Argumentative Essay-Nuclear Energy Is Australia's Future

The advantages of using Nuclear power plants: • Free from CO2 : One of the major advantages of using nuclear power plants is that, it is free from carbon-di-oxide emissions. Most of the conventional methods of generating electricity include the usage of non- renewable resources like coal which generates CO2 upon usage. • Very efficient source of energy: The energy produced by the fission of an atom of uranium or plutonium or any other element used in the process of nuclear fission for generating energy, I almost 10 million times the amount of energy produced by combustion of a single atom of carbon in coal. It also doesn’t result in the depletion of fossil fuel reserves. Hence one can obviously see the efficiency and the effectiveness of using nuclear power plants for producing heat and

It can also stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations. Even though it will produce some radioactive waste, but is won’t release if the government manage them safely. According to Patrick Moore’s state, “Nuclear energy may just be the energy source that can save our planet from another possible disaster: catastrophic climate change. Nuclear energy is the only large scale, cost-effective energy source that can reduce carbon dioxide emissions while continuing to satisfy a growing demand for

Over 20 percent of the energy in the United States comes from nuclear energy power plants. (Rinkesh, 2018) They so their best to get as much energy to the country as possible, but there are those out there who don’t agree with them. While there are downsides to nuclear energy, the pros vastly outweigh the cons. Nuclear power plants are a great way to get energy because they don’t let out much pollution, are very efficient, and are very safe. There are 6 operating power plants in Illinois and 11 reactors.

Government is supporting the wind turbines as they are the cheapest energy sources, so government is putting subsidies to reduce the cost of installation. Many countries across the world providing incentives for only the installation such technologies that are cheap and environment friendly. , Low Maintenance You don’t have to worry all the time about your wind turbines. A new wind turbine can be expected to work for a long time without any maintenance work to be carried out. Although older wind turbines might need the maintenance as they do have reliability issues.

❀ Clean-burning - Unalike fossil fuels, biofuels are more environmentally friendly, producing less air pollution and also utilising materials that are considered to be waste products. Biofuels play a vital role in reducing our carbon footprint as they emit less greenhouse gases compared to other conventional fuels. These disadvantages are what is limiting biofuels from becoming the dominant energy

The mining process of tar sands is simply atrocious. The condition of the left over water from the process is ridiculous. Plus, it takes extensive amounts of energy to deal with tar sand mining. Therefore, they are going to build two nuclear power plants to provide for it. In addition, the unconventional oil extracting process creates extra greenhouse gases than using the oil itself creates.

A few of these types of energy are: Solar panels, wind turbines and nuclear energy, which all do not release toxic gases. However these energy sources also have pros and cons in multiple ways and aspects, two of them being socially and economically which makes the choice hard on which energy source to invest most in to avoid more problems in our climate. Since solar energy is easy to access and is becoming more popular, therefor in has a lot of potential to become the energy source, which will help reduce greenhouse gases. Nuclear energy: Nuclear energy is an alternative energy that can be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The energy is generated by water that is turned into steam, which drives turbine generators to produce electricity.

Imagine a world without electricity. Unfortunately, that isn’t possible since the modern world depends on it for almost every aspect of daily living. But energy is required to produce electricity. That energy source is either renewable or nonrenewable. Coal is a nonrenewable resource that is part of the fossil fuel category that includes oil and gas, and it remains a vital source of energy for both industrialized and developing nations.

During their research, Delucchi and Jacobson stated, “The private costs of generating wind power, geothermal power, and hydropower are less than the costs of conventional fossil-fuel power.” High power bills are always a concern in The Bahamas. By utilizing renewable energy sources, and installing solar panels and windmills, Bahamians will be able to provide energy without the fear of a high power bill at the end of the month. Reducing the use of carbon emissions is often perceived as costly but it has been proven to be quite profitable. Saving and reusing fuel costs less than buying the fuel. In 2009, McKinsey & Company concluded that greenhouse gas emissions could be cut by 70 percent in 16 years at an average cost of $6 per metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent.

There are many natural resources that humans have used for centuries, and some only for several decades; regardless; nature provides sources of energy and electricity that we need to function and survive. Natural sources of energy are divided into non-renewable, and renewable energy sources. We should use renewable energy sources to produce electricity, rather than non-renewable resources because we cannot run out of them, they produce little to no pollution, and they are safer to extract and use than non-renewable resources. Initially, the most obvious reason that renewable resources should be used rather than non-renewable resources is because it is impossible to run out of renewable resources. A statement from Zamba Goes Green reads, “Renewable resources do not have the same problem.

In Reagan era, gas production soar, where in Carters, gas production decline. The environmental and energy crisis of the 1970s did lead to the decline in the United States. Americans dependence on domestic and foreign oil correlated to oil being limited and not always, readily available. Although, there were many alternative solutions to petroleum, for instance nuclear plants and coals, the results were not favorable. The environmental and energy crisis of the 1970s still constrained the United States today with more smog, landfill waste, and gas prices risen and

Price for gas was skyrocketing, Nixon and his administration now face something they never saw coming. With Arab Nations putting an embargo on the U.S. for oil. This led to the worst gas shortage in U.S. history. At the start of 1968 the price for fuel began to rise at outrageous amounts with gas being priced at one hundred times its original value. With the price for oil continuously growing the price for food, fuel and transportation went up drastically.

The natural gas use has pros and cons as anything in this life. The natural gas has many advantages. It is less harmful than oil or coal. It causes less damage to the environment compared to oil and coal. It has less carbon emission because it is made of methane gas.

A third way that fracking is a useful resource is that It lowers energy cost. The United states can produce natural gas for only $2.50 per thousand cubic feet making it the world’s best and cheapest liquefying technology. Robert Hefner points out that the cost of heating 65 million American home by natural gas has fallen $20 Billion annually. Plus, The comparative decrease in natural gas cost for low-income households was more than $10 billion. Since then the United states has become the world’s low-cost producer of natural gas.