ipl-logo

Examples Of Intellectual Pluralism

987 Words4 Pages

I will do an essay on the heated topic of intellectual pluralism. As an international affairs student with a multicultural background, I believe I am able to give my arguments on this topic. Intellectual pluralism does not belong in a democracy because it does not respect its basic definition and encourages intolerance. Consequently, I will present three assertion proving the fallibility of the idea of intellectual pluralism, and therefore, offer an in depth examination of the arguments in its favor, followed by my answer, which defends the opposite vision: purism. As previously stated in this essay, this text defends one position, purism, against an other one, intellectual pluralism. The principle of pluralism is saying that people of different …show more content…

Our western societies are in majority democracies. According to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, « Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the principle of holding periodic and genuine elections by universal suffrage are essential elements of democracy. » This means that human rights is a right included in democracy. As stated by Lord Bhikhu Parekh “Although free speech is an important value, it is not the only one. Human dignity, equality, freedom to live without harassment and intimidation, social harmony, mutual respect, and protection of one’s good name and honor are also central to the good life and deserve to be safeguarded. Because these values conflict, either inherently or in particular contexts, they need to be balanced.” Even in our democracies, where free speech is claimed every day by million of people as a complete right to express their opinion, as hurtful as it could be, intellectual pluralism should not belong there. Democracies are created for people’s regulation, satisfaction (« government (...) for the people ») and happiness (proved by the interest created by the notion of Gross National Happiness, which could measure it), and letting everyone express their hate or harm someone orally could attack this idea of happiness promoted by many governments. As a consequence, the Secretary General of the United Nations write a « Model Law Against Racial Discrimination » which restricts the freedom of opinion, expression, and peaceful assembly: « it shall be an offense to threaten, insult, ridicule or otherwise abuse a person or group of persons with words or behavior which may be interpreted as an attempt to cause racial discrimination or racial hatred »; « it shall be an offense to defame an individual or group of individuals on racial grounds. Organizations which

Show More
Related

  • Supreme Court Case: Brown V. Board Of Education

    190 Words  | 1 Pages

    Organizations like the Council of Federated Organization

    Read More

  • Hate Crime Legislation

    111 Words  | 1 Pages

    Conversely, under hate crime legislation it is clear to see that the prosecution of hate crimes further divides society by reinforcing the marginalisation of minority groups. Advocates with ideologies akin to this state that all violent crimes are the result of the offender’s absolute contempt for the victim of the hate crime. In such cases like this, all crimes are hate crimes and if no alternate rationale for prosecuting some people more harshly than others for the same crime based on who the victim is, a situation arises where different offenders charged with the same offence are treated unequally under the law which inadvertently creates discrimination, prejudices and unfairness in society.

    Read More

  • Canadian Charter Of Rights Essay

    1056 Words  | 5 Pages

    As part of a democracy, one is free to make their own lawful choices and to express their own opinions.

    Read More

  • Hate Speech Should Be Protected Under The First Amendment

    1245 Words  | 5 Pages

    Berlatsky pronounces how if certain groups who practice hate speech such as Nazis, those who hold extreme racist or authoritarian views, are silenced, other groups will be silenced as well. Therefore, he concludes how, “You need to protect people who hate marginalized people, or marginalized people will be targeted next” (Berlatsky par. 2). In the article, the author includes a quote by John Moore on how how society should not defend Nazis “and other purveyors of hate speech, [instead] a more balanced approach is needed” (Berlatsky par. 1). Therefore, the author also agrees with pro-ban hate speech supporters on how defending Nazis does not strengthen the system of free

    Read More

  • School Start Later Research Paper

    558 Words  | 3 Pages

    Is a quote that helps me validate that there is an organization that

    Read More

  • Jeremy Waldron The Harm In Hate Speech Summary

    1125 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Harm In Hate Speech Jeremy Waldron is a University Professor at the New York University School of Law where he has written and published in the area of legal positivism and political theory. He writes his books and articles on theories of rights, constitutionalism, the rule of law, and on democracy endorsing speech law legislation (Biography). In his book, “The Harm in Hate Speech,” Waldron claims that people’s dignity should be protected against hate speech and needs to be a part of hate speech legislation. In chapter 5, “Protecting dignity or Protection from Offense,” he insists that hate speech laws should protect someone’s dignity from verbal assault but not from them being offended, saying that offense has nothing to do with

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The First Amendment

    1228 Words  | 5 Pages

    Abuse of freedom of speech can be defined as hate speech or such speech that instigates and can create many negative impacts. Rosenbaum highlights research that shows “participants who were subjected to both physical and emotional pain, that emotional harm is equal in intensity to that experienced by the body and is even more long-lasting and traumatic” (1125). In the case of discriminatory language, if truly it is problematic, then some form of law limits and restricts it. While it is said that hate speech can cause negative effects on one’s mental and physical health, it was never isolated to be the sole cause of these impacts. Although hate speech may contribute, it is unreasonable to blame emotional harm on hate speech as the world arguably contains plenty of negative things that people are exposed to daily and can easily poison someone’s mind.

    Read More

  • Apush Dbq Imperialism

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    Political rights protect an individual's freedom, so, it outraged citizens when they realized the instability of the Great Britain’s democracy. In theory, a lack of democracy and political rights is a lack of freedom. Democracy has shown to be important all throughout history, because it gives citizens opportunities to participate in the government; electing leaders, help create laws, etc. Democracy cannot been used to create enormous empires, but it has been a popular form of government because it generally keeps the country in peace and prosperity. Political rights are essential for a strong and vigorous country, because they protect a person’s basic freedoms.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Should Hate Be A Crime By James B. Jacobs

    565 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this article, Jacobs successfully makes his argument by remaining objective, appealing more toward the ethos and logos of the reader, and limiting emotional language. Jacobs aims his article toward lawmakers and voters. Motives are subjective and based on many factors; therefore, Jacobs argues that basing hate crime off of motive does not only create hardships but also flaws. He continues his argument by looking at rights given to the people from the First Amendment. According to the First Amendment, people possess many freedoms including the freedom of speech; however, Jacobs argues how hate crimes

    Read More

  • The Indispensable Opposition Analysis

    289 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the article, “The Indispensable Opposition,” author, Walter Lippmann, argues his claim that we must view the freedom of oppositions as a way to improve our decisions in a democratic society rather than just tolerating that freedom of speech. When freedom of speech is tolerated and only seen as a right to speak, Lippmann believes that the liberty of opinion becomes a luxury. Moving forward, Lippmann then states that we must understand that the freedom of speech for our opponents are a vital necessity since it provides our own opinions to grow in improvement. Through practical experience, we realize we need the freedom of opposition and is no longer just our opponent ’s right.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Hate Speech

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    The ability to speak freely is written in the bill of rights and has been preserved for decades, but when free speech turns into hate speech it brings up the widely deliberated issue about banning hate speech. There are many different perspectives on the issue of hate speech. Author of Hate Speech is Free Speech, Gov. Dean and Law professor, Glenn Harlan Reynolds, applies a strong historical perspective on the situation arguing that people are “constitutionally illiter[ate]” when they make the claim that hate speech is not part of the First Amendment. Believing that it is impossible to ban hate speech because everyone will always disagree with any idea, Reynolds focuses on the problems with banning hate speech and what might happen if hate

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Freedom Of Speech

    817 Words  | 4 Pages

    The fact that one has the right to say and believe is the foundation for democracy to function. If no one dared to say their opinions, then it had become a dictatorship where only one opinion on how society and the country should work had been the “right”. If people dared to express their opinions, they will help improving the society one lives. Freedom of speech gives one the responsibility to consider what fits into different contexts, and it will make us better persons and people. Simply, people will feel safe in the society they live in.

    Read More

  • Hate Speech: The Freedom Of Speech

    1318 Words  | 6 Pages

    The time in which we live is the age of communication and the speech or talking one of the important ways of communication and expression. There are different types of Speech and communicate, one of them hate speech. Hate speech means attacking a person or group based on different basis such as gander, religion, race, ethnic origin or nationality and disability. In the other hand, some of human rights treaties agree with freedom of speech or freedom of expression it could offend or disturb others so government of Countries placed laws of hate speech to avoid harms, troubles and problems. Over years Hate speech law became one of the most known laws in international law.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Constructivism In International Relations

    1266 Words  | 6 Pages

    In this paper, I have attempted to present an understanding of Pakistan-India conflict by using constructivism theory of international relations. There are many reasons other than strategic reason causing this conflict like differences in ideologies, norms and beliefs. There are also cultural differences between these two nations. 2. Pakistan-India Conflict an overview South Asia is considered a region of great importance in the world.

    Read More

  • Advantages Of Freedom Of Speech

    2363 Words  | 10 Pages

    1.0 INTRODUCTION In the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), freedom of speech falls under the Article 19 which is the freedom of opinion and expression. It protects one’s freedom ‘to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers’ (The United Nations, 1948). Article 19(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) adds that the freedom of expression could be ‘either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice’. Besides being an individual’s fundamental liberty of expression, Santa Clara University School of Law Professor Russell W. Galloway (1991) states that free speech is the ‘matrix of all other freedoms’.

    Read More

More about Examples Of Intellectual Pluralism

Open Document