Argumentative Essay: Why Artists Should Use Their Music In Advertising

Do you prefer to listen to music? Many of people do. The musicians sell their music and receive large sums of money. However, recently, there has been a large increase in popularity for music streaming services. To keep making money musicians have been required except endorsement deals from large corporations. Artists should use their music in advertising because they will be able to make larger sums of money in addition to gaining popularity.

A important reason artists should put their music in ads is because they will be able to make more money. According to Carter, data journalist David McCandless says that "a signed solo artist would need about 5,478 iTunes downloads of a song per month versus 4,200,000 YouTube streams per month just to make the U.S. minimum wage." This clearly shows that artists do not make enough money from just streaming music. As people move more toward music streaming, artists will continue to earn less money. The author Johnson says in paragraph 10, "The music business is just that—a business. It exists to make money, and artists need to make money in order to continue making music." Furthermore, if artists refuse to do endorsement deals, they will not be able to

Darrius Johnson, a author, says that well established artists can lose much from corporate deals. He supports this claim by talking about U2, a band that received large amounts of criticism and hate from fans about how they were forced to except music that they did not want to listen to. Even though this is a example of a corporate deal gone wrong, this is extremely rare and the benefits far outweigh the cons. Johnson also says in the same article, that artists need to make money in order to keep making music. If artists do not accept corporate deals, consequently, they will not be able to make