Arguments Against Affirmative Action

1011 Words5 Pages
Affirmative action has become obsolete in today’s society. Affirmative action is an active effort to improve the employment or educational opportunities of members of minority groups and women; also: a similar effort to promote the rights or progress of other disadvantaged persons (Merriam-Webster, 2011). Today’s affirmative action will demoralize the very concepts that the policy was implemented to uphold: those of equality for all people regardless of color and discrimination. This policy supports racial multiplicity at the price of distinction, impartiality and experience; it also follows the line of reverse discrimination and sexual bias against white men (Reyna, Tucker, Korfmacher, & Henry, 2005). Individuals that advance on their…show more content…
The fear is that without this policy, diversity will not always happen if left up to chance. It is true that schools and other organizations have discriminated against women and people of other race. This problem created an unfair advantage for males of the superior race. Supporters also charge that without affirmative action African Americans would have a more difficult process of being admitted into prestigious and predominately white universities (Hopkins, 2010). Affirmative Action allows minorities to reflect different areas of study and work that otherwise would have never been considered. These allies also see Affirmative action as a way to compensate and repay minorities for the decades upon decades of slavery and oppression, two hundred forty-five years to be exact. Supporters place the argument that labels are made to identify cultural strengths or obstacles that and that minority status is a framework for the interpretation or determination of what constitutes achievement (Butler…show more content…
The Affirmative Action policy was intended to be “unique” to assist all disadvantaged groups with stress being on the importance of moral character (NOW, 2010 ). In actuality, the policy actively promotes reverse discrimination, as employers are required by law to hire and promote disadvantage persons regardless of attaining the qualification and credentials needed for the position. Employees are then ordered to train and allow the new hire to “shadow” them, just to find that the new hire will become their supervisor. This policy is also practiced in the United States military, as quotas are set for the promotion of minorities and women in an effort to endorse diversity (The White House, 1999). In reality the policy destroys the camaraderie and team building as unqualified individuals is advanced ahead of those with proven track records. In addition, College Admission boards are also required to screen applications based on quotas that has been established by the affirmative action policy in an effort to promote diversity (James, 2010). American college testing [ATC] and Scholastic Test [SAT] scores are used to forecast future freshman grades and is the basis for entrance into prominent universities. Despite low ACT and SAT scores, black students who are unprepared scholastically are admitted into universities only to later struggle academically (Kahlenberg, 1996). Does it matter if

More about Arguments Against Affirmative Action

Open Document