Argumentative Essay: The Future Of Social Security

putting the security of these civilians a risk, defeats the whole purpose of social security, which is why the privatization of Social Security would be foolish. A major risk of privatization is that the transition from a “pay as you go” system to a fully funded system would be very difficult to manage, for many reasons. Currently, the taxes paid by each generation of workers fund the retirement benefits of the previous generation of workers. While each generation of workers has been confident that its retirement would be financed by the next, this confidence is eroding (Pollard 1).

The other elements of legislation including age retirement, SSDI, SSI, Medicaid and Medicare help each individual for a continuous source of income and to improve their health. However, there are individual who will take advantage of these benefits and is causing damage on each program resource. Congress needs to address how to preserve the benefits for those who truly need them versus the ones who are capable of working to provide for their family. It is predicated by 2033, there will be 2.1 workers for each beneficiary. In order for Social Security to continue functioning the working population has to increase compared to the retired

The social security is a costing system and it occupies a big proportion in the government spending. In Barbara R. Bergmann’s article “Could Social Security Go Broke?,” she deems that there is enough fund in the social security system and the government can easily transfer the tax income from current employees and firms that employ these employees to the social security to support retirees’ lives. This point of view only can be considered as assumption, but not for the real world. After the finacial crisis in 2008, a large number of employees were laid off during that time and some employees decided to retire early, which results the labor force in American has shrunk. In the meantime, the presence of effective technology products,

How did it win acceptance? Beginning in 1939, workers could retired at age 65 and get a payment every month ranging from $10-$85 based on their contributions to the fund. They started paying an unemployment tax to provide benefits to workers who lost their jobs through no fault of their own. “Social Security squared with America 's historical individualism because it was neither structured as a welfare program nor sold to the public as such.

A country’s social security system is very important, as it directly relates to the happiness and wellbeing of its citizens. During this time period, Canada’s social security system advanced greatly, specifically with the Canadian Pension Plan and the Medical Care Act. Although an Old Age Pension Act was already introduced in 1927, this program only provided benefits for seniors who had an annual income that was less than $350. With the economic improvement following World War 2, seniors faced the problem of inflation because their pensions were tied to minimum income levels rather than the cost of living. In 1951, Louis St. Laurent fixed this issue by introducing the Old Age Security Act and Old Age Assistance Act, the first pensions that

Every time a baby is born in the U.S. they are given a social security number. This number will continue to be important until the day that they die. Young people often do not know the importance of Social Security except the fact that it is used often for identification purposes. In recent years there has been a lot of talk surrounding the Social Security system and the current crisis that it is facing. Of course there are many possible solutions to combat this crisis, but none without their faults.

The SSA, as well as many other programs under the New Deal, are still around today, helping to keep people of all occupations, on their

Did he ever wonder what would happen if the program paid out more than it brought in? The system beginning to default today, and it will most certainly have economic and social ramifications. The idea of social security today has also shown the people’s dependence on the American government, and it has developed into the fallacy that social security is a retirement investment fund: it most certainly is not. FDR’s original concept of Social Security was not that it would serve as a replacement to savings but as additional allowance. But today, because of the nature of the program, people view Social Security as a bank with unlimited funds to which they are entitled to.

After reading about the Social Security, I learned that it is not as reliable as every person thoughts it would be. There are constantly adjusting the terms and conditions for the Social Security. So by the time I am retired, I might not be eligible or receive as much income as I should. The other two options are the private pension, which is not for every worker, and personal savings. Even though we do not make additional income from our personal savings, it should be more reliable than the first two choices if I carefully manage and planned out the budgets.

Privatization of such a major piece of our government may seem like the waving of a white flag to some, but it is a solution that both sides of the political spectrum have supported in the past. Privatizing the system appeals to both parties, not just those who support libertarian policies and generally lean to the right of the political spectrum. President Clinton passed the “FAIR Act of 1988” which required all government agencies to declare whether their position as a government entity was crucial to their success, and he was also in favor of privatizing Social Security, as he could see the necessity for shifting to private organizations (Jacobson). Many leftist Democrats see Bill Clinton as a political role model, so his acceptance and support of privatizing certain governmental agencies proves that left- leaning politicians might not meet this idea with as much opposition as originally thought. Privatization also brings the benefit of competition, which would act as a safety net in avoiding an ineffective system like the one seen in the status quo.

Christopher, Greed was differently the driving factor of the imbalance between the wealthy and the common people. Social Security definitely did help the economy. When those of age 65 and over would retire, it would lead to job positions opening up, which led to new people being hired. It wasn’t really new demand, as younger people would replace the older ones. When people would receive their pension check it wasn’t very much.

This is portrayed through the ways social security shifted burdens from the family to the

until the passage of the Social Security Act of 1935 which is what I will discuss next (Pimpare, 2007, pp. 237). Social Security Act of 1935 The Social Security Act of 1935 is sometimes identified as the birth of the American welfare state (Pimpare, 2007, pp.237). The Social Security Act of 1935 provided for unemployment insurance, old-age insurance, and welfare programs (Martin & Weaver, 2005, pp.1). The welfare part of the Social Security Act of 1935 provided programs that included Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) which has been transformed into the current program of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) (Martin & Weaver, 2005, pp.2).

Bernstein’s account of social security is more accurate, because of the fact that only 80 percent benefited from the social security programs. Those included, unemployment insurance, benefits for children, such as medical assistance needed, and Retire benefits. Bernstein “exaggerates” for the good things that he will do in the United States, and the people are leaving out. Those included farm workers, domestic help and sharecroppers. The programs like the social security didn’t really benefit the people and the new deal was not looking so great.

The act was created after the public burst out about the lack of insurance for older aged individuals. It was an incredibly historical act and was seen as incredible patriotic. In a historical flyer dated back to 1935 found in the Print and Photograph Division fo the Library of Congress, the words, "A monthly check to you - for the rest of your life...beginning when you are 65" are displayed prominently. On the flyer is a large abundance of information regarding Social Security including what it is, where to get it and who can get it. On the flyer is a man giving out "your monthly Social Security check" to the viewer.