In other words if there was no freedom there wouldn’t be any Freedom of Speech. So, the Freedom Of Speech is based on freedom itself. Word by word it’s defined in as “Right to express one 's ideas and opinions freely through speech, writing, and other forms of communication but without deliberately causing harm to others ' character and/or
Freedom Anyone in the world with an occasional source of internet has no choice but to see the seemingly outrageous news stories, posted weekly on events in the US. American’s have made their distrust in the government more than obvious, which in many cases, the government has provoked. The largest debate in the states today is the with the concept of freedom and where the lines are drawn between social security, equality, and one’s rights. Freedom is and always has been heavily emphasized in the development of the 50 states. It’s brought peace and war both figuratively and literally.
One of the major principles of the United States government has always been the freedom of speech given to its citizens, but what really comes with this freedom? Does this founding principle make it socially acceptable to create uncomfortable environments and use words to injure others? I think this right has limitations anywhere you go. Countries like Israel are making the word Nazi outlawed. And this isn’t because they’re trying to limit and control freedom of speech but rather because of its symbolic meaning in history.
There are many pros and cons to freedom of speech, which is why I am only discussing three pros and cons, that I find that argues the opposite side, to the point it made me undecided on free speech. Starting with pro, I believe that freedom of speech allows people to enable the right to express about personal thoughts, such as expressing your personal opinion on a political debate, or expressing your opinion in a public or campus riot. According to Visionlaunch.com, they state that “this concept allows a person to have the freedom of expressing their public opinion and their thoughts, without the worry of getting fines or jail time even if people don’t agree with you”. How would this impact or affect the people around the world? Well, this would not impact anybody because expressing your opinion on a
Furthermore, freedom of speech is a right given to people. The government assures they will not censor opinions when it states, “Congress shall not make no law...abridging the freedom of speech or of the press,” in the Bill of Rights, (B). The government will not interfere with people’s right to express their opinions, nor will it censor information distributed by the press. The freedoms of religion and speech are vital to American democracy because religion unites and speech enables everyone to have a voice. Freedom of speech and the press ensures that the government does not become corrupt.
These rights have not been violated and have led me to be an active citizen in my community. As with many Americans, the rights listed are some of the most important in defending the liberty of our nation and upholding the values that created our government. Speech may be one of the most integral rights in our nation. Citizens of the United States use it every day to voice their opinion without fear of being harmed by people or by the government. Many people in different nations don’t have this right and have to watch their speech and be fearful of what they may have to face if they voice their disagreements with their governments.
The article then goes on to discuss the importance of Intellectual Freedom and Freedom of Speech in democracy. Oltmann states that Freedom of Speech is necessary to democracy because it allows the circulation of free thought and opinions that then lead to political involvement of Americans. The source then discusses the place that the library and IF
Freedom of speech and expression is regarded as the first condition of liberty. Freedom of speech plays a crucial role in the formation of public opinion on social, political and economic matters. It embraces within its scope, the freedom of propagation and interchange of ideas, dissemination of information which would help formation of one’s opinion and viewpoint and debates on matters of public concerns.  Freedom of speech and expression implies the right to express one 's own convictions and opinions freely by words of mouth, writing, printing, pictures or any other mode. The phrase ‘speech and expression’ used in Article 19(1)(a) has broad connotation.
For the majority of history, governments and societies obstructed free speech. However, since around the 18th century, countries have implemented freedom of speech in their laws. For example, the United States’ first amendment protects from the government interfering with freedom of speech. There are four theories that justify freedom of speech and expression: utility of truth, democratic self-government, individual self-realization, and mixed. Although these theories share some information and reasoning, they contrast each other through different ideas on how freedom of speech is justified.
Should there be limits on freedom of speech? What is meant by freedom of speech? It is the power or right of an individual or community to express one’s opinions and ideas without any fear of retaliation(revenge), censorship (control or suppressing the behavior of others, usually on moral grounds) or sanction (ban, restriction). The term freedom of expression is sometimes used synonymously (closely associated), but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting (conveying) information or ideas regardless of the medium used. Right of free speech in international law: Freedom of speech is cherished (highly valued, honoured) as a fundamental right in modern world and this valuable right in modern world and this valuable right is universally acknowledged (recognized or accepted especially in legal form) and protected as well.