The right to speak is one of the fundamental human rights to maintain a democracy which is defined by the people. Besides that, freedom of speech is to speak without being fear of censoring. Everyone ought to know the situation of their country and have access of information in order to trust the country and the government. Additionally, protecting freedom of speech at all costs is to insulate the speech made regardless of the price that some might have to pay. Freedom of speech is indeed a basic human right, but does protecting free speech includes hate speech?
To put it in easier term civil liberties are things the government can’t do that interfere with a person freedom. For example, the first amendment of the Bill of Rights says the government can’t mess with someone religion or interfere with their practices. 3 Amendment 1 gives the individual liberty from the actions of the government. 2 Civil Rights are curbs on the power of majorities to make decision that would benefit some at the expense of others. To keep in simple terms government made rights where citizens have equal right, and to protect discrimination by
Free speech rights under the First Amendment of the Constitution are the bedrock of our democracy. Any democratic society must place freedom of speech as the cornerstone of all civil liberties. Freedom of speech rights afford citizens the ability to voice their concerns without repercussions from an oppressive government. On the one hand, this sentiment led the founding fathers of this great nation to establish the right to freely criticize the government, should that government become tyrannical. On the other hand, the same civil liberties that allow citizens to freely express their concerns against the government, are the same rights that allow them to express themselves through hateful messages against some sections of the population.
This can be understood form the fact that the preamble of our Indian Constitution ensures to all its citizens, liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship. The aim and goal of this freedom of thought and expression is transformed as a fundamental right under Article 19(1) (a) as “freedom of speech and expression”. Article 19 (1) (a) in its original form read as follows: “All citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression.” This fundamental right was, however, limited by Article 19 (2) which said: “Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause 1 shall affect the operation of any existing law insofar as it relates to or prevents the state from making any law relating to libel, slander, defamation, contempt of court or any matter which offend against decency or morality or which undermines the security of the state or tends to overthrow the
Contrasting to the point above, the case of Charlie Hebdo is also a closely tied in example in regards to one’s right to freedom of speech. Many saw it as a fight towards the ability to speak unreservedly and without the fear of repercussions. People are always quick to point to human rights at the mention of free speech. However, if said freedom puts civilisation into disarray and destruction, where would the place for progress be to begin with? The best way to protect free speech is to prevent it from being misused and becoming a drawback of society.
This effectively shuts down freedom of association and assembly. As you can see, reducing privacy comes with many disadvantages. However, this should not precede over the security of the whole nation. John Stuart Mill stated in his book On Liberty that people should be free to do whatever they wanted, provided they do no harm to others. I believe that this
Freedom of assembly and petition gives every individual the privilege to be anywhere at any time as long as it doesn’t cause violence on public property. All people have the right to practice the freedom but it shouldn’t lead to more
. Although sometimes freedom of expression can cause problems. I believe that freedom of expression is one of the most important freedoms a person can have. It 's important for people to be able to express their opinions and say what they think is right. The right to speak freely serves many capacities.
‘Employers must not enslave their employees, who works for them and this act also prohibits the cruel practices of forced labor’. The Human Rights Act 1998 also supports the liberty and freedom right of the people. Until and unless the central governments or court order to discontinue the practice of these rights, anyone can wander freely wherever they desire anytime. Apart from these features, ‘this act also looks after the rights of people related to the fair trial and endorses punishment only within law complying rubrics’. Another main feature supporting dignity in social care is that it oversees the much coveted feature of the privacy.
A free press is not an optional extra in a democracy.”15 The freedom of speech and expression is regarded as the first condition of liberty.17 The Preamble of the Constitution of India itself secures, to the people, the liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship. Free speech is one of the most coveted fundamental rights in the world. In India, the freedom of speech and expression is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. This is part of the basic fundamental rights. Though the Indian Constitution does not use the expression “freedom of press” in Article 19, but it has been included in one of the guarantees in Article 19(1) (a).