Following this major scientific and technological breakthrough, it raised the possibility that humans can be cloned using the same procedure‒ somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). At present, however, human reproductive cloning remains a highly controversial issue. This is particularly due to the associated ethical considerations which include potential genetic damage to the clone, health risks to the mother, psychological harm to the clone and complex altered familial relationships. In this essay, we attempt to argue on why human reproductive cloning should not be banned. Human reproductive cloning, if successful, will allow infertile couples to have a genetically related child.
We cannot alter nature’s way of sustaining the earth; it’s the natural order of things. Another reason why people discontinuing the study of embryonic stem cells and their possible repairing influences they have on the body would be a superb idea would be because death is certain, anything we may try to do to avoid death is pointless. There is a natural order to life and if people try to find one way to avoid death, there will be many more other ways to perish. Some will be harder to escape than
Artificial insemination is another name for intrauterine insemination but can also refer to placing sperm in a woman’s vagina or cervix when she is ovulating. The sperm then travels into the fallopian tubes, where they can fertilize the woman’s egg or eggs. C. Artificial insemination is for couples that want to have a baby but cannot produce having children. II. A.
Some economics groups insist about the cost of the process and all the money a country need to clone an animal or human. This is some of the issues I will talk about in this researched paper. As some organizations and doctor says, cloning has some advantage and disadvantage in the medicine. The doctor talked about the advantage to reproduce an internal organ from stem cell obtained from an embryo of an animal. But also, other talked about the disadvantaged to recreate a gene abnormal baby who later will be affected in different progress.
They can clone a person’s dead kids, and animals that are going extinct. Cloning is a copy of something. The way they are cloning is by taking the egg cell and remove its nucleus so that it will read and duplicate the DNA of the donor cell. No doubt, cloning would help the human race, but here is why. The point of cloning is that it can help a lot of people for medical purposes.
Though technology at some point will likely make this possible, “human cloning is scientifically distant at best” and “the scientific community has universally condemned it” (Acost and Golub 429). Without the support of the possible creators of this technology, there is no way that this would ever come about, and it remains irrelevant to the known information about the benefits stem cell research would have on the world of healing medicine. At the center of the controversy lies politics and the continuous battle between being supportive of the research and respecting the beliefs of American groups. Starting in 1995, legislation took on the topic of stem cell research by creating the Dickey-Wicker Amendment. This amendment declared that no government funding would go towards anything that results in or could cause the destruction of embryos.
Designer babies, what are they exactly? Well, designer babies are human embryos that have been genetically modified, usually following guidelines set by the parent or scientist, to produce desirable traits. This is done using various methods, such as germline engineering or Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and is usually implanted using in vitro fertilization. Essentially, a designer baby is a baby made in a lab using an egg and sperm and then genetically modified based on what the parent wants. The embryo is then implanted into the uterus to grow as a normal baby.
Therapeutic cloning uses a person’s own cells to make new bodily systems or organs.“Embryos are often used for therapeutic cloning, because they have the ability to transform and grow into any type of organ and cell,” (“Pros and cons,” 2013, para. 2). This type of cloning is potentially useful, but it has not been perfected despite years of research. It also comes with many risks, such as the possible production of tumors. Reproductive cloning is used to create an animal or human with identical genetic features as that of another animal or human.“The most common technique is somatic cell nuclear transfer” (“Reproductive Cloning,” n.d., para.
Should or should we not prohibit genetically engineered babies is the question to ask. After years and year of trying to figure out the cure for a disease like a mitochondrial disease, a group of professional on the topic believes that it would greatly benefit the baby’s outcome exceptionally if their parents has harmful genetics. Most people concern would be how the baby would turn out because there have not been any clinical trials that prove that the genetics that is engineered properly work like they should. I personally believe that the genetics of baby should not be engineered, but I do believe that it should be up to the parent of the children since it is their child in the first place. The argument is between whether or not the United States should or should not prohibit genetically engineered babies.
Fetal farming is the process of collecting eggs that will be made into an embryo (Stark 7). Fetal farming could result in a loss of appreciation for the value that each life holds if scientists are now able to manufacture a life on command (Stark 7). This sentiment is expressed powerfully by Stark in his article on human