Why on earth would such thing be ever created? Why on earth would our educational, innovating, and advanced systematic school ever implement such technique to check the understanding of their students? Learning checks are probably the worst idea someone could've ever given to our school headmaster. Not only that, but abolish all opportunities for the students to raise their grades. In what world would that benefit our community of hard-working students? I believe that each individual student has their own pace and technique in learning and every individual is different. Students learn differently in different amount of times. How is it fair that a student is tested according to the pace of their learning skills? I believe it is ignorant to trust that only one class is enough to teach a whole lesson and be tested on it the next day. In spite of fact that homework is given, it is not certain that students will learn on their own. Not only that, but being tested the first 10 minutes …show more content…
Most teachers I have spoken to in relation to this new rule, have given me unsatisfactory feedback towards the subject and have confirmed their own unhappiness. A school must have rules and systems that satisfy all of its members, if the school was working fine before, I honestly do not understand why this new system was implemented. Because it was clearly not made for the benefit of the students. I also understand that teachers do not appreciate the extra work of creating quizzes everyday and having to grade them everyday. Not only that, but if their students do not receive good grades on their quizzes, their grades will drop eventually. This is not a good thing for the teachers themselves. If they are IB teachers, this demonstrates that they have not been teaching correctly and they will graded upon their students learning and
In “How Grading Reform Changed Our School,” author Jeffery Erickson, the assistant principal of Minnetonka High School in Minnesota, discusses why and how he and his colleagues changed the way students received their grades. Erickson’s main argument in his essay is, “What should go into a grade?” His answer to this is that a student’s grade is solely reflected based on what a student knows and his or her ability to perform. Erickson opens up his essay by giving a scenario from a personal experience of when his daughter took swimming lessons. It was a challenge for his daughter to master the class, but in the end she finally passed on the last day.
“Oh, another?” You groan as you sit down, and you probably won’t get up for several more hours. Thus begins the fourth day of standardized testing. Students should not have to take standardized testing because it takes up too much class time, it puts stress on teachers and students, and students already take too many tests in each subject.
The tests are graded by a special machine that is not programmed to favor some students and not others. Yes, the tests are being graded non-discriminately but, this causes some concern for whether or not the tests are being graded accurately. Technology has been known to fail some times. The machines are very sensitive and the answers have to be filled in clearly and in a certain way or they will be counted wrong. Some students may know the answer but mark it wrong and their score will go down unfairly.
Over the past three decades’ educational leadership has been in search of ways to increase student literacy in urban middle schools in the southeast sections of the District of Columbia. The quest to closing achievement gaps in urban school districts have and will always be an on-going issue for educational leadership (Daly & Chrispells, 2008). Findings from research studies suggest that school leadership accounts for fully one quarter of total school effects on pupils, making it second only to classroom instruction among school-based factors affecting student achievement (Leithwood, Louis, Anderson & Wahlstrom, 2004). There are certain challenges that middle school principals face that pertain only to these middle school principals due to
Texas School Testing Learning is an amazing, beautiful, and helpful process of the mind. It lets us recall things that we have come to understand; learn. We learn about the people, the world, the challenges humanity has faced, wars fought over time. Texas has many schools and the main goal for these school 's is that the student 's pass rather than anything else. The only thing is, without understandment and knowledge of what we are supposed to be learning, how are we going to pass these test.
These new tests must be done away with until there is a chance that they will be properly revised so the vast majority of students can understand the questions
Class is already very tiring, think of adding hour long test. Children working as hard as possible, but secretly wondering when this dreadful test is going to be over. You could be learning more valuable information, that could be used for more classroom test. Speaking of the classroom testing why would you want students to test any more. Students who have to test weekly know where I’m coming from what is the point of testing weekly just to lead up to an even bigger test.
It creates difference. It won’t consider testing preconditions like family cases and testophobia. Teachers only teach for the test prepared by the county. It won’t test a tremendous progress made by students.
Does Standardized Test Define You As A Person? School isn’t about learning anymore it’s about teaching us to pass a test! To expect the average student to manage their already challenging schedule while simultaneously studying for the ACT or SAT is unrealistic and unfair. American students are spending most of their school hours preparing for standardized tests rather than learning quality stuff. Some American schools test over every subject putting even more pressure students.
Smarter Balanced Assessment: Pro or Con? Smarter Balanced Assessment, who is it truly assessing, the teachers or the students? Smarter Balanced testing contributes to the teacher’s performance, but is it beneficial or does it have unintended consequences? Students are ultimately grading the teachers by taking these tests and they are not even aware of it. The disadvantages may outweigh the benefits for this topic, but teachers must look past the disadvantages and do what they were meant to do, teach.
In fact 70 percent of educators surveyed in 2015 say that tests are not developmentally appropriate. Furthermore many students suffer a great deal of stress because of standardized tests. What’s most shocking is that instead of lower income schools getting better after tests were implemented they have actually gotten worse. School could essentially be taught by robots. At this point most teachers in my district have to teach a curriculum that is developed by the state instead of their own curriculum.
Secondly, timed tests can create negative messages about the subject. Lastly, students are so focused on the time constraint that they often don’t show their full abilities. While some opposers may tell you that timed tests are great to see who knows the material and
The problem with that is, students won’t know, how well they’re doing in their classes; and are they understanding the concepts that are being taught? Some concepts that are taught in school can be tricky, without being given grades, or standardized testing, students won’t have the skills for when post-secondary comes around. Studying and tests are important for learning, as it will help the student learn more, and be prepared for post-secondary, when they’re given homework and
Why the school system is bad - Arshia Education is very important for everyone and it will only get more important. Schooling is just plain bad. It used to serve a purpose, like the heart in a person 's body, but now it is basically just boring students more and more. Nowadays at the end of the day, we all just want to go home.
1. Describe an example of your leadership experience in which you have positively influenced others, helped resolve disputes, or contributed to group efforts over time. I consider myself a leader, i believe this because i am the type of person that feels like if i am not the one to do it then it will not be done the right way. Whenever i would work in groups i would designate myself to be the one to do the harder assignment, because i only trusted that would take it serious, not anyone else. Also, whenever i do anything that involves a team, i like to take control, because i feel like i am the best one to work under pressure or i can choose the best solution for any situation.