So that 24% could cause deaths, crashes and injuries. All those updates and advances in aren’t in everyone’s budget and not everyone can get them or has them so suing your phone isn’t worth taking all those risks. As you now know distracted driving is a very big risk to take. Distracted driving is dangerous and leads to many deaths and all those laws are there to protect you but people just don’t follow them also all those types of distraction are equally as dangerous as just texting while driving. This topic is very controversial because not everyone agrees but all those risks you take while driving can be avoided and not using your phone while driving can save lives.
Minimum Driving Age The controversy of raising or maintaining the minimum driving age has been an ongoing feud. More recently, studies have emerged supporting the idea of the minimum age being too low, contributing to the high mortality rate of teenagers due to car crashes. The opposing side of this argument believes addressing other areas of issue with teenage drivers is a better option than raising the minimum driving age. They are in favor of keeping the minimum driving age the same, suggesting parental involvement and stricter guidelines play a larger role. I am in favor of raising the minimum driving age because it will lower financial burdens, lower car crash rates, and allow more time for teenage brains to develop and mature.
I took that one to court and the judge threw it out. Same cop gave me a ticket for not having tail lights - after someone smashed into the back of my car and broke them. Judge threw that one out too.” Many people believe cops are constantly on a power trip and are trying to execute their authority regardless of the situation. It is not false to say that motorcycle cops undoubtedly have a very negative reputation, but why? Psychologically speaking, according to the theory of Negativity Bias, something very negative will generally have more of an impact on a person 's behavior and cognition than something equally emotional but positive.
I believe in speed limits and that everyone should follow them not only keep themselves safe but people on the road safe as well. I know for a fact that in Fiji the most deaths on the roads are from speeding accidents that could have been avoidable if people just followed the law and didn’t speed. People forget and don’t realize a lot of the time how their actions can affect everyone else on the road not only themselves. When a person is speeding they give themselves less time to react if something were to happen. For example, a person going at the legal speed limit would have more chance of being fine.
Donovan was probably a nice kid, but wasn’t wearing his seatbelt and now is make it tough on kids getting their license. Now people are think about raising the driving age to 18, but that won’t help. Raising the driving age just because of idiotic decisions made by teens. They should enforce the laws and making them stricter and safer. First of all, the real threat to the driver is the temptations and distractions that happen in the vehicle.
(Semicolon rule 1)For the past few years, America has been through countless demonstrations of violence; our wound is getting deeper and deeper. Many Americans blame loose gun laws as this problem, saying that it 's too easy to get your hands on a gun in today 's world. However, imposing stricter gun laws would only slow down the issue, not completely stop it.In more detail, it would be a fruitless attempt to solve rising violence in America. Mental health is at the root of this rising violence. Instead of focusing on imposing gun laws, America needs to focus on improving mental health in order to stop the rising violence.
According to Penmesta and Pulugurtha, violating traffic laws can result in serious injury and even fatalities between motorist in the United States. While people are affected by speeding motorist daily, other factors, such as drugs and alcohol, are two times more likely to cause more severe accidents as opposed by a sober person. My issue is excessive speeds have been the factor in deaths across the country. In their article, their research has pointed out that people that have broken the traffic laws has resulted in crashes and fatalities, but we also need a retraining program to achieve zero traffic deaths. The second article, A new approach for assessing and training drivers’ speed management, supports the finding by Penmasta and Pulugurtha.
The most compelling ideas in Kate Willette’s argument is the idea of other factors other than inexperience and age that contribute to teenagers getting into car accidents. Raising the driving age may simply put teenagers at a higher risk because they would be lacking more experience and the other factors would still exist as problems. Given that the writer blames the driver’s education system for it’s outdated lessons, Willette believes that teenagers do, in fact, have the ability to take on the responsibility of driving. Since she takes the sides of teenagers, Willette does not point her fingers at the teenagers, but rather at the system because of the lack of providing proper training. The writer utilizes the effect of ethos when convincing
The story above is a prime example of how drunk driving can tear families apart, or possibly injured an innocent person. Drunk driving is a selfish act because it hurts people who don’t deserve the pain of drunk driving. Also the drunk driver will live with the guilt of hurting other people, a day won’t go by where they don't think about it. Reading this article will open your eyes to the serious problem of Driving under the influence, also the miserable impacts it has on people today.People Should not drink and drive because it can tear innocent families apart by injuring innocent people, it also is very selfish act for one to do, and it will leave someone with a lot guilt that they will face each day. People should not drink and drive because it can tear innocent families apart, by injuring innocent people.
If always active and ready to trigger it makes it less likely that we will stop searching for new information. She also explains that when we are satisfied with what we have found that isn’t always enough because we will always want more than what we are currently satisfied with (pars. 5, 6). This process makes it very difficult to ignore social media, so when we receive a notification while driving we are just unable to ignore our phones because our brain has the dopamine system active. It’s much easier to put our phones on silent while driving so we won’t hear our notifications that instantly draws our eyes from the road to our
One reason is high risk at drinking, also known for high risks of accidents. My third opinion is because they go over the speed limit. Even though parents and others try to make their kids realize that they don’t need to drive, but they do anyway. The parents just want their kids safe so I wouldn’t mind them raising the age limit. First, although it may seem cruel to teens, raising the minimum driving age would allow drivers to become better prepared.
Maybe when talking on the phone you 're still able to watch the road, but your focus is on who is talking to and what they 're talking about. If an argument starts, becoming upset will only cause your driving to be worse. Hundreds of accidents are caused daily by talking on the phone. Driving while emotional isn 't a good idea to begin with and adding cell phone use to the mix makes it even worse. In conclusion using cell phones while driving should be illegal in all states.
By breaking this law and driving around without a license is a huge risk for them because when they get pulled over they have a high chance to get deported. Not only can the person not have a driver’s license, but because of this problem they can’t have insurance which will not help anybody because they will be worried about having an accident which won’t help anybody. In North Carolina there is a bill and is in talks about giving driver’s license to undocumented immigrants, but the governor does not approve of this bill. “Governor Pat McCrory also a Republican, sent his legislature liaison to the committee Tuesday to express his disapproval as well. He is opposed to this bill (Binker and Brown).