Argumentative Essay On The Right To Bear Arms

Now, I can agree with some of the laws the movement is pushing but most of it can easily be debunked. If the nation wants stricter background checks and mental health checks I completely agree with those statements. But, raising the purchasing limit to 21 for a rifle does not help anything, the child who tried to shoot up a Maryland was a seventeen-year-old student and he had a handgun (which is only permitted until the age of 21). What I am saying, is a criminal can easily get their hands on a firearm if they wanted to. But too strict of gun control can lead to great, law abiding citizens without protection of their selves or their families.

Also, it good for civilians know the laws of the land as well, in case an officer goes against them, so the individual can protect them self’s and educate if

“We the People of The United States of America,” is the beginning of our Constitution. Within the constitution are the Amendments, the first ten are known as the Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment is the one I would like to speak about. The Second Amendment of The United States Constitution reads: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Due to the gun violence in the United States over the past two decades I would propose amending the Second Amendment; to incorporate gun control.

To fully understand the argument, a full background of how gun laws have evolved is necessary. James Madison is a consequential writer who proposed the right to bear arms, which is the driving factor for the second amendment. This is the basis of the general knowledge of guns

The second amendment was not just meant for the people to just own firearms. The second amendment was made so that the people have a right to a militia, and guns, if a tyrannical government took over. The constitution also states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State... ”(US Const. amend.

The shooting caused a debate on gun control and school safety. The two men were Eric Harris ,18 and Dylan Klebold, 17 who were being bullied and that caused them to do the shooting.2 The event of the columbine massacre affected the people nearest to those killed and disbelief that this could have been on school grounds. The Columbine Massacre changed everyone 's life not only the victims, but the parents all around the world. After the shooting

There was also an incident in California were a shooter by the named of Elliot Rodger took medications for his Asperger’s disorder. This article assessed four assumptions that are associated with the aftermath of mass shootings. They are, mental illness causes gun violence, psychiatric diagnosis can predict gun crime before it happens, U.S. mass shootings teach us to fear the loners who are mentally ill, and because of these complex psychiatric histories of these shootings, gun control won’t prevent another

Positive Impact of Guns In America Americans have the privilege and the right to purchase and own personal firearms for the means of self defense. Some citizens, however, exploit this right for the sole purpose of harming those around them. Mass shootings are some of the most common and terrifying events that can happen to someone in America today. Despite all the harm that guns cause, they should not be banned because they also have many positive effects for the American people that we would not want to lose.

Most people assume that guns are supposed to be very dangerous, risky and harmful. However, that is not true; guns can be unsafe and dangerous, but only if they are in the wrong hands, in that case anything could be dangerous if it’s in the wrong hands. Owning a gun is a right that every American should be able to take pride in having. Guns are used for self-defence, resistance, hunting, and law enforcement and also it has its other uses too.

To combat that, many students have taken to a strike from school, protesting the current gun laws; their efforts aim them in the direction of changing the dynamic of the United States. In their home state, the victims of the Marjory shooting reformed the guns laws. The specific manner in which the gun laws were changed can be seen

Gina Aine Cathy Jones English 1A, 48354 March 16, 2016 English 1A: Essay #2 Critical Reading Analysis Introduction: Those school shootings have headed numerous individuals should ask the reason why they do it? On 2015 alone, there been more school shootings over America. Gun savagery may be during a record-breaking secondary. This need brought on a lot of people issues around students, families, employees of their schools, what 's more, inhabitants of the territories.

The state government wanted to assure its citizens that they would be protected should they be forced to use deadly force against a looter or attacker (Fair). It was without a doubt, a simple and reasonable expansion of the already existing self-defense laws in place. It is universally regarded as common law that a person may kill their attacker if they do so in the defense of their own life. To many natural law philosophers, the right to self-defense is regarded as a moral imperative (Fair). The intent and purpose of these laws is to allow law abiding citizens to defend themselves with lethal force without having to fear prosecution for their actions.

versus Heller was a landmark case that dealt with the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. The question asked by the court was whether or not the D.C. provisions that regulate firearms violate the Second Amendment? In a five to four decision made by the Supreme Court of the United States, it was affirmed that the Second Amendment, pertaining to federal enclaves, safeguards a person’s right to own a firearm for “traditional lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home” (Syllabus). This marked the first case by the Supreme Court that determined Second Amendment rights for individuals to keep and bear

The nation in return rose to action and changed to insure safety across America. The Sandy Hook Massacre affected the US tremendously, creating awareness, more school security, and a new effective lockdown procedure at schools. Nearly immediately after news broke out of the shooting, people asked how a man who was so sick in the head could get a hold of so powerful of a rifle. The nation however had no answer. Gun laws had been in question before, but now after the funerals of 20 children the United States had to change.

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (McClain and Tauber, 516). Controversy has aroused because of the interpretation of this amendment. In a modern society, the meaning of “Militia” is “a group of people who are not part of the armed forces of a country but are trained like soldiers” (“Militia”, Merriam-Webster). As a matter of fact, the debate on gun control was settled in 1791, that is over 200 years ago and a lot has changed since then. During that time, civilians were obligated to participate if their state was on battle, it was necessary for individuals to bear guns at home.