Kayla Tempelhoff Argumentative essay topic 9
Modern day technology has allowed a free flow of information between the source and the audience. This has, in turn, created an audience with an ever increasing demand for information. Audiences and voting populations, especially regarding political leaders, deserve to know all the information which may influence their vote. However, there is a line between useful information and reality tv-show indulgence. Encroaching upon a political figure’s privacy can have consequences which further affect their performance and put them under strain and allows opponents to make personal attacks which bear no relevance to political affairs. Furthermore, the domestic behaviour of a politician does not offer any
…show more content…
A job has working hours and demands which are expected to be met; beyond that there is no need for the public to have access to information and knowledge that extends into the politician’s private life. Already being under a vast amount of pressure this invasion of their privacy can bring family or personal drama to the surface. An example of this is the Bill Clinton- Monica Lewinsky affair scandal, where president at the time, Bill Clinton, was accused of having an affair with his intern, Monica Lewinsky. They both denied accusations which prompted the impeachment of Bill Clinton despite his success as a president; being responsible for the lowest employment rate in 30 years.
Furthermore, allowing the public access to political leaders’ private information allows for personal attacks which bear no importance to political issues. This is where political opponents and the public use private details to attack a politician’s character. An example of this is with Donald Trump, where the media brought to surface, a clip of him from before the presidential campaigns making a derogatory comment about women. However controversial this may seem, it detracts from his actual ideals as a president and his ability to run a
Merry had access to a client’s confidentially information. We do not know how Merry is going to use the information learned about the prominent public figure. The information Merry had access to can be damaging to the client public image. This affects the well-being of the client. The therapist’s inability to maintain confidentiality affects the beneficence of the client.
Albert Einstein once said, “I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation full of idiots” (Einstein). Unfortunately, that day has already come as technology has far beyond exceeded human interaction. Fortunately, an event has been established to help the world unplug. “Shut Down Your Screen Week” (SFW) is an annual event, encouraging families, schools, and communities to turn off screens and “turn on life.”
When politicians do something unpleasant, they get rid of it consequence, like what happened to president Nixon for his participation in the Watergate break in. The Watergate break in is when five men were caught looking for documents that might harm the candidacy of the Democratic nominee, George McGovern. Nixon stooped the FBI investigation, and claimed that its executive privilege, also he said that would risk the national security. People argue that if the political system advantage or disadvantage the abuse of power. Looking at the Watergate break in, we can tell that the American political system advantage abuse of power.
During and ending this time period Parsons establishes the beginning of modern politics. Candidates began publicly exposing the transgressions of each other’s personal professional lives. These disclosures were very ugly, as have occurred in 2017. Sexual affairs, debt, families, wives, numerous wives, slaveholder, etc. have been drawn into political voting procedures.
The “Nothing-to-Hide Argument” Analyzed: In this rhetorical analysis, I will be taking a look at Daniel J. Solove’s essay “The Nothing-to-Hide Argument,” which is about privacy in the context of personal information and government data collection (Solove 734). Solove’s main argument in his essay is that the general public has a narrow perception of what privacy really is. The purpose behind his main argument is to expose the problems with the nothing-to-hide argument while presenting a way to challenge it for his target audience, government officials. Solove’s argument to his target audience is effective through his exemplary use of substance, organization, and style in his essay.
Argumentative Essay Nowadays, computers can be found in many stores, every market, every home you can easily find a computer which is made by several companies. Many of the companies we know, such as Acer, Dell Toshiba are available easily in many stores. These computers are programmed with Windows and have programs from Microsoft. Another company called Apple, Makes Computers called Macintosh or Mac for short. There is a competition of on the market with The Apple’s Macintosh with The Windows PC.
People use a wide variety of techniques when attempting to persuade one another. One of the most commonly used persuasive techniques is rhetoric; A language utilized by speakers and writers as a form of persuasion. Some of society’s most prominent influences use rhetoric, such as politicians, celebrities, and the media. Politicians use the rhetoric ethos to emphasize their trustworthiness by describing past experiences as a politician, and pathos to focus on examples of the vulnerable or emotionally appealing in order to persuade voters. Politicians sway voters by using past experiences in order to build credibility among an audience.
Once her identity became public knowledge, there was damage to the company. How will Catherine’s coworkers react towards her if they feel that whatever they do may be released for public consumption? How will that executive continue to operate with credibility with the firm’s clients? Gossip can be very damaging to an organization. I found this situation similar to case study 4.
Is technology bad for us? Who knew that technology usage can lead to memory problems? Since browsing through social media is very common nowadays, the brains are bombarded with electronic information. From instant messaging to blogs, it is easy to forget some things. Over the years, the debate about whether or not technology has a positive, or negative impact on society gets talked about on many sites and social media platforms.
In 2015, the most recent scandal involves Hillary’s use of her personal email and its relation with classified information. Hillary has debated claims that she was involved with sending classified information and instead, should have just been sending everything through a governmental
What and how the politician’s message is said influences the audience and “the type of political opinions held by participators, not simply their demographic makeup… influences the policy-making process” (Best and Krueger, 198). Perhaps through powerful, moving speeches and plans that appeal to a large portion of the audience in addition to using the Internet, the candidate may benefit substantially. Another explanation is that citizens “either choose to consume political content or they do not” based on their interests and motivations (Howard, 169). In order to win elections, must appeal to a large portion of the audience in order for them to vote for candidates; it is not the Internet that is the tool for having political campaign success, but it is how the candidate is able to appeal to the audience. Factors from physical campaigns, such as “physical resources, human resources, [all] in the form of Internet skills, increase the likelihood of online political activity” that candidates must effectively utilize to best portray themselves in a positive light (Best and Krueger, 193).
Many people can agree that the introduction of technology into society has impacted humans a lot. Kids are using cell phones, computers are used in schools. Technology is everywhere in people’s lives. But the true question is whether or not technology is ruining people. Starting from the fact that kids are getting less and less physical activity due to technology, technology also ruins social skills in people, and the fact that technology is very dangerous, technology is ruining people.
New technologies that people had never imagined a decade, or even some decades ago, are now expanding and changing all our lives. Taking smartphones as an example, people in old time had never imagined that small, tiny box could enable people to bring smart computer to everywhere. Yet, smartphones are now completely embedded into our lives and changed how we communicate. Technology lets us live simply, more conveniently, and more easily, but at the same time, it creates complex debates and controversies of ethical problems. In this world, where humans cannot live without the benefits of technology, it is impossible to ignore ethical problems.
We depend too much on technology. There is no doubt about it. Many places of work are at a loss if their internet connection stops working. Many businesses and institutions are left high and dry if the internet or computer crashes. Every bit of information regarding business is entered into the computer.
Task 2 2B Digital technology ¬– a health threat? We live in a rapidly changing, highly technological world, where the present day digital technology affects several parts of our lives. At work, people use digital technology to communicate, gather information and solve problems relevant to their place of work. A growing number of people also use digital technology at home, to keep in touch with friends and family, check bank balances, play interactive games, participate in online forums and interact with others on social media websites and mobile apps, such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.