There is a debate between different sources on whether or not students should be getting paid for good grades. The issue is that people are being influenced by others who all agree with the claim that students should be getting paid for good grades. Although there are many claims as to why students should not be paid for good grades. One being that students should simply want to learn for themselves and their own growth. Another reason is that children would be working for money, not education when it should be the other way around to later on in life get good money and a good job.
There are many people out there that completely disagree with the Act or even the idea of fixing the crisis itself. people are saying that forgiving students from their debt would make them irresponsible with the extra money they’ll be making The fact of the matter is that if the Act were to pass, it would: eliminate many of the awful consequences of educational indebtedness. In doing so, it would give Americans greater purchasing power, helping to jumpstart the economy and create jobs. Of course, it does have some restrictions, but it will help the student loan debt crisis and the national debt crisis. The solution is that students will continue to pay their debt flexibly comfortably by paying ten percent of their income, and after twenty years of paying, the debts can be forgiven.
Accordingly, paying students for good grades lower self-esteem when they don’t succeed in what they desire to succeed in. When considering the choice of paying children for good grades to not paying kids, the choice should definitely be to not pay kids for good grades. Nevertheless, kids have lower academic performances, and rewards are given when the student actually deserves it. The students that want to obtain rewards is different from students who know they will earn the honors. Students shouldn’t obtain money for good grades, as in the long run, it will influence
Elizabeth Kenefick explains that “low-income students must increasingly rely on work (and loans) to meet the high costs of college . . . the jobs they take are not in their field of study, which can impair the potential for career exploration and improved employment outcomes in the future” (1). Work-study programs do not always align with a student’s career goals, but it teaches the student responsibility of simultaneously maintaining a job and an education.
It is different than just looking at the micro level because the reasons for the dropout rate do not just apply to one person or family, but a larger audience. One reason for the high college dropout rate could be high schools are not preparing students properly. At the high school level, students are not treated the same as they are in college. The course work can be easier, teachers do not give their students as much freedom, and there are much longer hours in class. All of these aspects sound good for the high school level, however, they can be the polar opposites of how students are treated in college.
Morals are significant because without morals a person will not just pick up cultivated behavior from parents, they will pick up behaviors incorporated from themselves. An exemplification of this would be two people, where one person is less fortunate, parents have low-paying jobs ,and is struggling to take care of themselves. On the other hand, one person has everything, parents have money , and they want for nothing in the world. The working family child is a straight A student, plays sports, and has dreams to be a doctor. Whereas, the rich child plans to mooch off their parents, don’t go to college, and don’t get good grades in school.
Not to mention the donor would be taking a valuable gift from the child, this will also lead to practical problems in the classroom, and think what were to happen if the money stopped coming in? Kids should not be paid for good grades because the donor would be taking a special gift from children, can lead to practical problems, and what if the money stopped coming in? One reason paying students for good grades is a bad idea is because the giver would be taking a gift from children. Your probably thinking “what do you mean?” Kids are naturally gifted to want to learn without money as motivation. The source would Edward Deci
The primary objective of education regards learning. Furthermore, parents invest a lot of capital to ensure that the students is being kept equipped with a quality education. Also, the scholarships present a challenge to both the students and the school faculties in that both parties have a feeling of entitlement and also reprimand fears regarding the value of the investment on the students (Johnson). Grade inflation means that the education system becomes less rigorous thus lessening the effectiveness of training in the higher institutions. The reduction of efficiency in the universities negatively impacts on the college diploma by reducing its worth.
Most people in the world thinks that a degree is required almost everywhere. In today’s society it is often thought if you don’t go to college you won’t succeed. In Owen and Sawhill’s article “Should Everyone Go To College?” responds to people that either go to college and actually earn a degree or people who do not go to college and are actually saving money. Most reason that college is not always the idea for a student and their families is the cost. “The cost of college matters as well: the more someone has to pay to attend, the lower the net benefit of attending.” (Owen and Sawhill, 2013, p. 2 ) Although the authors mention the benefits of attending college, they argue that college is only beneficial under certain circumstances.
Interviewers look at how far the people have gotten with their education and to see if they are qualified to work for them and if you only have a high school diploma and not having a degree they will most likely not hire you and go with someone who does have one. The parents do not realize that if they let their child got to college that it will help their family for the better since when their child does get a degree they would be qualified to find a well paying job. While thinking about class, culture, and family, you also tend to think about where their family came from and who were they raised by, how were they raised. We judged each other on our appearance, our hometown, and our social class. If you come from a high class family we think they are snobs, if you came from a bad city we quickly
Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.
Also it would teach them how to manage money and how to become a responsible adult. With so many players getting so little out of their college experience, it would be nice for even just a few players to learn some of life’s important lessons. These student athletes need to learn as much about managing money as they possibly can before some of them make it to the pro’s and start earning a great amount of money more than they 're used to. It would also put some in the situation of financial stakes becoming high. When players get suspended from a game, what does that really teach them?
Delbanco explains how students have changed their reasons for attending a college when he states, “...yet on the assumption that immersing themselves in learning for the sheer joy of it, with the aim of deepening their understanding of culture, nature, and, ultimately, themselves, is a vain indulgence” (222). Secondary education has become too expensive for learning to be an indulgence. Students only go to college to get a degree in order to gain a high paying career. Davidson explains how dire the situation with low paying job is by saying how the process should work, “Only through productivity growth can the average quality of human life improve” (339). Unfortunately, the productivity growth only leaves a bigger pay gap.
If it was free, people wouldn’t worry about paying, students would work harder to get accepted into big schools, and it would give people in a lower class have more opportunities. The first reason college should be free is, that people won’t worry about paying when they’re not given a scholarship. There are several people who don’t even go to college and end up starting up their own businesses because they know what they’d go through and they couldn’t pay. They
A person may apply for a student loan, financial aid, scholarships, etc(Alternatives). Although there is an abundant amount of options, not everyone may be qualified to receive one of these options. Therefore, they will not be able to attend college, making it hard for them to find a job that pays enough for one to take care of their family. It is coherent that colleges need money to pay for the essentials and the dorms. They also need money to pay the professors for working for them but, making someone pay for their education is not the way to do it.