ipl-logo

Pro Euthanasia

936 Words4 Pages

According to Paul Keating “Euthanasia is a Threshold Moment We Should Not Cross” from The Sydney Morning Herald, euthanasia is a negative form of treatment for patients with terminal illnesses and has negative effects on other aspects of society. Multiple studies are referenced and examples are given to support the authors claim that euthanasia is wrong and should be avoided. The use of euthanasia is related to assisted suicide or the intentional killing of a patient by physicians. The author also discusses the idea of safeguards that are said to be put in place to protect the patient from any consequences other than to put them out of their pain and misery. Keating debates that these ideas of ‘safeguards’ will not help due to the human error …show more content…

Fisher states that the argument of Pro-euthanasia is the “argument from quality of life”, and whether or not it should be used is specific to the patient’s situation. The two types of euthanasia that are supported by pro-euthanasia, is voluntary and non-voluntary. Voluntary euthanasia is when the patient themselves makes the choice for their lives to be terminated to avoid suffering, but many patients are not physically able to make this large decision themselves. For example, if the patient is in a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS), the decision is made by another person whether it be a family member or caregiver, which is called non-voluntary euthanasia (Fisher …show more content…

Similar to most arguments in this world, the argument of euthanasia has two sides. This means that this option is a compromise for both sides. “‘Agreeing to disagree’ is a philosophically coherent position to advocate given the strong underlyingviews on both sides of the debate” (Holm 399). In the article, “ Euthanasia: agreeing to disagree?”, Holm discusses the advantages of finding common ground and justifies the advocation of a compromise. This would allow the patient to make the decision of voluntary euthanasia, if they were capable of making this decision. Terminally ill patients should have this decision available if they seem necessary for their own lives. Both sides of the argument can be ethically justifiable, although most individuals choose to pick sides, this is why a compromise could be important

Show More
Related

  • Physician Assisted Suicide Ethical Issues

    1290 Words  | 6 Pages

    Introduction People have moral and ethical values that assist them in making decisions about their healthcare on a daily basis. What if a person found out that they had a terminal illness and only had months to live? What if those few months would be filled with treatments, pain and suffering, tear filled family members, and high cost medical bills? Physician- assisted suicide remains a debated topic which causes physicians, nurses and those involved to take a look at what they value and what they are willing to do in order to carry out a patient’s wishes.

    Read More

  • Explain Why Australia Should Regulate Euthanasia

    994 Words  | 4 Pages

    Why Australia shouldn 't regulate euthanasia / Should euthanasia continue to be illegal in Australia. Good afternoon teachers and fellow classmates Imagine a society where people live in constant fear of their lives. Where hospitals don 't treat people for their illnesses but kill them instead because someone determines that their lives are no longer worth living.

    Read More

  • Physician Assisted Suicide Vs Euthanasia

    267 Words  | 2 Pages

    Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia has been one of the most debated subjects in the past years. There are resilient advocates on both sides of the debate for and against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Advocates of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide believe it is a person ’s right to die when faced with terminal illness rather than suffer through to an unpleasant demise. Whereas, opponents contend that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is not only equivalent of murder, but it is ethically and morally incorrect.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Assisted Dying

    838 Words  | 4 Pages

    The main purpose of this chapter is to identify the arguments in favour and against assisted dying and to set out a framework of safeguards that would accompany any changes in legislation. This chapter will help show how the concerns regarding the legalisation of assisted dying are outweighed by the arguments in favour of a change in legislation. One of the strongest and most compelling arguments in favour of assisted dying draws on the importance of autonomy and individual liberty; in a liberal state individual freedoms must be respected, “the right to determine what shall be done with one’s own body is a fundamental right in our society” (Tiensuu,2015, p259). In the UK, people generally have the right to make their own decisions about how

    Read More

  • Euthanasia Rough Draft

    214 Words  | 1 Pages

    Euthanasia Rough Draft Euthanasia has been a big topic of conversation around the United States for the past decade. There are those who are against death by medicine, and those who are for dying with dignity. Right off the back, the words death by medicine and dying with dignity sound a lot different. Those who are pro Euthanasia look at it as ending a persons suffering, and giving them a choice. People against Euthanasia look at it as either suicide or murder, and find it inhumane.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Euthanasia By Philippa Foot

    937 Words  | 4 Pages

    The possible legalization of euthanasia can cause a great disturbance in how people view life and death and the simplicity of how they would treat it. "There are many fairly severely handicapped people for whom a simple, affectionate life is possible." (Foot, p. 94) As demonstrated, the decision of terminating a person 's life is a very fragile and difficult one, emotionally and mentally. Nevertheless, it’s a choice we can make if it is passive euthanasia being expressed.

    Read More

  • Euthanasia Is Wrong Essay

    1376 Words  | 6 Pages

    There is general consensus on the priority value of the right to life, that constitute the material condition of possibility of all others, has certain "privileges". Apart from any moral conviction, the human person is unarguably the hardware of all rights as human life is intrinsically valuable commodity, notwithstanding the right to life conflicts with the right to die with dignity. According to its etymology, euthanasia is a "good death" and according to its original meaning, expresses the dramatic and humanitarian help conduct peaceful and dignified death to those who suffer intense suffering. Euthanasia has been a contentious issue since his emergence. Just Hear the word 'euthanasia' makes us think and reflect on what it entails.

    Read More

  • Pro Euthanasia Speech

    1014 Words  | 5 Pages

    So I implore you, not to look at euthanasia as a choice between life and death, but a choice between peace and misery. Dying is not a

    Read More

  • Euthanasia Is Wrong Essay

    980 Words  | 4 Pages

    They assert that based on these conditions’ of individuals they are of lesser value; and therefore, they should consider ending their natural lives. Euthanasia is, the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. The practice is illegal in most countries (Merriam Webster). The use of euthanasia pressures patients that it is their duty

    Read More

  • Euthanasia Persuasive Speech

    1324 Words  | 6 Pages

    Euthanasia is the practice of painlessly ending a person or animal’s life because they are suffering and cannot be cured. It is a humane option compared to being forced to live out the rest of your life living off a machine and in great pain. Nevertheless, people still find it to be against their morals and do not want it to be in practice. Dating back two centuries, the argument of euthanasia has been debated on whether it should be allowed, and controversy follows it around everywhere it is allowed.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech On Euthanasia

    1075 Words  | 5 Pages

    Euthanasia is usually used to refer to active euthanasia, and in this sense, euthanasia is usually considered to be criminal homicide, but voluntary, passive euthanasia is widely non-criminal. Voluntary Euthanasia is conducted with the consent of the patient while Involuntary Euthanasia is conducted against the will of the patient. Beginning with the philosophical aspects of euthanasia we must first understand the importance of the sanctity of life. Human life is sacred because God made humankind in His own image, and that each individual human

    Read More

  • Euthanasia Is Wrong Essay

    454 Words  | 2 Pages

    Euthanasia Oxford defines Euthanasia as “The painless killing of a patient suffering form an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma.” We must then say that no matter what the situation is, euthanasia means to kill or to murder. The problem we face today is that the contemporary culture has produced many technical terms for euthanasia that justifies murder. Since all people have a knowledge or conviction that it is wrong to kill aonther human being, an argument can also be made that it is wrong to murder those who are terminally ill as well as elderly persons, apart from the teaching of the Bible. The reason for this consideration is based upon the inhierent value of human life and not on the person’s external conditions.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia

    1016 Words  | 5 Pages

    In a few nations there is a divisive open discussion over the ethical, moral, and legitimate issues of euthanasia. The individuals who are against euthanasia may contend for the holiness of life, while defenders of euthanasia rights accentuate mitigating enduring, substantial respectability, determination toward oneself, and individual autonomy. Jurisdictions where euthanasia or supported suicide is legitimate incorporate the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Estonia, Albania, and the US states of Washington. CLASSIFICATION OF EUTHANASIA Euthanasia may be characterized consistent with if an individual

    Read More

  • Controversial Arguments Against Euthanasia

    717 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many agree that a competent and incurable patient should have the right to choose death over many more years of lengthened pain and suffering and have a earlier death since it is inevitable. The Court has already made many more controversial decisions on topics such as marriage, family relationships, procreation, contraception, and the refusal of lifesaving medicine. This should be regarded also. Patient Relief:

    Read More

  • Argument Against Active Euthanasia

    1231 Words  | 5 Pages

    1 Introduction Active euthanasia is brought about when an individual administers or aids in the administration of a lethal substance to another ill or suffering individual. Stansham-Ford v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services (“Stansham-Ford) deals with the application for an order allowing such euthanasia to happen. The judgement of Fabricius J held that so long as certain requirements are met this order should be granted. Considering factors such as the right to life and the right to human dignity in light of this judgement the question is raised as to whether this active euthanasia should be allowed? 2 Current case Stansham-Ford deals with the application to be granted an order allowing a recognised medical practitioner to

    Read More

More about Pro Euthanasia

Open Document