Argumentative Essay: The United States Should End Plan Columbia
The United States should end Plan Columbia
Pro side: DeLashmutt-Bencomo wanted to end plan Columbia because of their main claim that the United States foreign policy main goal is to improve human right. They are no signs that plan Columbia is protecting people from human right violations. Since plan Columbia has been in place over eight hundred thousand people have reported to be victims of violence like rape and assault. Plan Columbia has also funded the Columbian military billions of dollars for weapons. These weapons have caused hundreds of extrajudicial civilian killings. The consumption and buying of illegal drugs has also gone up. We should remove this plan because it has not improved human rights or the narcotics war.
Con side: Kandan
…show more content…
Data: Since plan Columbia has been in place over eight hundred thousand people have reported to be victims of violence like rape and assault.
Warrant: human rights are the main purpose for plan Columbia.
Backing: the military carried out hundreds of judicial civilian killings.
Con side
Claim: United States Foreign policy has improved individual’s human rights in the country of Columbia.
Data: Violence and kidnapping has also gone down by 50%.
Warrant: less violence shows improvement in a country
Backing: Army sergeant John f said plan Columbia rescued Colombia from its failed state.
Each party has evidence and connective data in their argument.
The con side: Kansan – Gupta made more of a pragmatic argument. They made their argument more sensibly and realistically when they asked the other team if they considered murder to be a violation to human rights. The other team said no, then they responded back so would you rather your human right be violated or dead.
Pro side: DeLashmutt-Bencomo made more of argument from cause –effect reasoning. They stated multiple times how drug use has increase and the military is getting funded more money which is giving them the power to carryout more extrajudicial civilian
Big Stick Diplomacy Case Study
1309 Words | 6 Pages“Substituting dollars for bullets”, this policy wanted to prevent Latin American countries by managing the finances of “backward” countries and further American interest in East Asia through the use of economic might instead of military might. While it did manage to expand America’s sphere of influence through economic means, it was much less successful than Big Stick Diplomacy and Latin American countries saw the diplomacy as imperialist and some them even refused to sign treaties. Additionally it did not successfully counter economic instability and could not suppress the tide of revolution in Latin America. but failed to suppress or stop the Evidence. Examples and/or relevance • US installed a pro-American pro-dollar diplomacy regime in Honduras • Suppression of Nicaraguan revolution • Dollar diplomacy not restricted to Latin America – Taft forestalled annexation in Liberia, West Africa, but the diplomacy did not stop financial and political problems in Liberia • To curtail Japanese and Russian influence, was unable to get French or English support and settled for Chinese support
Theodore Roosevelt Corollary Essay
660 Words | 3 PagesIt was giving them access into Latin America, and into controlling and influencing the whole western hemisphere. As beneficial as this was to America, Latin America was in opposition. The Dominican Republic believed the Americas where “offending the republic’s dignity” when the U.S took over when they were in dept to European nations . Latin America had negative views to the corollary, they even openly presented them in their capitals’ newspaper. The “Listin Diario” never directly blamed the U.S but published articles that referenced the Good Neighbor policy and accused US officials of not following their own guidelines .
Cold War Dbq Essay
778 Words | 4 PagesSecretary of State George Marshall gave a speech explaining a plan for European recovery which known today as The Marshall Plan. It states that if the United States does not do whatever it takes to help restore normal economic health to the world, “there can be no political stability or peace.” (Document
Nothing But The Truth Justifiable Facts
780 Words | 4 PagesThe second reason was that the decision was justifiable. And the third reason was that everyone involved was aware of the process. These fact-based
Articles Of Confederation Persuasive Essay
990 Words | 4 PagesThe “search for a national government” in the United States came at a time when the country was at it’s lowest. We had finally declared our independence from Europe, but the country was lost. After our forefathers had written the Declaration of Independence, the country began creating governments, however the governments they began creating were on the state level. No one thought about creating the national government. When they did begin creating the national government, the people that formed the state’s governments thought to make the national government Republic.
Analysis: The Reagan Revolution
2176 Words | 9 PagesThe Trilateral Commission wanted to create a complex interdependency by working with other nations to establish human rights. Carter took steps to reduce arms and the sale of armaments so that the threat of nuclear warfare would be reduced. Thus creating freedom from the fear of communism. During the Cold War Cater called for a new Foreign policy , one based on the idea the United States could help shape a new world rooted in good values, morals and optimism. This can be seen in his commencement speech on human rights and foreign policy at Notre Dame University when he states “t is a new world, but America should not fear it.
Articles Of Confederation Dbq
234 Words | 1 PagesThe Articles of Confederation were ratified in 1781 and under these articles, the states remained sovereign, free, and independent. While each state has their freedom, Congress served as a last resort to appeal all disputes and differences that may arise between two or more states. In addition, Congress had the authority to make treaties and alliances, declare war, regulate money, appoint a committee, appoint military officers and manage affairs with the Indians. While it seems Congress had a fair share of powers, these articles caused problems due to a weak government.
Stolen Valor Act Pros And Cons
1757 Words | 8 PagesIn 2007, the respondent Xavier Alvarez attended a meeting as a board member in Claremont, California, where he introduced himself as the following: “I’m a retired marine of 25 years. I retired in the year 2001. Back in 1987, I was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor” (United States v Alvarez 1). In fact, Mr. Alvarez had never received said award, nor had he served in the United States Armed Forces. As a result of making said false statement, Alvarez was indicted under the Stolen Valor Act.
Was The USA Imperialist Power At The Beginning Of The Early 20th Century
977 Words | 4 PagesWhy and to what extent was the U.S. an imperialist power at the beginning of the 20th century? The 19th century was commonly known as the ‘Age of Imperialism’, during this time period the United States and a number of other major world powers began rapidly expanding their territory and influence, throughout the world. Many Americans supported the concept of imperialism due to the economic, military, and political influence that came with the annexation of fertile territories. Although this ideology seemed to benefit thriving imperialist powers such as Britain and France, the United States was only an imperialist power to the extent that they extended the U.S. power, but were an empire unsuccessful in controlling the nations under their rule.
John F. Kennedy's Foreign Policy
322 Words | 2 PagesIn Latin America, especially after Castro’s success in Cuba, Kennedy made the alliance for progress. The alliance for progress was an aid to the Latin American countries offered twenty billions dollar. The cause of the aid was to establish countries opposite the Soviet. This plan was to help the economy of Latin countries. However, it failed because the United States
Articles Of Confederation Argumentative Essay
640 Words | 3 PagesThe Articles of Confederation were written on November 15, 1777 when the, “Constitutional Congress met to try and come up with a framework or constitution for a new government,” as stated in the textbook Keeping the Republic by Barbour and Wright. The goal was to, “establish a ‘firm league of friendship among thirteen American states, but they did not empower a central government to act effectively on behalf of those states,” argued by Barbour and Wright, and they were not officially in effect until 1781. The Articles of Confederation started off as the first framework of government for the United States in 1781. It served as a stepping stone for the American government in order to create the Constitution. Replacing the Articles of Confederation
What You Eat Is Your Business Rhetorical Analysis
490 Words | 2 Pages(892) Zinczenko argues that America has failed to give a solution or better alternative, and because of that fact, has
Pros And Cons Of The Daubert Standard
1404 Words | 6 PagesMany people would argue about the essentiality of the death penalty in deterring crimes and others would
Argumentative Essay: The War In Iraq
840 Words | 4 PagesThe war in Iraq 20 March 2003 was the day everything changed, this was the day Americans stepped foot onto that foreign desert land that we now know of as Iraq. Many people have their own opinion about if the United States made the right decision deciding to go to war with this country. There are both positive and negative attributes that have come from us going to war. As stated before Americans are either for this decision or against. Personally, I am against us going to war due to: the lies and perception of Iraq 's weaponry, the amount of money that has been spent on the war, the amount of lives taken, and foremost the illegal actions that were taken to start the war with Iraq.
Foreign Aid Argumentative Essay
1035 Words | 5 Pagesin- hand with the idea of foreign aid keeping warlords in power; if the only way for aid to get to the citizens of a country is through it being given to the rulers, warlords will stay in
More about Argumentative Essay: The United States Should End Plan Columbia
Big Stick Diplomacy Case Study
1309 Words | 6 PagesTheodore Roosevelt Corollary Essay
660 Words | 3 PagesCold War Dbq Essay
778 Words | 4 PagesNothing But The Truth Justifiable Facts
780 Words | 4 PagesArticles Of Confederation Persuasive Essay
990 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis: The Reagan Revolution
2176 Words | 9 PagesArticles Of Confederation Dbq
234 Words | 1 PagesStolen Valor Act Pros And Cons
1757 Words | 8 PagesWas The USA Imperialist Power At The Beginning Of The Early 20th Century
977 Words | 4 PagesJohn F. Kennedy's Foreign Policy
322 Words | 2 PagesArticles Of Confederation Argumentative Essay
640 Words | 3 PagesWhat You Eat Is Your Business Rhetorical Analysis
490 Words | 2 PagesPros And Cons Of The Daubert Standard
1404 Words | 6 PagesArgumentative Essay: The War In Iraq
840 Words | 4 PagesForeign Aid Argumentative Essay
1035 Words | 5 Pages