From firsthand experience, I can voice that wearing a seat belt will save a driver or passenger’s life in a vulnerable moment. Why wouldn’t drivers or passengers want to wear something that could save their lives? Why wouldn’t drivers or passengers want to wear something that would save their family and loved one’s from heartache? Why wouldn’t drivers or passengers want to wear something that was quick to put on and specifically made to keep them safe? Not wearing a seat belt should be illegal in all 50 states because it is not a healthy habit to attain, it can easily be prevented, and it puts safety at risk.
Minimum Driving Age The controversy of raising or maintaining the minimum driving age has been an ongoing feud. More recently, studies have emerged supporting the idea of the minimum age being too low, contributing to the high mortality rate of teenagers due to car crashes. The opposing side of this argument believes addressing other areas of issue with teenage drivers is a better option than raising the minimum driving age. They are in favor of keeping the minimum driving age the same, suggesting parental involvement and stricter guidelines play a larger role. I am in favor of raising the minimum driving age because it will lower financial burdens, lower car crash rates, and allow more time for teenage brains to develop and mature.
Although there was a decrease of almost 15% in crashes involving motorcycles, the fatality rate among motorcyclists remains a cause for concern. So, one thing is for sure-motorcycle safety awareness has to be turned into a year round initiative, instead of limiting it to just the month of May. Motorcyclists are at a distinct disadvantage when on the road; they have smaller vehicles with lower stability and are more vulnerable to road conditions and inclement weather. To compound their
A stronger focus on gun control in the United States involving restriction or even an outright ban of guns could serve to help the problem greatly. In 2015, 13,286 people were killed by firearms in the United States, with 26,819 suffering from non-lethal injuries (qtd. in “Guns in the US”). Taking away guns, the means that many urban criminals have to commit their crimes, would be very beneficial to cities. Recent studies found that the most effective way of reducing gun crime is to lower the amount of guns available in circulation.
The matter is very serious and impacting the lives of many athletes around the world. Concussions are nothing to take lightly, brain damage not only sidelines you from the game, but may also sideline you from specific activities, or daily tasks. Researchers are examining equipment in order to find out whether or not they are eligible to design a high quality helmet in order to protect the head from a high speed impact. The more force that the helmet can absorb, the less impact the brain will withstand when the hit is given
There have been so many gun incidents in the this world ours , we still don’t have a type of law for gun control policies, and there should be. There are about 100,000 Americans killed each year by guns. If the Congress could just lay some type of control on guns right now, we can save many lives from being in danger, stop all the school shootings, and have a better, more safe life. Gun policies can help lower crime rate and stop children and irresponsible adults from getting guns. Having a gun control laws can help save more lives in this world and stop having families suffer in pain because a mental man had killed a member that belongs to their family.
This is very unusual, as guns in America are used to protect people, but these guns are more commonly used to kill other people. This happens in real life because the Las Vegas shooting killed almost half of ten thousand people were injured or killed. The main evidence here that proves my point, is “A background check did not stop this killer, but tighter background checks can keep war weapons out of the hands of those who are known to be mentally unstable.” This helps me prove my point because the killer would not have obtained a gun if stricter background checks occured. Without a gun, the killer become weak, and unable to kill people. This would make us much safer if killers don’t have access to guns.
So that 24% could cause deaths, crashes and injuries. All those updates and advances in aren’t in everyone’s budget and not everyone can get them or has them so suing your phone isn’t worth taking all those risks. As you now know distracted driving is a very big risk to take. Distracted driving is dangerous and leads to many deaths and all those laws are there to protect you but people just don’t follow them also all those types of distraction are equally as dangerous as just texting while driving. This topic is very controversial because not everyone agrees but all those risks you take while driving can be avoided and not using your phone while driving can save lives.
There are more than 7 billion mobile subscriptions worldwide according to the International Telecommunications Union. The highway traffic safety administration says that as of December 2012 171.3 billion text messages were sent in the U.S. and surrounding territories every month. In 2012, 3,328 people were killed and 421,000 were injured in accidents involving a distracted driver (Kilcarr). There are eight states that have been banned for the use of handheld communication devices while driving. Police thinks it is right to ban texting while driving because it will cause less accidents on the highways and less motorist accidents as well.
However, after the ban expired over 300 people were killed in a mass shooting from 2004 to 2014. I think that this ban was actually very helpful since it did reduce fewer deaths in mass shootings and made it harder to buy “more dangerous” gun and carry only 10
It doesn’t take much force to break a bone, but a simple cut could lead to significant blood loss. Something as simple as buckling a seatbelt could have saved the person’s life. It takes just a couple seconds to buckle up, but some people view seatbelts as hindrances. Although, some people may say cars are safer than ever before, people are still dying in motor
There are weapons that are less deadlier than the gun but most kill you. I think a good replacement for lethal guns are taser guns, and the taser x26. These weapons cause the least deaths but they are still effective in self protection and stopping criminals. If taser guns replace the regular lethal weapons in law enforcement there will be less long term injuries and less casualties. If there are less deaths there will be less hate for the police and less lawsuits.
People are taught to learn from their mistakes but what do you learn from if there are none? If people are not getting in trouble and you are not getting any consequences for certain things then what is going to stop people from doing them. Littering and speeding is going to become more and more acceptable and the world is going to become dirtier and more people are going to get hurt or die from crashes. That is just two of the things just imagine if people did not have any of these minor offenses, our once beautiful nation might turn into complete anarchy. Secondly people need to not look at these as more of a warning.
Since the medical bills for the last month of life for those who die naturally is $10,118, this would add up to $627 million annually.” (Haney, "Economics of Assisted Suicide"). In chapter six of Beyond Bumper Sticker Ethics the chapter is called Utilitarianism which talks about the greatest good for the greatest number. If the price of physician assisted suicide is cheaper than having someone go through chemotherapy. From a Utilitarian stand point, a person in this situation can do a greater justice for the society by saving money and time, and should proceed with assisted
Some of the society needs to recognize in-state Manning fully that legally owning or selling guns only puts another life at risk.It will decrease the amount of mass crimes that are being committed in the United States.Studies have shown When the government outlawed something that huge, number of people very much want that outlawed item even more. This has been shown countless of times(Reed Fred,2).The endless debating conflicts in death caused by guns are why many states in order to The endless debating conflicts in death caused by guns are why many states in order to decrease the rate of violence should limit access to handguns.not only is it the government 's fault, but the people who ignore the symptoms of such mentally ill person. They also take part in not enforcing guns be in their loved one 's possession. A mentally ill man name Sergio Valen Cena Deltoro, was a veteran who served in