The nature of the current debate surrounding the implementation of universal healthcare in America is troubling because it is comprised almost entirely of pragmatic arguments void of concern for the principles behind the project. Before one asks how much a thing will cost, how it will be organized, or whether “the uninsured” will benefit, one should ask whether enacting universal healthcare is in keeping with the values and principles of the American experiment. In other words, is universal healthcare good for America? Universal healthcare is not good for America. In America, universal healthcare would undermine principles important to the functioning of society; specifically, it would undermine individual liberty, free enterprise and free …show more content…
Though intended to provide medical coverage to its citizens and therefore protect their lives, universal healthcare would make the government an active agent in deciding when to end patients’ lives. End of life issues are an inextricable part of medical practice, whether they are related to elderly care, life-altering diseases, or controversial issues such as abortion or euthanasia. Instead of making a principled defense of its citizens’ right to life, universal healthcare would force the government to make pragmatic, cost based decisions regarding the perseveration of life. One can already see evidence for this in current debates about the cost of medical care for the elderly and serious discussions in the halls of congress about the economic value of euthanasia and abortion. Such debates ought to act as a warning for all regarding the means by which life will be measured and valued in a system of universal healthcare. Instead of defending one’s right to live, government would decide if one ought to live. And even if universal healthcare permits one to live, that one would find himself living in a less free and entrepreneurial society; a society that is supposedly good for everyone
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
In the Declaration of Independence, it lists the right that Americans and health care did not include but it should be. When in grade school, you learn about the three things that are essential living: food, water, and shelter. And none of these essentials fix in the category of being a right. Americans should not be afraid that if they lose their jobs or get another job then they will lose their health insurances. The poorest people are unable to pay payment that comes from hospital services, or even just a basic check-up.
One of the most significant current discussion about health care is the introduction of Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare) in America. The aims are to improve the quality of health care services and expand the public insurance companies, Medicare and Medicaid, so that to reduce the numbers of uninsured. As the government has increased taxes; and fines will be collected if citizens and businesses aren 't purchasing or providing any health insurance, the period of introduction and implementation, the America’s economy has resulted a big change in different aspects, such as the rate of economic growth, unemployment, government expenditure and the society influences, so it brings out the argument on “should the government repeal the act?”. Although
Avoiding single-payer healthcare also helps avoid limit government bureaucracy because it keeps the government from making as many decisions about healthcare and leaving those
Many Americans don’t want a free healthcare system to happen since they will be forced to pay more taxes. However, paying more taxes will ensure you and your family's safety and health in the long run. The first reason that healthcare should be free to everyone is that the unemployed people will benefit heavily. “Because of financial restraints, unemployed people suffer the most. They do not have any health insurance.”
The purpose of this paper is to holistically analyze ObamaCare, also known as the Patient Protection and Affordable HealthCare Act, taking into account both the benefits and shortcomings of this health care plan introduced by the Obama Administration. The Affordable HealthCare Act is not necessarily a newly introduced law, but a law that reforms existing healthcare programs in the United States. The law does introduce new benefits, however, it is largely comprised of new provisions including the mandate for all Americans to have health insurance, the expansion of existing social healthcare programs, and the mandate for large employers to provide coverage to all eligible employees. The goal of the Patient Protection and Affordable HealthCare
The United States should not reform healthcare because it creates healthcare accessibility for lower class and elderly citizens, influences other countries on the way they form healthcare systems, and does not cause communistic beliefs within American government. To better understand why
Argumentative Speech Essay What is the first thing that comes to your mind when hearing the phrase, “Universal Healthcare”, and why do you feel that way? Your views can fall within three groups, you can either fall into the group that is all for Universal Healthcare, The group that is COMPLETELY against Universal Healthcare, or be within the third group in which don’t know what it means, or simply, don’t care. The world first heard of Free Health Coverage for citizens in 1883 in Germany. Today, thirty-two of the thirty-three developed nations in the world offer Universal Health Care with the United States being the lone exception.
Introduction Over the years the American Health Care reform issue has created much controversy amongst the American people. Since the passage of the Medicaid and Medicare Act of 1965 which at the time provided certain people such as the elderly, disable and low income families’ health insurance coverage. During the Presidential years of Truman, Nixon and Bill Clinton they each presented a new health care proposal but never got enacted. This was due through failed initiatives since it was important to get support from interest groups and political parties.
Health care is essential for Americans despite pre-existing conditions, and a free market insurance program would allow citizens to received the health care that is so desperately needed. A universal health care system is a matter of human rights and would solve America’s problem of one sixth of the population being
Therefor you will see a reduction in health care cost, a great example of this is the United Kingdom. A country where everyone has the right to health care, managed to provide health care to all citizens while spending just 41.5% of what the United States did per
Healthcare is something everyone needs and should be able to get, but right now that is not happening. In America there are millions of people who don’t have healthcare insurance. This is because some can’t afford the insurance plan. There are also millions more who have health insurance, but can’t afford using it. This means that they are paying for an insurance plan, but the deductibles are so high they can’t afford to go to the doctor.
The United States “is among the wealthiest and most prosperous nations in the world, yet its government is unwilling, or incapable of providing adequate, basic health care to all its citizens”. The health care system in America is known for being non-affordable and non-caring for its citizens, moreover, is “antiquated, messy and inefficient”. A system in which people with money are the only ones with the privilege of being able to acquire one. Many countries like Canada, Mexico, Cuba, Malaysia, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, to mention some, are known for having simple, affordable, and a comprehensive health care system. A few of them do not work at its best, due to corruption, for personal experience, the Mexican health care system;
Healthcare in the United States is in desperate need of reform. There are several rationales to further explain this proposition. As an illustration, the Declaration of Independence states our unalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In other words, every individual should be entitled to healthcare as it preserves life and promotes the general welfare. The federal government should, therefore, enact a program of universal health to better protect and serve all of its citizens.