictions.
Gun control brings about many issues of citizen rights and legalities. There are many benefits and disadvantages of gun control. Some proponents of gun control would argue things such as; the constitution says only militias should be allowed arms, and that it doesn 't allow unlimited ownership. Also, they might say the constitution is dated and did not intend to allow “assault” rifles. Some other arguments may include things such as: reduced violence with less weapons, guns
You are asking, do I have a wrongful end case on the grounds that I was let go for restorative cannabis? Well the courts in California have not yet found in the employee=s support yet as to being let go for therapeutic cannabis. On the other hand, that doesn=t mean you don=t have a case. The answer would turn on whether you are truly utilizing the therapeutic cannabis to treat an inability or in the event that it is simply recreational utilization. Here in California, dispensary clients have the capacity to get a supposed specialist to endorse restorative weed.
Education about overdose or providing referrals to medical and social services such as health screenings are offered. Also, incorporating harm reduction strategies into public health interventions for people who inject drugs may be helpful in resolving other health care (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016). One argument against Needle Exchange programs is that by providing needles and syringes to addicts, the government is essentially condoning illicit and immoral behavior (“Debate: Needle exchanges”). Drug users are continuously given free access of clean utensil to shoot up. Instead of providing them access, the government should focus on punishing drug users, discourage drug-use, and provide more treatment for quitting