The destruction and use of a human embryo should not be allow to happen. Even if it isn 't fully formed from the moment is it concepted it is a human life and should be treated as such. The diseases and treatments that could come from giving up a human life are not worth it. It is giving up a life for a life. That life may not even be worth it because it takes multiple tries before the stem cells are even suitable for use in medical treatments.
First, one of the most common arguments against cloning is that people will lose their individuality if they are cloned. However, it is important to remember that cloning only creates a genetically identical copy of an organism, with a completely different personality. Quoted from “‘Goodbye Dolly?’: the ethics of human cloning”, to clone Bill Clinton would not produce more Presidents of the United States, just humans who looked like him but had a different individuality. Another argument is that it is a waste of human potential to create a spare embryo for preimplantation testing and then discard it. But, if no spare embryo is created and the original embryo is tested and not implanted because it is damaged by the procedure, it is also a waste of human potential.
We cannot alter nature’s way of sustaining the earth; it’s the natural order of things. Another reason why people discontinuing the study of embryonic stem cells and their possible repairing influences they have on the body would be a superb idea would be because death is certain, anything we may try to do to avoid death is pointless. There is a natural order to life and if people try to find one way to avoid death, there will be many more other ways to perish. Some will be harder to escape than
Is it because technology is not advanced enough yet? Or is it just because human cloning might be too dangerous? Many scientists are trying to clone humans but is it ever justified? There are a whole lot of debates on this topic, and I am strongly against it. Human cloning is ethically wrong; there are many risks involved, which will lead to detrimental effects on human society.
Is Four-Days The Way Imagine if we had a four-day school week instead of a five-day. Some school districts have changed from the traditional five-day school week to a four-day school week. The National Education Association should consider making the changes to a four-day school week, because it will save school districts money, students get better scores, and there is better attendance. One compelling reason is, that students will get better scores on tests. In the article, Is Four Days Better Than A Five Day School Week, the author states, “ ‘ Our ACT scores at the best they've been in 10 years, and our love it,’ said Chris” (https://newsela.com/articles/school-fourday/id/1002/).
As technology advances, more things become possible. One of these things is genetically modifying a baby, this is very wrong. Genetic modifying or genetic engineering is altering someone or something’s DNA. Scientists hope to cure diseases with this method but doing this can lead to some harmful effects. This process is very unethical.
Even though this research might become useful in the medical field, scientists should stop embryonic research because it is not productive, and there are better ways to get the desired results. Also, it is not moral to use and destroy embryos in this way. Embryonic stem cell research may become a very useful study for medical research. Embryonic stem cells have several properties
“Some cells mutate and cause tumors in patients.” Cells motify can form malignancy. Because you need to take cells to clone someone, it causes unusual growth of tissues which leads to a tumor. If cloning causes tumors that are much worse, than cloning should not even be allowed. When a loved one passes away it is not the best thing that can happen to anybody but cloning that person so that they can be here again will not ever be the same as if they were here alive. “Parents who have lost children have grieved and sought consultation from family community.
As mentioned previously, direct taxpayer support towards public universities has decreased lately leading to a rise in tuition prices. Universities are pressured by their boards to break even, and since student loans will just cover their price increases, they have no incentive to hold down tuition costs. That is where the solution must intervene. According to the Department of Education, public colleges made about $57 billion from tuition alone in the 2009-2010 school year. That gives the government a threshold of about $60 billion to spend on aid.
I for one would not want my child to receive any kind of vaccines that could affect their cognitive ability. I would not want to possibly give my child the virus that I am trying to keep them from getting just because they say that our antibodies can fight it off. We are not all the same some have a stronger immune system than others and some can barely fight off the common cold. I think that eventually the viruses that are put into our body through these vaccines will evolve and become more powerful and deadly than they are now, they will be strong enough to fight off our antibodies and they will eventually start to kill