Arguments Against Alastair Norcross
Alastair Norcross takes the position in the animal rights argument that torturing animals for their use is unacceptable. He asks to consider a case where a man, Fred, lost his ability to enjoy chocolate because he lost the ability to produce Cocoamone. Fred’s doctor tells him that a recent study shows that, when puppies are tortured and then brutally killed, they produce cocoamone that Fred can then harvest. So Fred sets up his basement where he can torture puppies and then slaughter them in order to taste chocolate again. Norcross claims that this is obviously wrong and draws a correlation between Fred’s case and the situation where we cause chickens to suffer in order to mass produce their meat. Norcross claims that these two situations are comparable and that both are morally wrong. Some people might say that chocolate is not necessary to sustain human life whereas Norcross says that meat is not critical either. Vegans can survive without meat quite easily. Another objection to his argument is that one person will not have an effect on the production of meat. Norcross refers to this as the “Tragedy of commons.” Norcross compares this to voting and how one person could view that as one vote not making a difference in the election. Consider that no one …show more content…
The two are not arguments against each other, but simply two arguments on either side of the topic. Machan claims that animals do not have rights, but he also says that we should keep in mind that animals can feel pain and enjoyment and that we should consider that when we use them. He says that if we kill them we should do it humanely. Norcross claims that we should not be torturing animals for their use, but he does not specifically say that we cannot kill them. Both conclusions can be true because animals do not have to have rights to stop torturing them. Also, animals do not have to be tortured to use them regardless of their
Analysis Of Michael Pollan´s An Animal's Place
324 Words | 2 PagesIn An Animal’s Place, Michael Pollan describes the growing acknowledgement of animal rights, particularly America’s decision between vegetarianism and meat-eating. However, this growing sense of sentiment towards animals is coupled with a growing sense of brutality in farms and science labs. According to Pollan, the lacking respect for specific species of animals lies in the fact that they are absent from human’s everyday lives; enabling them to avoid acknowledgment of what they are doing when partaking in brutality towards animals. He presents arguments for why vegetarianism would make sense in certain instances and why it would not and ultimately lead to the decision of eating-meat while treating the animals fairly in the process. Pollan
Assess The Significance Of Norcross's Analogy
553 Words | 3 PagesPuppies are animals that are raised and loved by many people across the world. Of course, any dog owner would be sympathetic to the torturing of these puppies for gustatory pleasure. Farm animals are raised for the sole purpose of profit and value. Norcross’s argument does not have any validity, and therefore, does not contain enough evidence to support it.
Namit Arora On Eating Animals Analysis
704 Words | 3 PagesNamit Arora, author of the article “On Eating Animals”, harshly captures the inhumane production of meat in America with repulsive imagery and shocking details. Arora, writer at thehumanist.com, reveals the immediate attention that Americans give to their pets and news-famous animals like Molly a runaway cow, yet they neglect to realize the millions of livestock being killed daily. With an accusatory and critical tone Arora condemns the hypocrisy of those who are pro-life for animals, but they still consume meat products. In return, this clarifies the injustice towards these animals for his American readers and global viewers. Namit Arora’s devastating imagery underscores the brutality of American actions towards innocent animals with descriptions such as, “the cow, bellowing miserably and hobbling like a drunk for several seconds before collapsing” and, “...died on the street in a pool of blood.”
Norcross Argument Essay: Don T Eat Factory Farm Animals
654 Words | 3 PagesThe theory or idea that animal has rights comes from the rights that are traditionally moral and politically correct rights is a virtue from the type of culture that we are. Animal liberation comes from the utilitarian tradition that comes from ethics and mortality as coming about as a result of pleasure and/or pain, as someone’s overall well-being. When animals are caged harvest, this diminishes their well-being, which gives us the mortality that we address their decreased well-being and prescribes to us to liberate
Changing Our Outlook Of Animals During The Period Of 1800 To 1910
1293 Words | 6 Pages“The Cow and the Plow: Animal Suffering, Human Guilt, and the Crime of Cruelty.” Studies in Law, Politics and Society 36 (2005): 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1059-4337(05)36005-4. [5] Jones, Susan D. “Chapter 5 Pricing the Priceless Pet.” Essay. In Valuing Animals Veterinarians and Their Patients in Modern America, 120.
Frankie L Trull Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis
743 Words | 3 PagesSo the argument for animal tests dissolves. Furthermore, apparently the USA wastes more than 16 billion US dollars annually on animal testing. 16 billion dollars! If they invested this money on other projects such as welfare, this would save a lot of people without torturing
Norcross's Argument Analysis
538 Words | 3 PagesNorcross believe that one should not eat meat that is raised in a factory. He uses an argument about torturing puppies and eating their brains. Although his argument about Fred and his extreme cruelty to feel the sensation of eating chocolate is cruel, it puts one in a state of mind to pay close attention to his point. What is his point? Eating animals that are raised in factories are just is cruel as torturing puppies for one’s own pleasure.
Animal Cruelty In Factory Farms
1158 Words | 5 PagesOver the years the issues of animal cruelty in factory farms have become a major problem, because of the thriving meat industry. The issues regarding animal cruelty are important because it concerns fundamental moral and economic questions in respect to the way animals are treated, before being brutally slaughtered and later consumed by Americans daily. The topic of animal cruelty raises multiple differing arguments, many concerning religion or possibly a person's geological location in the world. By considering the arguments made by people who think animal cruelty to be morally acceptable, and researching the verified practices taking place on factory farms today, it will be clear that in the United States Animal cruelty is a cruel and unnecessary
Persuasive Speech Animal Testing
1084 Words | 5 PagesSince the value of animal life as a living being should be recognized and to a certain extent equated to the value of human life, the animal experiments raise a range of ethical questions (Armstrong & Botzler,
Rhetorical Strategies In Eating Animals By Jonathan Safran Foer
577 Words | 3 Pagesas an instance, Foer argues that if we agree with it is inaccurate to purpose pointless suffering to animals, we must not support an industry that is based on their exploitation. by way of appealing to our experience of right and wrong, Foer encourages readers to take a extra vital study their intake
Tracy Reiman Thesis
250 Words | 1 PagesTracy Reiman from the Tribune news service describes animal rights and cruelty during a time of racism in the United States. She explains events from the past to compare the similarities of how we have treated other people to how we treat animals today. Her persuasive method is very effective and kept me tuned in the whole time by using pathos in almost all of her examples. Reiman’s use of comparisons along with her explanations from different perspectives really make the reader think and feel a connection. This is why I strongly support Reiman’s claims on animal rights and treatments.
Francione's Argument Analysis
1001 Words | 5 PagesIn Debater Francione’s argument considering the Andre Robinson Case, A man who callously kicked a cat for laughs, Francione says that intentionally harming an animal is no different from killing an animal for eating purposes. And those that eat meat are practically the same as people who abuse animals on purpose. I disagree with Francione’s view. Eating meat does not make you an immoral person. Yes, Andre Robinson, the man in question, shouldn’t have kicked the cat like he did and he should not have shamelessly danced afterwards, but him kicking a cat is not the same as someone going to Whataburger and eating a bacon cheeseburger for lunch.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Peter Singer's 'Down On The Factory Farm'
422 Words | 2 PagesRhetorical Analysis “Down on the factory farm” The last thing that comes to our mind when we order a piece of steak at a restaurant is how that animal we are about to eat was being treated while they were alive. According to author Peter Singer’s article "Down on the factory farm” he questions what happened to your dinner when it was still an animal? He argues about the use and abuse of animals raised for our consumption. In Singer’s article he states personal facts and convincing statistics to raise a legitimate argument.
Persuasive Speech On Animal Testing
784 Words | 4 PagesI’m here today to talk about a controversial issue that has been around for a period of time, animal testing. Animal testing using animals in experiments with different chemical substances in everything from medical to cosmetic to determine their safety as well as effectiveness . It’s a problem that has existed since the 3rd and 4th centuries BCE with its merciless methods and painful ways of abusing animals for human demands, but now it’s time for it to stop. Our technology has developed significantly since; therefore, such medieval methods of torturing animals are no longer necessary. Researches have shown that each year, over 100 million animals are tortured and killed in American laboratories alone, including dogs, cats and more; this shows how far out of hand animal testing have gotten.
Persuasive Essay On Eating Meat
1421 Words | 6 PagesThe meat packing industry disregards animal’s emotions and their rights all together by the malicious treatment of animals. The way animals are being treated is highly unfair. Being slaughtered for their body parts and suffering just to be used for protein or an asset to humans is unbearable. An animal’s life is at equal values to a human and deserve the same rights as
More about Arguments Against Alastair Norcross
Analysis Of Michael Pollan´s An Animal's Place
324 Words | 2 PagesAssess The Significance Of Norcross's Analogy
553 Words | 3 PagesNamit Arora On Eating Animals Analysis
704 Words | 3 PagesNorcross Argument Essay: Don T Eat Factory Farm Animals
654 Words | 3 PagesChanging Our Outlook Of Animals During The Period Of 1800 To 1910
1293 Words | 6 PagesFrankie L Trull Animal Testing Rhetorical Analysis
743 Words | 3 PagesNorcross's Argument Analysis
538 Words | 3 PagesAnimal Cruelty In Factory Farms
1158 Words | 5 PagesPersuasive Speech Animal Testing
1084 Words | 5 PagesRhetorical Strategies In Eating Animals By Jonathan Safran Foer
577 Words | 3 PagesTracy Reiman Thesis
250 Words | 1 PagesFrancione's Argument Analysis
1001 Words | 5 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Peter Singer's 'Down On The Factory Farm'
422 Words | 2 PagesPersuasive Speech On Animal Testing
784 Words | 4 PagesPersuasive Essay On Eating Meat
1421 Words | 6 Pages