Do you know that based on the scientific studies, 90% human cloning tuned out to be unsuccessful. Human cloning(modifying babies) is a process of producing new identical babies by altering their genomes. Some of studies show that scientists successfully cloned animals such as cows, Pigs, and sheep. For the past 3-5 years human cloning have a lot of debates and controversies between peoples. However Human cloning is dangerous for the new engineered baby and their moms, so it should be banned to prevent new disease, to constantly limit the population of dying human beings, and to stop unnecessary fees to modify babies.
There is a very high risk of failure and an endless amount of dysfunctions and illnesses awaiting the clone. However there is a very small population of people that believe cloning should be legal. Arguing that if it is wrong to experiment by cloning animals then it should be illegal to test beauty products on animals. Personally I believe that cloning is unethical and cruel. It is true that scientists are trying to save endangered species by cloning them.
Cloning many organisms may result in loss of diversity in genes. This would affect us because cloning makes organisms with identical genes, which can restrain or indeed end uniqueness. When scientist clone, everybody would have identical genotypes This may result in
Whether that be the researchers in charge of the cloning project, the companies opening it up to the public, or the public that wants to partake of the cloning opportunity, all of these would not have something that they had before if cloning was outlawed in the United States. Many researchers are in support of cloning because they feel that cloning opens up many doors and possibilities in the research world. This stems from a common issue faced in research... not having a control that is alike enough to be accurate. A solution to this issue per researchers is to have the controls (lab rats) all be cloned. With the ability to clone, all the rats would be genetically identical and therefore the control would be more reliable.
Human cloning is one of the newest topics that is changing the world because of how wasteful, harmful they are.The human clone will cause many issues that would waste supplies, and hurt humans.The first idea of a clone was brought up in 1866 when Gregor mendel discovers genetics and how it multiplies, which he later discovered would cause harm to people in the future.This harm is coming now now and this is why human cloning needs to be eliminated because, it affects everyday people, our resources, like medicine. Also human clone would keep expanding causing a total outburst. The first time people realized cloning was possibly was in 1866 according to cloning historical timeline, but ever since then the idea has gotten much bigger. human cloning is an identical copy of
Simply mentioning the word cloning is likely to generate a debate. The cost of cloning on society cannot be overlooked. It is an extremely inefficient procedure and most clones do not survive. The clones that survive birth often have mental and/or physical problems. Although cloning animals and humans can have many advantages, the risks and ethical dilemmas are greater than the benefits.
There is also a huge part of literature citing high percentage of miscarriage, stillbirth, early death, genetic abnormalities, and chronic diseases among cloned animals. Cloning also raises ethical problems in a sense that it violates the prohibitions or ideology regarding the law of nature. It may have harmful consequences to animals, human beings or the environment, in the sense of animal cloning can be perfected and the cloning techniques can be applied to human. There is already information that scientists are experimenting with human reproductive cloning and the animal cloning techniques can serve as the guide for perfecting human cloning. In both agricultural cloning and cloning for conservation, cloned animals may have a insistent shock on the environment,
Approximately in 46 countries, including some states of US, Australia, Austria, Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, the Czech Republic, Costa Rica, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, and others, reproductive cloning is illegal. Although in many countries, therapeutic cloning and regenerative medicine are not just legal but also financed by the government (Cloning
This research may achieve to alleviate the desperate shortage of human tissues for transplantation. The differentiation process may control at least some cancer cells: Other gain from cloning is inducing cancer cells to differentiate. Because many types of cancer cells are less specialized than their normal counterparts, so precursors of cancer cells could be stem cells that fail to complete differentiation and then by using information gained from nuclear transfer technology we may be able to stop making tumors by induce the cells to mature. Conclusion In conclude, in the last 40 years molecular cloning has progressed from isolating and piecing two pieces of DNA together then screening of potential clones to assembling up to 10 DNA fragments with remarkable efficiency in few hours to designing DNA molecules and synthesizing them in vitro. All of these technologies give molecular biologists a powerful toolbox for exploring, manipulating and harnessing DNA so that make more possibilities to develop safer recombinant proteins for the treatment of diseases, quicker validation and release of new vaccines and also enhancement of gene
However, in human beings, the percentage may lower and may interfere with the natural biological order of life. Arguments for and against cloning of humans do not make a convincing case since reasons used to back the claims are based on various assumptions and ethical issues. The proponents of cloning argue that the technology can help in solving the problem of infertility; help in cloning dead loved ones, and solving the problem of genetic diseases. Cloning can allow a person to have a genetically copy of oneself with all positive traits. However, such claims have not been proved since no human clone has been produced so far (Melo‐Martín 246).