Ron Reagan once said, “Stem cell research can revolutionize medicine, more than anything since antibiotics.” Stem cells have the possibility to become many different cell types and can be used to replenish other cells. The government should fund stem cell research because it has the possibility to help many people. Specialized cells that group together to form tissues that have specific functions in the body can be replenished with stem cells. Research of stem cells should be fully funded by the government because the cells have the possibility to become any other cell in the body.
All stem cells start out as unspecialized but will later become part of a specialized group of cells. A stem cell is able to develop into any type of cell.
…show more content…
Blood forming stem cells found in bone marrow have been used for over 40 years. Adult stem cells can have the possibility to become an essential part in transplantation based therapies. In experiments scientists shown that adult stem cells can be reprogramed into different cell types. The stem cells are reprogramed by genetic modification. They can then replace cells that were destroyed because of a disease. Adult stem cells have the possibility to become like embryonic stem cells. By introducing embryo genes to the adult cells it can reprogram them. This allows the cells to originate from the donor and they won’t be foreign to the other cells in the body. Adult stem cells are less abundant than embryonic stem cells. They are found throughout the body in places like the heart, bone marrow, and the brain.
The other side of the issue wonders if the destruction of an embryo justified. I think that the government should provide funding for stem cell research. The cells in the fertilized embryo don’t begin to form systems or tissues until 14 days. The research of those cells will make advances in the medical field and will save countless
Despite the good that has come from the cells it does not take away from the fact that these
The goal with fetal tissue research is to find new and improved ways of dealing with diseases. Almost everyone in our country has used a source that has come from the research of fetal tissue. (Fetal tissue, 5) So on the ethics and morals side of the argument any fetal tissue used for research has helped saved millions of people from dealing with diseases such as chickenpox, flu, etc. The argument most people make is that abortion is evil and shouldn’t be supported.
Though technology at some point will likely make this possible, “human cloning is scientifically distant at best” and “the scientific community has universally condemned it” (Acost and Golub 429). Without the support of the possible creators of this technology, there is no way that this would ever come about, and it remains irrelevant to the known information about the benefits stem cell research would have on the world of healing medicine. At the center of the controversy lies politics and the continuous battle between being supportive of the research and respecting the beliefs of American groups. Starting in 1995, legislation took on the topic of stem cell research by creating the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.
After reading about therapeutic cloning, I’ve come to the conclusion that it is no different than what researchers are trying to do with ES cell research. The difference in the process is that the egg is penetrated, without destroying it and the nucleus is removed with the host DNA and replaced with a nucleus from the cell of the donor that requires the ES cell for therapy. At that point the egg is left to develop into a blastocyst using the donor DNA and the process of extracting the inner cell mass to cultivate the stem cells that are genetically compatible with the
For example, Alzheimer’s disease is a disease that is caused by brain cell death. Alzheimer’s does not have a cure, and the only treatment for it is medication that will slow the death of cells. However, if embryonic stem cells were used, they could replace and, theoretically, stop the death of brain cells, which would in turn, halt the disease. So overall, this treatment could dramatically benefit patients struggling through diseases like Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, cancer, and diabetes. Furthermore, the increase of quality of life for these living people is more than worth the possible destruction of a cluster of
Over the years, there have been many controversial issues surrounding medical research, but one of the most arguable topics of all time is the use of embryonic stem cells. Some individuals believe that extracting stem cells from unborn babies will be useful to create new medications or, in most cases, help regenerate damaged cells. Although, many people disagree with the process scientists use to obtain these stem cells. By continuing embryonic stem cell research, scientists are denying an unborn child the chance to live, they are not letting nature take its intended course, and they are not adhering to the religious or moral beliefs of many people.
Doris Gudino Professor Chounlamountry Political Science 1 27 July 2015 Pro-Choice Anyone? A woman has, undoubtedly, the freedom to procreate, but once a woman chooses to retreat from that freedom, a commotion arises. Abortion is a woman’s choice for many reasons. It’s her body, therefore, no one else can decide for said person.
They are able to use gene editing technology on adult stem cells, which are able to transform into any cell that is needed. The transformed stem cells would be able to repair any damaged tissue of the eye, helping treat the eye conditions (Obesity, Fitness & Wellness Week). While many people focus on the many medical possibilities that would come with gene editing, others are
Stem cells have the potential to cure specific diseases such as Parkinson 's, Alzheimer 's, Diabetes, and Cancer. A few years ago, you could only get stem cell transplants from specific doctors, But as of 2015 there are 170 clinics that can do the procedure. The way that they implant the stem cells into the patient 's body is by putting the cells straight into the bloodstream or by inserting the cells into the patient 's bone marrow. They extract all of the stem cells that they need and then they take out the patient 's dead stem cells and put in the donor 's healthy stem cells.
One of the most important arguments to this debate is presented through the scientific lens. Although embryonic stem cells pose enormous potential to treat and cure diseases and conditions, adult stem cells are more effective in treating these conditions. Adult stem cells pose a much lesser risk of forming tumors or not functioning as originally intended (Smith). Adult stem cells are also currently used today, as bone marrow transplants are a form of stem cell treatment (Stem Cells in Use).
Hook Let’s say the government chose what you wear, what you eat, how and when you sleep, what career you pursue and who you marry. Wouldn’t you deem this strict? Unfair? Stupid even? Why then do we believe that we or the government should have a say in a woman’s choice of aborting a fetus?
Science has enabled us to thrive in a world where change is a must if an organism wishes to live. It has allowed for us to bend and twist the world at our feet, even having enough strength to repel the touch of death. Genetic engineering is the next scientific advancement that will stand close in the near future. It has the capability of modifying the food production process, elimination of diseases and disorders, and the guarantation of the best traits in an organism.
The term ‘gene editing’ helps people understand how the technology works, but it also suggests a level of precision and safety that at least for now isn’t there.” Furthermore, some people may need to use another women’s egg for this process, whether to replace their egg or to have in addition to their egg. Three-parent babies are human offspring with three genetic parents, created through a specialized form of in vitro fertilization in which the future baby's mitochondrial DNA comes from a third party. The
Regenerative medicine has a cure to failing or damage tissues. Stem cell increase years to human life, cure disorder and it also includes make one seems juvenile. As a result this gives leisure to the opening of stem cell clinics to the public in the Philippines. Cellular Therapeutics Center of Makati
Many questions arise when discussing such controversial issues (Jaenisch et al.). Some of these questions include "the central, apparently unresolvable issue of the moral status of the human embryo, which raises questions about which perspectives should govern appropriate pluralistic policy" (Jaenisch et al.). There are also questions as to how to weigh the "possible scientific breakthroughs" with the "less quantifiable values and perspectives" (Jaenisch et al.). While there are decent arguments on how the copying of a human being could be