The Pros And Cons Of Miscarriage Of Justice

1497 Words6 Pages
Miscarriage of justice, is primarily a man 's conviction and punishment for a crime he or she did not commit. The term can also be applied to the wrong in the other direction - "impunity error" while civil cases. Most of the criminal justice system have some means to overthrow, or "undo" a false belief, but it is often difficult to achieve. In some cases, a false belief is not overturned several years, or innocent people being executed, until discharged from custody, or already dead. "Miscarriage of justice", sometimes equivalent to wrongful conviction, refers to an unfair trial reached or controversial beliefs. Opponents of the death penalty is often quoted reason for miscarriage of justice in order to eliminate the death penalty, in order…show more content…
Where the condemned man was convicted after a swift execution, the most significant impact of a miscarriage of justice is irreversible. Wrongly executed people still occasionally receive a posthumous pardon, basically lose faith, or have their own beliefs revoked. Many countries with a condemnation of the death penalty before the execution for 10 years or more, so any new evidence, they might not guilty (or, at least, provide a reasonable doubt), there will be enough time to emerge. Even if people do not perform miscarriage of justice, may be a substantive years imprisonment and irreversible impact on people and their families. The risk of a miscarriage of justice, and therefore the parameters of long sentences, such as life imprisonment, but the sentence under brutal conditions. Incidence [Edit] Various studies estimate that in the United States, between 2.3 and 5 percent of all prisoners are innocent. [2] The study estimated that as many as 10,000 people may be wrongly convicted of serious crimes each year.
Open Document