Go Vegan Analysis
Is veganism a lifestyle change that is worth making? What should a person’s reasons be for going vegan? What impact does veganism have? These are the questions that both Gary Steiner and George Wang want to answer in their respective articles “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable,” and “Go Vegan, Save the Planet.” But, the answers they come up with are very different. Steiner is a strict “ethical” vegan who believes that veganism is necessary because using animals for human consumption is morally wrong, while Wang argues that veganism is a transaction that could save the planet from its current fate. So, who is right, or is there really a definite answer? First, Gary Steiner offers an emotion-based, tug at your heartstrings perspective on why we should become vegan. His main claim (of policy) is that we should become vegans because it is inhumane to kill animals for human needs. He supports his cause by refuting two counterarguments from those who ask if animal suffering is comparable to human suffering: those who believe animals are not as important as humans because they are not in God’s image, and those who believe animals do not think as humans and so cannot suffer as …show more content…
Clearly then, their reasoning is entirely different, perhaps because of their audiences. Wang is writing for CNN, a news network that puts a lot of emphasis on climate change, especially in a political light. His audience is primarily educated, politically involved individuals that respond well to facts and figures. Steiner, on the other hand, is writing for the New York magazine, which is more targeted towards the “average American” who might respond better to emotional reasoning than to statistical facts. He is writing specifically for the Thanksgiving issue, to appeal to the families who put turkey on their plate for the holiday, to convince them to pass the tofu
An Analysis Of Against Meat By Jonathan Safran Foer
1009 Words | 5 PagesIntroduction In this article “Against Meat” (2009) Jonathan Safran Foer explains his experience from a young age until the present struggling whether being a vegetarian or an omnivore because he doesn’t want to hurt animals at the same time he can’t resist food because it tasted good. Jonathan Safran Foer is an American novelist (born February 21, 1977) He graduated from Princeton University with a degree in philosophy, in his freshman year he took a writing class from the novelist Joyce Carol.
The Carnivore's Dilemma By Nicolette Hahn Niman
699 Words | 3 PagesIs eating meat a detrimental threat to the environment? This debate over meat’s involvement in the global warming crisis was what inspired Nicolette Hahn Niman to write, “The Carnivore’s Dilemma.” Niman hoped writing, “The Carnivore’s Dilemma,” would cause her audience to understand that eating meat, raised on traditional farms, was a superior alternative to vegetarianism. Niman supported her claim by explaining how industrialized farms and vegetarians produce more of the three greenhouse gases that caused global warming, than that produced by traditional farms. Niman’s article fell short of being effective due to flaws in her supporting evidence and conclusion.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Gary Steiner's Animal, Vegetable Mineral
755 Words | 4 PagesBegin by reading about Rhetorical Analysis (41-54). Then, read Gary Steiner 's "Animal, Vegetable, Mineral" (769-773) and write three paragraphs. This will be your first online activity. Give it your best attempt. Help me help you.
Analysis Of Laura Fraser's Essay Why I Stopped Being A Vegetarian
978 Words | 4 PagesThe Impact of Humor As Leo Rosten, an American humorist and author states, “Humor is the affectionate communication of insight” Humor is an intelligent way to enforce an argument to your audience. With the employment of humor, the authors are able to persuade their readers into understanding, and sometimes agreeing with their opinions. Humor allows authors to have the insight about their topic thus, giving the author credibility and zealousness. In Laura Fraser's essay, “Why I Stopped Being a Vegetarian”, she employs the element of humor to strengthen her essay in a myriad of ways.
Conscientious Meat Eater Analysis
796 Words | 4 PagesIn the article, “Is It Possible to be a Conscientious Meat Eater”, the authors argue that processed meat can greatly affect the many things in our everyday life. Sunaura and Alexander’s argument is significantly unreliable because of the certain professions both authors yield. As stated in the article “Sunaura is an artist, writer, and activist in Oakland.” “Alexander’s profession is studying philosophy, and ethics in Athens, Georgia.” This shows that neither of them are qualified to argue in the subject of conscientious meat eaters.
Cowspiracy: The Sustainability Secret
678 Words | 3 PagesHow even-handed is it to interview vegans about eating meat? Not so much! Moreover, the filmmakers also create hasty generalization in their movie. They jump to the conclusion that “animal agriculture is the leading cause of species extinction, ocean dead zones, water pollution, and habitat destruction” (“Cowspiracy: The Sustainability Secret”) while they have too-limited evidence.
Alan Richmands Fork It Over: My Beef With Vegans
1931 Words | 8 PagesGrowing up with a pescetarian mother (eating no meat other than fish) and omnivore father has not been the easiest of tasks. My mother likes to think she is holier-than-thou because of her diet, while my father just sits and laughs in the corner while eating a stack of ribs. When I read Alan Richmands excerpt “Fork It Over: My Beef with Vegans” I identified with his experiences with vegans because they were what I had experienced with my pescetarian mother over the years. Despite non meat eaters trying to convert meat eaters through persistent ranting, describing in great detail how the animals are raised and slaughtered (guilt tripping), and by trying to demonstrate that food made without animal products can taste just as good as those made with animal products a person can still make the decision to eat meat and enjoy it.
Summary Of Escape From The Western Diet
1739 Words | 7 PagesAs diets and health become more and more of a public concern in America. Two authors weigh in on their opinions on how the American public should handle the problem of obesity as well as their solutions to the overwhelming issue. In one article, “Against Meat,” published on the New York Times website in 2009, points out that the solution to obesity should be vegetarianism. Johnathan Foer who is a vegetarian, claims that his diet and way of living is his the way of improving health in the American public. Foer’s article provides a sense of humor as well as personal stories to attempt to persuade his audience for the ethical treatment of animals along with his personal solution for his own health and the health of his family.
Garretson's Argumentative Analysis
528 Words | 3 PagesFinally, the quality of counterargument expressed throughout Garretson’s essay, has also been effected by her biased stance on vegetarianism, because she has been unable to display and acknowledge opposing views in her piece. It is very important for one to present counterarguments in their writing because it shows that the writer is not narrow-minded, and instead, is fair by considering other perspectives. Additionally, the use of counterargument adds credibility to a writing and makes the arguments that one presents more believable and trustworthy. Since Garretson does not display or acknowledge any opposing views in her essay, her arguments lose a great deal of credibility. There are many different approaches that Garretson could have taken
Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Is Hunting Moral?'
813 Words | 4 PagesWhile returning to his first arguments about how critics often argue that hunting is immoral because it requires intentionally inflicting harm on innocent creatures. Even people who are not comfortable should acknowledge that many animals have the capacity to suffer. If it is wrong to inflict unwanted pain or death on an animal, then it is wrong to hunt. Today it is hard to argue that human hunting is strictly necessary in the same way that hunting is necessary for animals. The objection from necessary harm holds that hunting is morally permissible only if it is necessary for the hunter’s survival.
Eating Meat Is Ethical Essay
768 Words | 4 PagesIn today’s world, there is a division among the people in the world regarding whether or not it is ethical to eat meat. After researching about eating meat and vegetarianism, I have come to the conclusion that it is indeed ethical to eat meat in today’s society. Sure, eating meat might have its drawbacks, but I have found that the benefits of eating meat far outweigh the negatives of eating it. Eating meat not only helps improve people’s health, but it also helps strengthen our economy and it has little difference in the environmental impact that involves in the farming of vegetables. Eating too much of anything usually results in a negative outcome.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Graham Hill's Speech On TED Talk
628 Words | 3 Pages“I asked myself a question: "Knowing what I know, why am I not a vegetarian?"’ Graham Hill, an inspiring speaker, introduced a new way to eat. During his speech on TED Talk, he explains to his audience how eating meat has affected the world. In a calm and humorous tone, Hill proposes his purpose. He explains to his audience by becoming a “weekday veg” you will live a better live, it’s great compromise that will help people, animals, and the environment.
Persuasive Speech On Veganism
1103 Words | 5 PagesBut if you love and want to help animals, it really does benefit being vegan. There is no difference between a cow and a dog. The only difference is your perspective. Your egg carton or mayonnaise jar may tell you that they came from “free-range chickens”. Your meat supplying grocery store may tell you that the flesh of the animal you are eating
Persuasive Essay On Climate Change
734 Words | 3 PagesVeganism is a foolproof method to provide the answers the Earth needs, especially as the world’s population continues its inefficient and environmentally damaging methods of energy usage. People tend to focus on the political sides of climate change, however, the biggest problem the world faces in energy consumption is not transportation emissions but is how we go about out food systems and daily food choices. Evidence has surfaced about how daily food choices impact the climate severely. According to an assessment by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the livestock sector of global greenhouse gases surpassed that of transportation.
Essay On Veganism
1401 Words | 6 PagesToday the modern American is not vegan, but what is commonly known as a “meat-eater,” or more specifically an omnivore. It is widely known that eating meat comes with various positive and negative attributions. Though for non meat-eaters, where does their health state stand? Becoming vegan for one's health,
More about Go Vegan Analysis
An Analysis Of Against Meat By Jonathan Safran Foer
1009 Words | 5 PagesThe Carnivore's Dilemma By Nicolette Hahn Niman
699 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Gary Steiner's Animal, Vegetable Mineral
755 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of Laura Fraser's Essay Why I Stopped Being A Vegetarian
978 Words | 4 PagesConscientious Meat Eater Analysis
796 Words | 4 PagesCowspiracy: The Sustainability Secret
678 Words | 3 PagesAlan Richmands Fork It Over: My Beef With Vegans
1931 Words | 8 PagesSummary Of Escape From The Western Diet
1739 Words | 7 PagesGarretson's Argumentative Analysis
528 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of 'Is Hunting Moral?'
813 Words | 4 PagesEating Meat Is Ethical Essay
768 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Graham Hill's Speech On TED Talk
628 Words | 3 PagesPersuasive Speech On Veganism
1103 Words | 5 PagesPersuasive Essay On Climate Change
734 Words | 3 PagesEssay On Veganism
1401 Words | 6 Pages