1634 people were killed in 2015 in 25 countries worldwide. And this due to the death penalty alone. And now Erdogan and the Turkish government are seriously thinking about reinstating the death penalty. He believes that this is necessary, to establish peace and order in Turkey, to prevent further politically motivated crimes, such as the Turkey Putsch and other Terror attacks. But the truth is, the death penalty brings more sorrow and pain than it will ever bring peace and protection. And here’s why:
The death penalty does not change the fact, that harm has been done and someone was hurt or murdered. It doesn’t bring a victim back to life and it doesn’t undo the pain that was caused. Even families that have lost someone are against the death penalty because it doesn’t make the pain of loss or hurt ever go away.
Many People believe the government when they say, that the death penalty is going to decrease the number of murders and crimes or acts of terror that happen in a country. But there is no proof of any sort that supports this statement. Too many people have been killed to decrease crime rates when there are statistics showing the opposite. Italy, for example, abolished the death penalty in 1994. The crime rate in 1993 was 2.3 per 100’000 people. And in 2010 it sank all the way to 0.8. So, the
…show more content…
This is one of many fundamental human rights, that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations, states. One of the objectives of the UN is to promote human rights, and as a founding member, who voted in favor of the declaration, Turkey should adhere to this. But by reinstating the death penalty Turkey would contradict this idea. It would be a direct violation of the most fundamental human rights. Furthermore, these rights are supposed to hinder and limit what a state can do to a person. By reinstating the death penalty, the value and the respect towards human life would be completely
The most essential argument against the death penalty is that it is immoral. Regardless of how you look at it, the death penalty is slaughtering, and murder is never right! A further take a gander at the profound quality of the death penalty is required, on the grounds that albeit homicide is considered an ethical total, this is not generally the situation. This can be discussed through the virtue ethics theory. Virtue Ethics is the main non-defective theory of morals and was established by Aristotle.
If the death penalty came more into effect now a days, there would be a lot less killing, homicides, murders, etc. Go back to the old days; eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. If you steal, one finger gets cut off. If the government would stop being terrified of hurting someone’s feelings in this society and bring back those actions, crime percentages would fall
The death penalty sends a message to citizens; a message that says murder is not outrageous, unless the state is doing it as a sanction. This message helps to justify civilian killings of people believed to be deserving of death and may possibly even cause an uprise in vigilante style murders. This message also leaves an almost open air on what is wrong and provides no consistent moral ground for society to base their beliefs on. This does not mean that people will suddenly think murder is a favorable deed, but it may cause some to not realize how terrible it is. Joseph Summer wrote this in an article titled “Some Adverse Effects of the Death Penalty in History”: “…people learned 3 lessons from the government’s violent example: to use
Yet, numerous research has shown that the death penalty has no effect on the deterrence of crime. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, murder rates have remained consistently higher in states with the death penalty than their neighboring non death penalty states. Another argument of advocates of the death penalty is that it prevents crime by putting fear of death in the minds of criminals. However, most crimes are committed in a heat of passion, therefore, criminals are mainly concerned about whether they will be caught, not what might happen to them afterwards. Since most murders are not recidivists, the death penalty does not work as a deterrent.
Capital Punishment is considered one of the most controversial sentences across the world and has been used as punishment for many centuries. However, as society has evolved the international community has found that it is a violation of human rights and hence created the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1976. Under Article 6.1 it states, “Every human being has the inherent right to life.” and under Article 6.2 it states, “In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law.”
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.
Abolishing the death penalty will save money and keep innocent people from dying. Conclusion Three strikes laws, the war on drugs, lack of rehabilitation programs and mandatory minimum sentences have caused the prison overcrowding problem in the United States. Furthermore, the death penalty is not a solution to crime and cost society. Rehabilitation is key to preventing prison overcrowding, preventing future crimes, and offenders becoming a successful citizen in
(Tucker). The practice of the death penalty reduces the number of criminal activities in society. Some of these criminal activities include murder, terrorism, and robbery. This is because criminals or potential criminals are afraid of dying. To give proof, here's some evidence…
The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible.
Although the death penalty may bring some closure to families of the victims and even the victims themselves it still should be abolished because the negatives outweigh the positives. People could be murdered by the state even if they are innocent. They are taking away any chance these people have at a normal life even though it's a life that they deserve and did nothing to have it taken away. 6. Conclusion
Annotated Bibliography Draft Student name : Haider Zafaryab Student number: 2360526 Thesis Statement : Capital Punishment is a very controversial topic around the globe. I believe that it does more harm than good and breeds violence in society. Source 1: Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996).
Another pressing issue associated with the death penalty is the morals behind it. It teaches society that if someone has done something wrong you could just murder
I will now introduce the fading of humanity. People suggest and would like that death penalty should still exist. They think about safety. They think about how they will feel safe if a murder is executed. They do not think that they vote for violation of the human rights.
The major reason why the death penalty should be abolished is that the cost of the death penalty is too much and the USA is in debt to many other countries. What this means is that the death penalty should be abolished and also the cost death penalty is more than the cost of maximum sentence life in prison. According to J. Marceau and H. Whitson, “The Cost of Colorado’s Death penalty,” 3 Univ. of Denver Criminal Law Review “A new study of the cost of the death penalty in Colorado revealed that capital proceedings require six times more days in court and
Death Penalty According to the 2010 Gallup Poll, 64% of the United State of America are supporting the death penalty, I as an American am part of that 36% that is against it. I do not believe that we as human being should determine whether another person should live or die. A second reason that I am against the death penalty is for the reason that the accused person could be innocent and normally the accused person only has one court presentation and is only judged by the judge not a jury of their peer, and is sent to death row where they pay for a crime that they haven’t done. My final reason that i do not believe that the death penalty should count as a punishment for the American people is because, a person that has done a massive massacre shouldn’t just be able to leave the world just like that without paying and suffering for what they have done, Or should the death punishment continue as it is for it has a great benefit to us as citizens of the United States.