Argumentative Essay On Second Hand Smoking

Second-hand smoke (SHS) is one of the top suspects for polluted air and damaged health. It’s a combination of the smoke exhaled by the smoker and the burning tip of the cigarette. It’s made up of hundreds of dangerous chemicals that, to say the least, irritate the lining of the lungs, cause tissue damage and alter organ functions, as stated by Jones, P. (2014). The first to ban smoking in the workplace in the world was Ireland, followed by many other countries, in an attempt to shield people from the dangers of SHS. Since 2004, many countries have gone smoke-free, rescuing millions by prohibiting smoking in public places. The European Union is now looking into implementing no-smoking laws in all 27 nations. According to Connolly, G. (2007), a professor in the public health practice department at Harvard, who pioneered the Massachusetts ban while heading the state’s tobacco control program, a global smoke-free movement is underway, and likely past a tipping point. “The world has begun to reclaim clean “indoor” air as a social norm,” he says. Opponents allegedly claim that the smoking ban is killing the hospitality business, and that the studies supporting the ban only assessed the short-term effects. But how couldn’t anyone support it when SHS could be costing us a massive 19,400 lives a year? And when the ban not only spares us the serious illness, but also elevates our health immensely? Opposers of the law argue that the smoking ban is bad for the hospitality