Do you have a gun in your household? Should people carry guns with them? Michael Steele once said,”You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you don 't enforce them, people are going to find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It 's not the law-abiding citizens, it 's not the person who uses it as a hobby.“Gun control is an important thing to know about and why it either helps people or doesn’t help them.
Secondly, a gun is useless unless one knows how to use it. If you put a gun on the table and tell it to shoot, it is obviously not going to go off. Therefore, proper gun instruction is vital to operating a gun. Before handling a gun, “learn how it operates. Know the basic parts, how to safely open and close the action and remove any ammunition from the gun or magazine” (NRA Gun Safety Rules 5).
The National Rifle Association strives to protect the rights of gun owners and make the use of guns safer. Regardless, many believe guns are too dangerous and should be outlawed. That would only allow for criminals to have guns and leave law-abiding citizens with no means of
In this case, the AR 15 seems to go against the ultimate goal of protecting people. Therefore, Aristotle would ask who should have sole responsibility of the purchased AR 15 gun? Should the person who purchased the gun also be punished for not keeping a close eye on their gun? In weighing these three aspects, I believe that Aristotle would not have been able to make a decision of whether AR 15’s should be banned. Instead, I think he would have tried to figure out what the “mean between extremes.” The AR 15 should be able to shoot far enough where the civilians can protect themselves from a distance, but not so far that the gun can be used to hurt someone on purpose.
More specifically, I believe that gun violence will always be an issue whether they are banned or not. If someone plans on hurting someone, they will not care about rules. For example, Guns are very easy for people to buy, but how is the seller going to know what they plan to do with it. It is not like they are going to say that they are going to kill someone with it. Therefore, I conclude that banning guns is not worth it because people who want to use them for negative reasons will even if they are banned.
The same is true for combination locks, especially for those who tend to forget their combinations. The need for gun owners to keep their guns put away arose largely from gun control laws, but also from common sense as parents want to protect their curious kids from hurting themselves or others. For the ease of access in the case of some emergency situation, a biometric gun safe is probably the best bet. Imagine the situation in the worst-case scenario, and under pressure if you had your choice to use your fingerprint safe versus fumbling for the key or recalling the right combination...you can surely see the clear advantage of a biometric design. Biometric pistol safes are also great if you have small valuables to store, as many of these safes come with enough storage for your guns and then
2. I don 't think that teachers should be armed either. I feel like someone that has a gun should go through an extensive training (that doesn 't just last a couple of days or a background check) and should prove they are capable of handing a gun only when necessary. I lived in one of the most dangerous countries in the world, and I saw how license guns only increased the violence. People used guns to protect their loved ones yet that one person who was harmed also had people that cared about them who wanted revenge.
Also you can carry around a pistol with a concealed weapon license. When you own a gun you can use it for self-defense or if you have a rifle you can hunt with it. Some people want to make it so we don’t have gun rights. But what if someone comes into you house with a weapon and you can’t defend yourself. Then we will have more deaths if no one has a gun.
I believe that due to recent shootings, we as America should do something to put an end to these shootings. I know that the difference between gun advocates versus gun control activists is that gun advocates have guns and know how to use them properly. Donald Trump has stated that to put an end to the shootings is not only due from obtaining a gun, but mental health. I also believe that it isn’t necessary to own a gun unless you’re using. I am torn between both sides, because half of the people feel more safe when they have a gun on hand, and the others feel more safe knowing that no one is in possession of a weapon.
To demonstrate whether a person should own a firearm or not, Joe Messerli wrote an article to compare the pros and cons of owning a firearm. In favor of gun control he first, stated that the right to own a gun should be restricted because it would reduce crime. Second, those mental disabled persons, kids who are bullied and aggravated workers could cause a dangerous incident that would not have occurred if gun ownership was restricted. Third, a person who has a gun would be in more danger than a person without one against a criminal. Fourth, suicide and crimes of love or jealousy are more likely to occur easier with a firearm available.
Everyone Is Telling Preppers What Firearms They Should Own First, being told what to do, or having suggestions thrown at you is part of learning and gaining knowledge. Seeking advice is what you do, because if you don 't know, this means someone has to tell you. However, once you have training and skills you can then decide what is best for your situation. What Do Need and What Do You Want Some people may decide they do not need any firearms at all, and this is perfectly fine, your choice. Others make it a priority, and a small majority probably carry it a bit too far.
I wish I could have a gun of my own to carry with me when and wherever I please. I’m against gun control I wish people with guns weren 't limited to their selection but also believe not everyone should be able to get a gun license and own and carry a gun. I wish the Government were stricter on getting guns. Not everyone should be able to carry a gun. But the americans who would pass the test earn their right to bear arms.
Most gun owners have guns as protection for themselves and for their families. One of the most prominent arguments for to pro gun ownership side is that guns are protection from a seemingly increasingly violent world. Also “...having guns gives [people] and least a fighting chance in the event of a burglar or home invader manages to get in.”(safewise.com). The second amendment gives people the right to own and use guns and is “...an undeniable personal freedom guaranteed by the constitution.”(openreader.org). People also “...support the rights of hunters, sport shooters, and recreational gunmen.” (openreader.org).Criminals are already breaking the law, so adding more won 't deter them.
Also, how are civilians able to tell how that person is going to use that gun? For self defense or to harm other people, no one can be sure what someone would do with a gun out in the open. Finally, this scenario is very unlikely to happen, so why someone would carry a loaded AK-47 into a Taco Bell just in case a bad guy shows up is beyond my
People take the right to own a gun for granted. Not everybody uses guns to protect themselves, and the people who do sometimes aren 't trained and pull the trigger at the first site of danger. Guns are dangerous and we need to find a way to protect the 2nd amendment, while also making