Criminals will always find ways to get guns and banning handguns will certainly not stop them. John Stossel does make a good point when he states that having laws against guns is also restricting self defense on people. Taking away the ability to buy handguns leaves citizens with less self-defense options. This raises a much bigger and serious problem, leaving people vulnerable by taking away their right to self defense and Stossel (2008) is correct to say that gun bans preventing citizens from using guns in self-defense, and giving criminals a much bigger advantage. It is naive to think that banning handguns will keep a criminal from breaking the law.
It is a decision just as when someone decides to take a glance at their phone. In both decisions, one is choosing to put another’s right to life at risk. While drunk driving, a person is unaware of their surroundings, they are slightly out of control and vulnerable to making mistakes. While distracting driving, a person is also unaware of their surroundings, their attention is focused on something else and not the road, which also make a person vulnerable to making
Driving distracted has been considered by many as the same as driving while intoxicated. Driving while distracted should be addressed is as serious as driving while intoxicated. If there are laws on driving while intoxicated, there should also be laws and regulations on distracted driving. Law makers and police should enforce this health hazard because it could save many lives. Technology should not try to introduce a new solution to this issue, but rather simplify the issue.
Gun control is a heavily debated topic that many people stand for and against. Gun control has many different backgrounds as well. With gun control there will be less mass shootings like the 2016 shooting in Orlando and the 2017 shooting in Las Vegas (“Gun”). Gun Control laws will help prevent this because it will help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and any other type of released terrorist the best it can.To understand gun control more, it is important to know about the laws passed, pros, and cons. Although there are many different topics that are important to Gun Control, some may believe that the most important is about the laws of Gun Control.
A possible concern is that concealed firearms will make criminals more likely to commit more crimes. This is true and it may cause more crimes. Adults may be tempted to use their firearms in the wrong way. In spite of this, it’s important to remember that carrying a concealed handgun can help stop a public shooting spree. Maybe those adults who are tempted to use their firearm unlawfully will start a shooting spree, but those who are responsible will help stop that from happening.
They think that because they are not driving far or because they are not driving fast, that it’s fine if they do not wear a seat belt. When in reality, people can get into a wreck anywhere. Teenagers tend to not wear their seat belts. Maybe they think that it’s not cool, or that they are too young to die and
What happens when that “first time offender” , loses their sense of knowledge of how to drive a car. Swerves into the next lane and hits someone ? We need to crack down on the laws we have in place now, to do that we need zero tolerance from offenders under the influence . Affect harsher penalties, to send the message drunk driving is not ok. Lastly Get rid of the petty laws that let offenders off the hook and enforce the law we have now. Officials need to crack down more on sobriety check-ins, vehicle ignition –interlocks, and arrest and detainment of first time offenders.
According to the article “Driving while impaired-Alcohol and drugs” (2015) The driver of the vehicle uses their hands and eye coordination so they need that to pay attention to the road before they cause a bad accident. Alcohol could get ahold of that and make it difficult for the driver to concentrate. In the same article it says that Alcohol slows down the functions of the
1. Give an example of a mala prohibita crime and describe why it is mala prohibita. An example of a mala prohibita crime would be driving over the speed limit. When people do this they are breaking the law, but they are not doing it in a malicious way; they are not trying to be bad. They just want to get somewhere quicker and don’t think speeding would be such a bad thing.
Besides the articles about the new amendments for alcohol-fuelled violence, the media also focused on assaults that were occurring in Kings Cross, as well as defending businesses who would lose money from the law reform. As a result of the media, the issue of alcohol-fuelled violence has successfully spread everywhere, which has influenced the government to introduce and amend many laws, strongly reducing alcohol-fuelled assaults in
First, although it may seem cruel to teens, raising the minimum driving age would allow drivers to become better prepared. Drinking is the major problem why teens are in car accidents almost every day. They go to parties, get drunk,
A law banning drivers using their cellphone while operating a vehicle would make the driver and the passengers inside the car safe too. Drivers that use their devices while driving are very dangerous to others too. One driver being careless can endanger other drivers on the road or pedestrians on the street. Good drivers that have full attention on driving and not their devices could be a part of the accident which involves a driver who wasn 't. Also in neighborhoods and places like that which have kids playing in the streets or people walking, a car crash could fatal for them.
Studies done after the sandy hook shooting have found that, “ Contrary to pro-gun lobby claims, research into prevention of gun violence has shown that reasonable reforms could reduce the excessively high rates of firearm deaths in the US while preserving access firearms, possession is not illegal for people proposed do not infringe on law abiding citizens ',” (Vittes 6). This has two main point to it, the first and most clearly is that it is irrelevant on what one 's believes might be, reasonable gun control will save Americans lives. The more subtle meaning behind this study was that gun lobby 's push the agenda that their companies are protected by right. The gun manufacturing business is no small group of occupations. They receive money by having customers purchases firearms, which they donate to political parties to pass different legislation.
I also believe, that a mix of the way California and Tucson handle underage drinking seems to be more successful tactics than others states mentioned. In this article, there was a lot of talk about deaths that occurred while under the influence. I believe this was a good way to write this article to really try to convince people that drinking is very dangerous for teenagers. If this article did not have so many